Jump to content

International Legislation

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Choose a country or browse international frameworks. European Union coverage has its own directory, including the EU KIDS Act proposal (2026).

Countries

  • Malaysia — proposed AI Governance Bill, AI/personal-data framework consultation and national guidance.

  • Netherlands — Intelligence-services AI oversight under the Wiv 2017 and CTIVD Report 86.

  • Norway — government AI-glasses bill plan and separate parliamentary wearable-surveillance motion.

  • Peru — Public-sector AI-officer duties, appointment periods and professional-profile requirements.

  • Philippines — Privacy, copyright, financial-sector and judicial AI rules, national strategy, and proposed legislation.

  • Poland — National AI-supervision framework; specified enforcement provisions effective October 28, 2026.

EU implementation decisions

EU research guidance

International agreements and principles

Lithuania: reported voice-rights proposal (October 12, 2026)

BNS reported on October 12 that Lithuanian lawmakers have proposed Civil Code amendments establishing a right to one’s voice. Consent would be required for reproduction, publication or other use of actual recordings, imitations and artificially generated voices that identify a person. The proposal includes exceptions for parody and satire when they do not mislead the public about authenticity or infringe honour, dignity, professional reputation or privacy. Co-author Vytautas Kernagis cited disinformation and fraud risks. The government said it would assess existing protection for voices and digital likenesses. [1]

India: forthcoming SEBI AI guidelines (October 10, 2026)

ANI reporting published by ETCIO on October 12 says Securities and Exchange Board of India chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey announced on October 10 that SEBI will shortly issue guidelines for responsible AI and machine-learning use in capital markets. Speaking at the second Capital Market Confluence, he described a tiered approach with accountability, data controls, kill switches and human oversight, aligned with IOSCO’s AI supervisory toolkit. Pandey said regulated entities remain responsible for AI outcomes, data quality, model governance and cyber resilience. The announcement concerns forthcoming guidelines for securities-market participants.[2]

Historical coverage

References

  1. ↑ BNS via LRT, “Lithuanian lawmakers propose legal protection against AI voice cloning,” October 12, 2026, 11:17 a.m. Lithuania time. Full accessible article reviewed.
  2. ↑ ETCIO / ANI. Complete accessible source bodies reviewed October 12, 2026.