Jump to content

Malaysia AI Law

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Malaysia AI law is developing through a proposed Artificial Intelligence (AI) Governance Bill and existing guidance. The proposed Bill is not an enacted law. Malaysia's Ministry of Digital and National AI Office ran a public consultation in July–August 2026 on a possible national framework.[1]

Status at a glance

Instrument Status and dated evidence
Proposed AI Governance Bill Consultation ran July 10–August 1, 2026. On September 10, Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo described a completed draft and future Cabinet review. At an October 5 Dewan Rakyat question session, he described drafting as ongoing and projected tabling in early 2027. These are dated ministerial statements about a proposal; no bill introduction or commencement has been verified.[2][1][3]
National Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics Government guidance published in 2024, separately from the proposed Bill.[4]

Proposed AI Governance Bill

The National AI Office's official consultation described possible central institutional oversight, principle-based governance requirements and a risk-based regulatory framework. The Digital Ministry said its planned horizontal framework would complement existing laws and allocate responsibilities according to parties' roles and control over AI systems. These descriptions concern the proposal and consultation, not enforceable obligations.[1][5]

The public consultation record remains labeled “Pre-drafting” after closing on August 1. Minister Gobind's September 10 statement, reported by Malay Mail, described a completed draft and anticipated Cabinet review. At the October 5 Dewan Rakyat question session, he described drafting as ongoing and said the government expected to table the bill in early 2027. These reports describe different stages at different dates; neither establishes that a bill was introduced or supplies final clause text.[1][3][2][6]

According to the October 5 reports, the minister said the proposal would assess controls by an AI system's potential harm, rather than solely by sector, and would complement existing sectoral laws. He identified safety controls, testing, monitoring, human oversight and response mechanisms for increasingly powerful systems as elements of the intended approach. These statements describe the government's current drafting aims; exact duties await published bill text.[2][6] See October 5 news coverage.

References