Jump to content

Luciano Floridi

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Philosophy and commentary · International governance · AI safety and accountability

Luciano Floridi is a philosopher whose work on digital ethics includes AI governance and the relationship between ethical principles and legal regulation. He is the founding director of Yale University's Digital Ethics Center and has co-authored research on the legal implications of generative AI in the European Union.[1][2]

Roles and affiliations

Yale identifies Floridi as Professor in the Practice in its Cognitive Science Program. Before joining Yale, he was Professor of Philosophy and Ethics of Information at the Oxford Internet Institute. His publications include The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities (2023). The legal focus of this profile is his work on governance and implementation rather than his philosophical bibliography as a whole.[1]

Contributions and positions

Generative AI and European law

With Claudio Novelli, Federico Casolari, Philipp Hacker and Giorgio Spedicato, Floridi co-authored Generative AI in EU Law. The paper considers liability, privacy, intellectual property and cybersecurity questions raised by large language models. It examines difficulties arising from the complexity and unpredictability of generative systems and assesses how legal frameworks could respond.[2]

The open manuscript was revised in March 2024 and discusses the AI Act draft alongside other existing or proposed rules. It is therefore a dated scholarly analysis, not a current statement of all enacted provisions or implementation deadlines. Its usefulness lies in identifying legal questions across several fields rather than treating generative AI as a problem confined to a single statute.[2]

Implementation and governance design

The Digital Ethics Center's publication list includes work co-authored by Floridi on conformity assessment under the EU AI Act and on the design and governance of regulatory sandboxes. These publications connect broad governance questions to procedures for evaluating systems and structuring supervised experimentation. The list identifies them as research papers; their titles do not mean their proposed procedures have been adopted by regulators.[3]

The distinction between scholarship and official requirements matters when reading this work. A paper about conformity assessment can offer a procedure or interpretation without itself being an approved standard, binding guidance or a finding that a particular AI system complies with the law.[3]

Engagement with state lawmakers

Yale News reported in May 2025 that the center had convened state legislators, scholars, industry representatives and nonprofit participants to discuss AI legislation. The summit was organized with Connecticut Senator James Maroney. Topics included deepfakes, elections, open-source development and coordination among states.[4]

In that account, Floridi argued for legislation compatible across jurisdictions and for input from different affected groups. The event documents engagement with lawmaking; it does not establish that he authored every proposal discussed or that participants endorsed one common model law. The coverage is a university account of its own initiative and should be identified as such.[4]

Selected works

News and coverage

References

Profile sources last reviewed September 7, 2026. Dated positions and developments are identified in the text.