Jump to content

Kleiner v Adobe Inc

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name Kleiner v. Adobe Inc[1]
Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California[1]
Docket 3:26-cv-01218-JSC; consolidated lead case 3:25-cv-10732-JSC[2]
Filed February 9, 2026[1]
Judge(s) Jacqueline Scott Corley[2]
Plaintiffs Arthur Kleiner; consolidated with Elizabeth Lyon[2]
Defendants Adobe Inc.[1]
Case type Proposed civil class action[1]
Claims / issues Copyright infringement involving SlimLM and book-training datasets[1]
Status April 22, 2026: consolidated class complaint filed with Lyon; Adobe answered May 22, 2026. Later developments have not been verified.[2][3]

Kleiner v. Adobe Inc.' is a proposed class action lawsuit filed on February 9, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose), alleging that Adobe used unlicensed copies of copyrighted works — including the RedPajama dataset containing the Books3 corpus from the pirate site Bibliotik — to train its SlimLM small language models.[4]

Allegations

Plaintiff Arthur Kleiner, author of the registered work The Age of Heretics, alleges that Adobe copied, stored, reproduced, and used "cleaned and deduplicated" versions of the RedPajama dataset (which included the Books3 corpus sourced from the pirate site Bibliotik) and Common Crawl to train its SlimLM models.[5]

The complaint highlights the contrast between Adobe's "ethical AI" marketing and its alleged use of "notorious" piracy-tainted data. Specifically, it claims:[5]

  • Adobe downloaded and processed unlicensed copyrighted works from RedPajama/Books3 datasets
  • The SlimPajama-627B dataset used for training retained pirated books even after "cleaning and deduplication"
  • Ongoing infringement from continued possession and commercialization of models trained on pirated works

Procedural Status

April 22, 2026: consolidated class complaint filed with Lyon; Adobe answered May 22, 2026. Later developments have not been verified.[2][3]

Significance

This case is part of the broader wave of AI copyright litigation targeting large language model training practices. It is notable for specifically targeting Adobe's SlimLM models rather than the large frontier models more commonly sued, and for its focus on the RedPajama/Books3 pipeline as a source of pirated training data.[5]

Procedural Updates

On April 22, 2026, Lyon and Kleiner filed their consolidated copyright complaint against Adobe, combining their previously separate claims into a single action. The same week saw the filing of a shareholder derivative action (SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v. Narayen) against Adobe executives over AI training on copyrighted works.[6]

See Also

References