Businessing LLC v Runway AI Inc
Businessing LLC, doing business as Ali Spagnola, v. Runway AI, Inc. is a class action lawsuit filed on February 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angeles), alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) for unauthorized scraping of YouTube videos to train Runway AI's generative models.<ref>Mishcon de Reya - AI IP Policy Tracker</ref><ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref> The case is part of a broader wave of litigation targeting AI companies' harvesting of publicly available content without authorization.
Parties
Plaintiff
Businessing LLC, a California-based media company operating the YouTube channel @alispagnola, owned by Ali Spagnola. The channel has over 2.59 million subscribers and has generated millions of views. Spagnola creates comedy, music, and fitness content.<ref>Law360: Another YouTuber Sues Runway AI</ref>
Defendant
Runway AI, Inc., a New York-based AI company developing generative video models including Gen-3 Alpha. Runway is reportedly valued in the multi-billion-dollar range.<ref>Mishcon de Reya - AI IP Policy Tracker</ref>
Allegations
The complaint alleges Runway AI violated 17 U.S.C. Section 1201(a)(1) by circumventing YouTube's technological protection measures (TPMs) to scrape and download over 1,200 of Ali Spagnola's copyrighted videos.<ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref>
Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures
YouTube employs several technical measures to prevent bulk downloading, including:
- Rate limiting on video downloads
- IP blocking for suspicious activity
- Terms of Service prohibiting scraping and automated downloads
The complaint alleges Runway deliberately bypassed these measures using:
- Rotating IP addresses to evade detection
- Virtual machines and cloud infrastructure
- Automated tools to mass-download millions of copyrighted videos<ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref>
Training Dataset Use
The scraped videos--including Spagnola's content--allegedly served as training data for Runway's Gen-3 and other generative video models capable of producing text-to-video and image-to-video outputs. The lawsuit claims this provided Runway with commercial gain while violating creators' exclusive rights.<ref>Law360: Another YouTuber Sues Runway AI</ref>
Willful Conduct
The complaint emphasizes that Runway, as a sophisticated AI company, made conscious choices to circumvent YouTube's TPMs rather than pursue lawful licensing, depriving creators of control over their works and the ability to monetize their content.<ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref>
Legal Claims
- DMCA Section 1201(a)(1) Anti-Circumvention -- Unlawful circumvention of technological measures controlling access to copyrighted works<ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref>
Class Action
The case is filed as a class action on behalf of "independent YouTube content creators whose videos were scraped by Runway AI." The class is defined by common questions including:
- Runway's circumvention methods
- Willfulness of the conduct
- Class-wide injury to creators whose content was taken without authorization<ref>Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. - Complaint</ref>
Relief Sought
Plaintiff seeks:
- Statutory damages under the DMCA
- Injunctive relief
- Restitution of profits
- Attorneys' fees and costs
- Other appropriate remedies<ref>Mishcon de Reya - AI IP Policy Tracker</ref>
Related Cases
Businessing LLC's suit is part of a cluster of similar DMCA cases targeting Runway AI:
- Ace Cam, Inc. v. Runway AI, Inc. -- Filed February 18, 2026, in the Southern District of New York (1:26-cv-01698). This case has been consolidated with Businessing LLC's action.<ref>Law360: Another YouTuber Sues Runway AI</ref><ref name="benesch">Benesch AI Reporter, April 2026</ref>
- David Vance Gardner v. Runway AI, Inc. -- Filed February 23, 2026; consolidated with Businessing LLC and Ace Cam actions<ref>Law360: Another YouTuber Sues Runway AI</ref><ref name="benesch" />
Case Consolidation
The Ace Cam, Inc. (d/b/a Random Golf Club) action, filed February 18, 2026, in the Southern District of New York, has been consolidated with the Businessing LLC (d/b/a Ali Spagnola) action.<ref name="benesch" /> Both cases allege that Runway AI circumvented YouTube's technological protection measures to scrape video content for training its generative models, and the consolidation enables coordinated pretrial proceedings.
Procedural History
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| February 18, 2026 | Ace Cam, Inc. v. Runway AI filed in S.D.N.Y. |
| February 23, 2026 | Gardner v. Runway AI filed |
| February 27, 2026 | Businessing LLC v. Runway AI filed in C.D. Cal. |
Significance
The case highlights the growing tension between:
- AI companies' use of publicly available web content for training
- Creators' rights under the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions
- Platform terms of service as a basis for liability
The DMCA claim differs from traditional copyright infringement claims by focusing on the *method* of acquisition (circumventing TPMs) rather than the *use* of content post-acquisition. This legal theory avoids some fair use defenses while potentially exposing AI companies to statutory damages.<ref>Copyright Alliance - Copyright Stories February 2026</ref>
Case Information
}See Also
- April 25, 2026 -- YouTuber Ali Spagnola Sues Runway AI Over Alleged Video Scraping
- Ted Entertainment v OpenAI Inc -- Similar DMCA action against OpenAI (April 2026)
- Cases -- Full list of AI-related litigation
References
<references />
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Caption | Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc. |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Filed | February 27, 2026 |
| Cause of Action | DMCA Section 1201(a)(1) anti-circumvention |
| Class Action | Yes |