Jump to content

Beaulier v NVIDIA et al

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name Beaulier v. NVIDIA et al[1][2][3][4]
Court N.D. California (NVIDIA, Meta, Roblox); W.D. Washington (Microsoft)[1][2][3][4]
Docket NVIDIA: 5:26-cv-02647; Meta: 3:26-cv-02632; Roblox: 5:26-cv-02642; Microsoft: 2:26-cv-01031[1][2][3][4]
Filed March 26, 2026 (four separate actions)[1][2][3][4]
Judge(s) NVIDIA: Eumi K. Lee; Meta: Charles R. Breyer; Roblox: Beth Labson Freeman; Microsoft: Jamal N. Whitehead[5][6][7][8]
Plaintiffs Austin Beaulier[1][2][3][4]
Defendants NVIDIA Corporation; Meta Platforms, Inc.; Roblox Corporation; Microsoft Corporation (separate actions)[1][2][3][4]
Case type Four proposed civil class actions[1][2][3][4]
Claims / issues DMCA § 1202(b): alleged removal of copyright-management information from 3D models[1][2][3][4]
Status July–August 2026: dismissal motions briefed in the four actions; no resulting ruling verified.[5][6][7][8]

Beaulier v. NVIDIA et al describes four proposed civil class actions in N.D. California (NVIDIA, Meta, Roblox); W.D. Washington (Microsoft).[1][2][3][4]

Claims and issues

DMCA § 1202(b): alleged removal of copyright-management information from 3D models.[1][2][3][4]

Procedural history

July–August 2026: dismissal motions briefed in the four actions; no resulting ruling verified.[5][6][7][8]

The four complaints are separate proposed class actions by Austin Beaulier, each asserting DMCA § 1202(b) claims concerning copyright-management information in 3D models.[1][2][3][4]

See also

References