Wisconsin AI Law
AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.
Browse Wisconsin law and bill articles, dated legislative records, and the historical tracker below. A date in an entry identifies the recorded event or source check; it does not imply that every measure has been rechecked today.
Court-rule proposals
Generative-AI petition 26-02: dismissed
Jay Stone filed Rule Petition 26-02 on February 19, 2026, seeking a new Supreme Court Rules Chapter 76 on generative AI in court proceedings. The proposed text addressed accuracy verification, confidentiality, disclosure of substantive AI-generated filings and personal responsibility for lawyers, self-represented litigants and judicial personnel.[1]
In a letter dated September 28 and received by the court September 30, Stone requested withdrawal because he had decided not to pursue the proposed rule.[2] On October 15, 2026, the Wisconsin Supreme Court granted the withdrawal motion and dismissed the petition. The order ends petition 26-02 without adopting its proposed Chapter 76.[3]
Historical tracker
May 1, 2026 tracker snapshot
These entries retain the historical NCSL snapshot used by the former state directory. Status labels, including “pending,” “enacted,” “failed,” and “vetoed,” describe that snapshot, not a current-status assessment. This is not a complete inventory of enacted law.
NCSL’s May 1, 2026 snapshot lists 17 AI-related 2026 measures for Wisconsin.[4]
Other measures recorded in the snapshot
- WI A 105 — Distribution of Certain Material on the Internet; vetoed; Concerns the distribution of certain material on the Internet, relates to publishing and distributing certain materials to minors. Topics: Deepfake.
- WI A 1109 — Authorization Use of Artificial Intelligence; failed; Concerns use of artificial intelligence to deny prior authorization for medical necessity or experimental status. Topics: Health Use, Notification, Private Sector Use.
- WI A 1190 — Algorithmic Pricing of Essential Consumer Goods; failed; Concerns algorithmic pricing of essential consumer goods, grants rule making authority, provides a penalty. Topics: Private Sector Use.
- WI A 142 — Algorithmic Software for Residential Housing; failed; Concerns algorithmic software for residential housing, provides a penalty. Topics: Housing, Private Sector Use.
- WI A 292 — Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedings; failed; Concerns the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretati.... Topics: Judicial Use, Private Sector Use.
- WI A 33 — Representations Depicting Nudity; failed; Concerns representations depicting nudity, provides a penalty. Topics: Deepfake.
- WI A 377 — Establishing English As the Official State Language; failed; Establishes English as the official state language, use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation tools in lieu of appointing Eng.... Topics: Government Use.
- WI A 959 — Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence; failed; Concerns the legal status of artificial intelligence. Topics: Personhood.
- WI A 965 — Artificial Intelligence Systems; failed; Concerns artificial intelligence systems that simulate humanlike relationships with children, provides a penalty. Topics: Health Use, Private Sector Use, Private Right of Action.
- WI S 1066 — Use of Artificial Intelligence; failed; Concerns use of artificial intelligence to deny prior authorization for medical necessity or experimental status. Topics: Health Use, Private Sector Use.
- WI S 1140 — Algorithmic Pricing of Essential Consumer Goods; failed; Concerns algorithmic pricing of essential consumer goods, grants rule making authority, provides a penalty. Topics: Private Sector Use.
- WI S 130 — Distribution of Certain Material on the Internet; failed; Concerns the distribution of certain material on the internet. Topics: Deepfake.
- WI S 142 — Algorithmic Software for Residential Housing; failed; Concerns algorithmic software for residential housing, provides a penalty. Topics: Housing, Private Sector Use.
- WI S 295 — Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Proceedings; failed; Concerns the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretati.... Topics: Judicial Use.
- WI S 357 — English As the Official State Language; failed; Establishes English as the official state language, relates to use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation tools in lieu of app.... Topics: Government Use.
- WI S 932 — Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence; failed; Concerns the legal status of artificial intelligence. Topics: Personhood.
- WI S 939 — Artificial Intelligence Systems; failed; Concerns artificial intelligence systems that simulate humanlike relationships with children, provides a penalty. Topics: Health Use, Private Sector Use, Private Right of Action.
Related federal case
- United States v. Anderegg — The Seventh Circuit addressed a federal possession charge involving AI-generated virtual child sexual abuse material on August 25, 2026; the opinion did not decide the validity of Wisconsin law.
Related state case
- Miescke v. Pahl — October 8, 2026 unpublished appellate opinion cautions about possible AI inaccuracies and sensitive-data privacy, and separately awards fees for a frivolous appeal.[5]
Related news
- October 16, 2026 news coverage — dismissal of generative-AI court-rule petition 26-02.
References
- ↑ Rule Petition 26-02, dated February 15 and filed February 19, 2026, all four scanned pages visually reviewed October 11, 2026.
- ↑ Jay Stone, request to withdraw Rule Petition 26-02, September 28, 2026, received September 30; complete letter reviewed October 11, 2026.
- ↑ Wisconsin Supreme Court, Rule Petition 26-02, order filed October 15, 2026, complete one-page order reviewed October 16, 2026.
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, Artificial Intelligence Legislation Database (updated May 1, 2026).
- ↑ Wisconsin Court of Appeals opinion, October 8, 2026, footnote 3 and paragraphs 93–95; full body reviewed.