Jump to content

The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v OpenAI Inc et al

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v. OpenAI, Inc. et al.[1]
Court U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York[1]
Docket 1:26-cv-07644[1]
Filed September 4, 2026[1]
Judge(s) Not identified in the available public filing record.
Plaintiffs The Seattle Times Company; Newsday LLC[1]
Defendants OpenAI, Inc.; OpenAI GP, LLC; OpenAI, LLC; OpenAI OpCo, LLC; OpenAI Global LLC; OAI Corporation; OpenAI Holdings, LLC; OpenAI Foundation; OpenAI Group PBC; Microsoft Corporation[1]
Case type Civil action[1]
Claims / issues Copyright infringement; DMCA copyright-management-information claims; federal, Washington and New York trademark dilution[1]
Status Complaint filed September 4, 2026. Later procedural developments have not been verified.[1]

The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v OpenAI Inc et al is a copyright, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and trademark action filed on September 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.[1]

Background

The publishers allege that OpenAI and Microsoft copied their journalism without permission or compensation by scraping their websites, bypassing paywalls, and incorporating articles into datasets used to train, fine-tune, and ground generative-AI products.[1] The complaint alleges that those products can reproduce or closely paraphrase the publishers’ work and compete with the original reporting.[1]

The complaint includes an example in which ChatGPT allegedly produced an 88-word verbatim passage from The Seattle Times’ Pulitzer-winning Boeing 737 MAX coverage after receiving the article’s headline and URL.[1]

Claims

The publishers assert direct and vicarious copyright infringement, violations of the DMCA’s copyright-management-information provisions, federal trademark dilution, and related Washington and New York trademark-dilution claims.[1] They seek damages, injunctive relief, and the impoundment or destruction of copies, training datasets, and language models incorporating their works or derivatives.[1]

Procedural History

The complaint was filed on September 4, 2026, and demands a jury trial.[1]

Significance

The action adds two regional news publishers to the group challenging the use of journalism in generative-AI training and output generation.[1]

See Also

References