462
edits
(Migration export) |
(Added Adobe shareholder derivative suit and DOJ xAI Colorado challenge sections) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
3. Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban | 3. Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban | ||
4. State AI Legislation Week April 24 | 4. State AI Legislation Week April 24 | ||
5. SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit Against Adobe Executives | |||
6. DOJ Joins xAI Challenge to Colorado AI Law | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 230: | Line 232: | ||
[[Category:Tennessee]] | [[Category:Tennessee]] | ||
[[Category:Utah]] | [[Category:Utah]] | ||
---- | |||
== SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit Against Adobe Executives == | |||
'''April 24, 2026''' — The SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust filed a shareholder derivative action against Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen and other executives, alleging breach of fiduciary duty for adopting and implementing an unlawful business strategy whereby Adobe used copyrighted material to develop its Artificial Intelligence (AI) services.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld">[https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2026/04/24/consolidated-copyright-complaint-v-adobe-in-lyon-lawsuit-filed-as-adobe-executives-hit-with-breach-of-fiduciary-lawsuit-by-shareholder-seiu-pension-plan-master-trust-based-on-adobes-ai-training-wit/ ChatGPT is Eating the World, "Consolidated copyright complaint v. Adobe in Lyon lawsuit filed as Adobe executives hit with breach of fiduciary lawsuit by shareholder SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust," April 24, 2026]</ref> | |||
This is the '''first shareholder derivative suit''' based on AI training practices. The complaint describes the action as a "stockholder derivative action brought by plaintiff [the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Pension Plan Master Trust] on behalf of Adobe against certain of its officers and directors for adopting and implementing an unlawful business strategy whereby Adobe used copyrighted material to develop its Artificial Intelligence (AI) services." | |||
The filing was made the same day that author Douglas Lyon's complaint was consolidated with photographer Sarah Kleiner's lawsuit into a single action against Adobe Inc. for AI training on copyrighted works. | |||
''See individual article: [[News Adobe-Shareholder-Derivative-Suit-2026|SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit v. Adobe Executives]]'' | |||
---- | |||
== DOJ Joins xAI Challenge to Colorado AI Law == | |||
'''April 24, 2026''' — The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, filed a statement of interest intervening in '''''xAI Corp v. Weiser''''', Elon Musk's lawsuit challenging '''Colorado SB 24-205''' (the Colorado AI Act). The DOJ sided with xAI, arguing that Colorado's landmark AI regulation law is preempted by federal policy and violates constitutional protections.<ref name="reuters">[https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-department-intervenes-xai-challenge-colorado-tech-law-2026-04-24/ Reuters, US Justice Department intervenes in xAI challenge to Colorado tech law]</ref><ref name="guardian">[https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/apr/24/us-justice-department-xai-colorado-ai-law The Guardian, US Justice Department steps in on behalf of xAI in Colorado regulation case]</ref><ref name="bloomberg">[https://news.bgov.com/business-and-practice/doj-joins-musks-xai-suit-against-colorado-ai-discrimination-law Bloomberg Law, DOJ Joins Musk's xAI Suit Against Colorado AI Discrimination Law]</ref> | |||
The DOJ's intervention represents a significant escalation of the federal government's stance against state-level AI regulation. The Trump administration had previously signaled opposition to state AI laws through its AI policy framework and the DOJ AI Litigation Task Force established in January 2026. | |||
''See individual article: [[News DOJ-Joins-xAI-Colorado-AI-Law-Challenge-2026|DOJ Joins xAI Colorado AI Law Challenge]]'' | |||
[[Category:Daily News]] | [[Category:Daily News]] | ||