Sony Music Publishing et al v Anthropic PBC et al
AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.
Sony Music Publishing et al. v. Anthropic PBC et al. is a federal copyright action alleging unauthorized copying and use of musical compositions in the development and operation of Anthropic’s Claude models.[2]
Allegations
The plaintiffs allege that Anthropic obtained protected lyrics and sheet music through BitTorrent downloads from LibGen and PiLiMi, web scraping, third-party datasets, and destructive scanning of physical books.[2] They allege that Anthropic copied tens of thousands of musical compositions in model training and that Claude generated verbatim, near-verbatim, derivative, and competing lyric outputs.[2]
The complaint alleges that Dario Amodei and Benjamin Mann directed or approved torrenting activity, and that Anthropic removed or altered copyright-management information while processing training material and generating outputs.[2]
Claims and relief
The complaint asserts direct copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, and removal or alteration of copyright-management information under 17 U.S.C. § 1202.[2] The plaintiffs seek statutory or actual damages, attributable profits, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs, and a jury trial.[2]
Significance
The action challenges both alleged input-stage copying for Claude training and alleged output-stage reproduction of protected lyrics.[2]
See Also
- August 28, 2026 coverage
- August 28, 2026 AI Law Digest
- BMG Rights Management v Anthropic PBC
- Round Hill Music LP v Anthropic PBC
- Bartz v Anthropic PBC