Jump to content

News-August-13-2026

From AI Law Wiki

August 13, 2026 — Flock Safety announced tighter safeguards for its automated license-plate-reader network after reported police misuse, and India's Supreme Court sent proposals for binding ethics and transparency rules for government AI systems to the Union government for policy consideration.[1][2][3][4]

Contents

[edit]
  1. Flock adds privacy and police-accountability controls
  2. India's Supreme Court sends government-AI safeguards for policy review

Flock adds privacy and police-accountability controls

[edit]

Flock Safety said it would reduce the default retention period for vehicle-movement data from 30 days to seven days.[1][2] Officers seeking longer retention will be prompted to provide a criminal case number.[1][2]

The company also said it would fully deploy Audit Assistance, a system intended to lock out users whose searches show abnormal activity.[1][2] Flock described the measures as responses to privacy concerns and officer abuse, while the American Civil Liberties Union said the changes did not resolve its broader concern about mass collection of license-plate data involving people not suspected of wrongdoing.[1]

India's Supreme Court sends government-AI safeguards for policy review

[edit]

India's Supreme Court disposed of a public-interest petition without deciding its merits and directed that the petition be treated as a representation for the Union government to consider when evaluating AI policy measures.[3][4] The bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana.[3][4]

The court said regulation of AI is a highly technical issue within the policy domain and that judges lacked the specialized expertise to design an operational framework.[3][4] Advocate Narendra Kumar Goswami's petition sought disclosure of high-risk AI systems used in welfare, policing, surveillance, and content regulation, along with binding ethics standards, algorithmic-impact assessments, bias audits, human oversight, data-protection safeguards, and comprehensive legislation governing state use of AI.[3][4]

References

[edit]