Jump to content

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v X Corp

From AI Law Wiki

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. X Corp. et al.[1]
Court D. Md.; removed from Circuit Court for Baltimore City[2]
Docket 1:26-cv-02103; state C-24-CV-26-002129[2]
Filed March 24, 2026 (dated state complaint); May 27, 2026 (federal removal)[2]
Judge(s) Ellen Lipton Hollander[2]
Plaintiffs Mayor and City Council of Baltimore[1]
Defendants X Corp.; X.AI Corp.; X.AI LLC. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. dismissed July 17, 2026.[2]
Case type Civil consumer protection proceeding[1]
Claims / issues Baltimore Consumer Protection Ordinance; alleged deceptive marketing and sexualized Grok images[1]
Status July 17, 2026: dismissal of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. approved; June 29 dismissal motion by the X/xAI defendants remains unresolved in the docket reviewed through July 23. Later proceedings not verified.[2]

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. X Corp. et al. is a municipal consumer-protection case over Grok’s alleged generation and distribution of nonconsensual sexualized images.[1]

Claims and procedural history

The city alleges that the defendants marketed X and Grok as governed by effective safeguards while omitting material risks and permitting abusive image generation. It seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief under Baltimore’s Consumer Protection Ordinance.[1]

This proceeding concerns Grok content and marketing. The separate NAACP and Carter actions concern data-center infrastructure.[1]

The action was removed on May 27, 2026. The X/xAI defendants moved to dismiss on June 29; the court approved dismissal of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. on July 17. The available docket ends July 23 and does not establish a later decision on the remaining defendants’ motion.[2]

References