Kipp Flores Architects LLC v AMH Creekside Development LLC
AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.
Kipp Flores Architects, LLC v. AMH Creekside Development, LLC is an architectural-copyright case addressing copyright-management information under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. It is not an AI-training case, but its interpretation of section 1202(b) has been compared with the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Doe v. GitHub, Inc..[1]
Fifth Circuit decision
The Fifth Circuit held that section 1202(b)’s prohibition on removing or altering copyright-management information requires removal or alteration from an existing copy. It affirmed dismissal of the DMCA claims because the challenged marketing images were newly created copies that had never contained Kipp Flores’s information. The panel vacated dismissal of separate copyright-infringement claims and remanded them for further proceedings.[1]