Gracenote Media Services v OpenAI

Gracenote Media Services, LLC v. OpenAI (Case No. 1:26-cv-01947, S.D.N.Y.) is a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Nielsen subsidiary Gracenote against OpenAI, alleging unauthorized copying and use of Gracenote's proprietary media metadata database to train and power AI products including ChatGPT.<ref name="complaint">Gracenote Media Services v. OpenAI Complaint Overview</ref><ref name="axios">Axios, "Nielsen's Gracenote sues OpenAI for copyright infringement", March 10, 2026</ref>

Parties

Plaintiff: Gracenote Media Services, LLC, a Nielsen subsidiary that maintains a copyrighted entertainment metadata database (the Programs Database) covering music, video, and sports content, including relational architecture and descriptive metadata used by media distributors worldwide<ref name="complaint" /><ref name="axios" />

Defendants: OpenAI Foundation (f/k/a OpenAI, Inc.), OpenAI Group PBC, OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI, LLC, OpenAI OpCo, LLC, OpenAI Global, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, and OpenAI Holdings, LLC (collectively "OpenAI")<ref name="complaint" />

Plaintiff Counsel: Susman Godfrey LLP<ref name="complaint" />

Court

Court: United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Docket Number: 1:26-cv-01947<ref name="docket">Justia Docket: Gracenote v. OpenAI</ref>

Filing Date: March 10, 2026<ref name="axios" /><ref name="docket" />

Claims

Gracenote alleges that OpenAI willfully copied its copyrighted metadata and relational framework without permission or license to train large language models for products like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Enterprise, and developer APIs. Specific allegations include:<ref name="complaint" /><ref name="vital">VitalLaw, "Entertainment Metadata Creator Sues OpenAI"</ref>

Unauthorized reproduction of Gracenote's copyrighted Programs Database and relational architecture
OpenAI models reproduce exact copies of Gracenote data verbatim (e.g., exact "Game of Thrones" episode summaries and metadata)
AI outputs enable competitors to build substitutive metadata products, threatening Gracenote's core business
Willful infringement seeking actual damages, statutory damages, and injunctive relief
Jury trial demanded

Current Status

The case is newly filed and pending. It has been affirmed as related to the Multi-District Litigation In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation. No rulings, motions, or settlements have been reported as of April 2026. The complaint has been noted as the 90th U.S. copyright lawsuit against AI companies.<ref name="chatgptworld">ChatGPTIsEatingTheWorld, "Gracenote Media v. OpenAI Case Tracker"</ref><ref name="docket" />

Significance

This case raises the novel issue of whether database metadata and relational architecture — not raw creative content but structured descriptive data — qualifies for copyright protection against AI training. A ruling in Gracenote's favor could significantly expand the scope of copyrighted material that AI companies must license, beyond traditional books, music, and images.<ref name="vital" /><ref name="axios" />

Related Cases

Bartz v Anthropic PBC — Authors' $1.5B settlement over pirated book training
Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc — Authors allege Meta trained LLaMA on pirated books
Carreyrou v Anthropic PBC — Opt-out authors sue multiple AI companies

References