Jump to content

UMG Recordings Inc v Suno Inc (2026)

From AI Law Wiki
Revision as of 13:18, 19 September 2026 by AILawWikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (Assign digest stories by first wiki publication date; remove automatic carry-forward)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name UMG Recordings Inc. et al. v. Suno Inc.[1]
Court U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts[1]
Docket 1:26-cv-14275[1]
Filed September 18, 2026[1]
Judge(s) Not identified in the reviewed complaint.
Plaintiffs UMG Recordings; Capitol Records; Sony Music Entertainment and nine affiliated labels[1]
Defendants Suno Inc.; John Does 1–10[1]
Case type Copyright and anti-circumvention action[1]
Claims / issues Sound recordings; 17 U.S.C. § 1201 circumvention[1]
Status September 18, 2026: complaint filed[1]

Universal and Sony record-label plaintiffs filed this second action against Suno and John Does 1–10 on September 18, 2026, asserting claims involving 60,202 sound recordings. The case has a separate docket from the 2024 Suno action.[1]

Allegations and requested relief

The complaint alleges unauthorized copying for AI training and circumvention of YouTube access controls. It seeks damages and injunctive relief for post-1972 and pre-1972 recordings and the alleged circumvention.[1]

Music Business Worldwide reports that the new suit follows the refusal to add additional recordings to the earlier case and also contests the provenance of Suno’s v6 models.[2]

References