Jump to content

AI Law Wiki News for September 19, 2026

From AI Law Wiki
Revision as of 13:17, 19 September 2026 by AILawWikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (Assign digest stories by first wiki publication date; remove automatic carry-forward)

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Consumers challenge alleged AI-development coordination under antitrust law

Four consumers filed Buist v. Anthropic PBC in the Northern District of California on September 18, 2026, alleging that Anthropic, OpenAI OpCo LLC, SpaceXAI LLC and Google LLC coordinated to slow improvement of competing AI subscriptions in violation of the Sherman Act.[1]

The proposed class action seeks treble damages and an injunction. It brings the debate over coordinated AI development into antitrust litigation. Politico reports that the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.[1][2]


Universal and Sony label plaintiffs filed a second lawsuit against Suno on September 18, 2026, alleging unauthorized use of 60,202 sound recordings for AI training and circumvention of YouTube access controls. The Massachusetts complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief.[3]

Music Business Worldwide reports that the action follows a decision limiting expansion of the earlier Suno case and also challenges the provenance of Suno’s v6 models.[4]


Bipartisan No FLOCK Act would restrict police use of automated plate readers

On September 15, 2026, Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi and Michael Cloud announced the bipartisan No Federal License-Plate Observation and Camera Keeping (No FLOCK) Act. The proposal would require states to limit automated license-plate readers to specified public-safety and toll-enforcement uses. After a two-fiscal-year implementation period, states without those restrictions would lose 10 percent of specified federal surface-transportation funding each fiscal year.[5]

The official bill record identifies H.R. 10366 as introduced September 14 and referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.[6]

Permitted uses would include toll enforcement, finding stolen vehicles or missing or endangered people, identifying vehicles registered to people with felony warrants, and investigating vehicles involved in felonies. The proposal addresses misuse of automated surveillance systems, including Flock Safety, amid privacy and civil-rights concerns.[7]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Buist et al. v. Anthropic PBC et al., No. 3:26-cv-10693 (N.D. Cal.), ECF 1, filed September 18, 2026, pp. 1–7, 25–29.
  2. ↑ Tyler Katzenberger and Christine Mui, Politico via Yahoo News, “Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development,” September 18, 2026 (September 19 UTC).
  3. ↑ UMG Recordings Inc. et al. v. Suno Inc., No. 1:26-cv-14275 (D. Mass.), ECF 1, filed September 18, 2026, pp. 1–2, 39–45.
  4. ↑ Music Business Worldwide, “Universal and Sony sue Suno for a second time,” September 18, 2026.
  5. ↑ Office of Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, “Krishnamoorthi and Cloud Introduce Bipartisan No FLOCK Act to Crack Down on Abuse of License Plate Readers,” September 15, 2026.
  6. ↑ H.R. 10366, 119th Congress, introduced September 14, 2026, introductory record and sections 1–2 (GovInfo).
  7. ↑ Edward Graham, Nextgov/FCW, “Tech bills of the week,” September 18, 2026.
Retrieved from "https://ailawwiki.com/index.php?title=AI_Law_Wiki_News_for_September_19,_2026&oldid=4859"