Jane Doe 1 v X.AI Corp

Revision as of 16:24, 7 September 2026 by AILawWikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (Standardize researched case information in a responsive sidebar; correct parties, docket and dated procedural status)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name Jane Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp[1]
Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California[1]
Docket 5:26-cv-09016[1]
Filed August 26, 2026[1]
Judge(s) Not identified in the sources reviewed.
Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, on behalf of herself and a proposed class[1]
Defendants X.AI Corp.; X.AI LLC[1]
Case type Proposed civil class action[1]
Claims / issues Civil remedies for alleged AI-generated child sexual abuse material, including 18 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2252A(f)[1]
Status Complaint filed August 26, 2026. Later developments have not been verified.[1]

Jane Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., Case No. 5:26-cv-09016, is a proposed class action filed August 26, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC.[2] The plaintiff alleges that xAI trained Grok on child sexual abuse material depicting her and that Grok generated new CSAM based on those images.[2][3]


Allegations

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a survivor depicted in known, hashed legacy CSAM and that xAI used material depicting her as part of the dataset for Grok’s image and video capabilities.[2] It further alleges that Grok generated new CSAM depicting her and that Grok outputs posted publicly on X were eligible for reuse in model training.[2][3]

The complaint describes the action as the first case accusing xAI of training Grok on CSAM, rather than only failing to prevent Grok from generating abusive images.[3] These are allegations and have not been adjudicated.[2]

Claims and requested relief

The plaintiff asserts claims under Masha’s Law, 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(f), based on alleged production, possession, transportation, and distribution of CSAM.[2] The proposed class covers people in the United States whose childhood images or videos Grok allegedly altered to produce CSAM.[2]

The complaint seeks actual, liquidated, and punitive damages, litigation costs and fees, and injunctive relief requiring xAI to stop generating, possessing, or transporting covered material and to destroy material already created.[2]

Procedural status

The complaint was filed on August 26, 2026, and demands a jury trial.[2] No merits ruling is reported in the cited filing.[2]

See also

References