Jump to content

News-August-06-2026

From AI Law Wiki

August 6, 2026 — Representative Ro Khanna announced a proposed “Data Center Bill of Rights” resolution intended to give local communities authority to reject data-center projects and protect residents from utility, water, and pollution burdens associated with AI infrastructure.[1][2] Representatives Greg Casar, Valerie Foushee, and Sara Jacobs also unveiled the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, which would tax certain large-model activity and use the revenue for a federal job-creation program.[3] A New Mexico court also ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a youth-harm abatement fund and make changes to Facebook and Instagram after an earlier jury verdict against the company.[4][5][6]

Contents

[edit]
  1. Khanna proposes community “Data Center Bill of Rights”
  2. House Democrats unveil AI Tax and Work Protection Act
  3. New Mexico court orders $567 million Meta youth-harm remedy

Khanna proposes community “Data Center Bill of Rights”

[edit]

Khanna said the resolution would establish rights for local communities to reject proposed data centers through a transparent process and to prohibit facilities within 2,500 feet of homes, schools, childcare facilities, hospitals, or nursing homes.[1][2]

The proposal would preserve states’ ability to pause new data centers until safeguards address electricity-rate increases, local water supplies, and pollution standards.[1][2] It would also preserve municipal authority to regulate data-center development without state preemption, require clean and reliable energy and compliance with pollution limits, and allow communities to demand that utility bills not increase because of the projects.[1]

Khanna said opposition to data centers was the strongest feedback he received during recent travel in Pennsylvania and argued that communities should be able to prevent facilities from being placed in farmland or residential areas.[1][2]


House Democrats unveil AI Tax and Work Protection Act

[edit]

Casar, Foushee, and Jacobs unveiled the AI Tax and Work Protection Act, which would tax companies that develop or sell access to certain large AI models and companies that use those models to reduce their workforces.[3]

The proposal would raise tax rates when unemployment exceeds 5 percent, while permitting the Treasury Department to suspend those increases when higher unemployment results from a war, pandemic, or another major shock unrelated to AI.[3] It would create a Work Protection Administration within the Department of Labor to award job-creation grants to state and local governments for fields including child care, construction, education, health care, housing, infrastructure, and environmental conservation.[3]

Casar had previously argued that an AI tax should combine token use and underlying computing power, apply to providers rather than consumers, and charge more for use by large corporations, with revenue directed to employment programs.[7]


New Mexico court orders $567 million Meta youth-harm remedy

[edit]

Judge Bryan Biedscheid ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address harms to young people from Facebook and Instagram, with $420 million allocated to treatment services and the balance assigned to awareness, prevention, screening, and other costs over five years.[4]

The remedy followed a first-phase jury award of $375 million in civil penalties after jurors found that Meta knowingly harmed children's mental health and concealed information about child sexual exploitation on its platforms.[4][5]

The court also ordered Facebook and Instagram to provide recurring banners and informational screens explaining protection features, best practices, and tools for handling inappropriate comments, with those changes and a New Mexico educational campaign subject to state review.[4] Meta said it disagreed with the ruling and would appeal.[4]

References

[edit]