689
edits
News-May-06-2026: Difference between revisions
Add 3 stories: Canada OpenAI privacy, California Bar ethics, FCC ruling
(Add Murati testimony section (Musk v Altman trial Day 6)) |
(Add 3 stories: Canada OpenAI privacy, California Bar ethics, FCC ruling) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
3. Brockman Testifies Musk Sought OpenAI Control to Fund Mars City | 3. Brockman Testifies Musk Sought OpenAI Control to Fund Mars City | ||
4. Murati Testifies Altman Sowed Chaos and Distrust at OpenAI | 4. Murati Testifies Altman Sowed Chaos and Distrust at OpenAI | ||
5. Canadian Privacy Regulators Find OpenAI Violated Law | |||
6. California Bar Proposes First AI-Specific Ethics Rules | |||
7. Eighth Circuit Strikes Down FCC Broadband Anti-Discrimination Rule | |||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
''See full article: [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-6-2026|May 6, 2026 — Murati Testifies Altman Sowed Chaos and Distrust at OpenAI]]'' | ''See full article: [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-6-2026|May 6, 2026 — Murati Testifies Altman Sowed Chaos and Distrust at OpenAI]]'' | ||
---- | |||
== Canadian Privacy Regulators Find OpenAI Violated Law == | |||
Canadian federal and provincial privacy commissioners found on May 6, 2026 that OpenAI did not respect Canadian privacy laws when training ChatGPT, collecting personal information including health conditions, political views, and data about children without adequate safeguards. Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne said OpenAI launched ChatGPT "without having fully addressed known privacy issues." The investigation, conducted by the federal commissioner and counterparts in Quebec, British Columbia, and Alberta, was initiated in 2023 following a complaint about unlawful collection and disclosure of personal information. OpenAI disagreed with the findings but agreed to implement further privacy measures.<ref name="cbc">[https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/privacy-investigation-chatgpt-open-ai-9.7188538 CBC: OpenAI didn't respect Canadian privacy law when it trained ChatGPT]</ref> | |||
''See full article: [[News-Canada-OpenAI-Privacy-Investigation-2026|May 6, 2026 — Canadian Privacy Regulators Find OpenAI Violated Law]]'' | |||
---- | |||
== California Bar Proposes First AI-Specific Ethics Rules == | |||
The State Bar of California proposed the first AI-specific amendments to the California Rules of Professional Conduct on May 6, 2026, addressing competence, client communication, confidentiality, candor toward tribunals, and supervision of AI use by lawyers. The six proposals, introduced by the Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC), require lawyers to independently verify AI-generated output, inform clients when AI materially affects representation, and ensure cited authorities are not fabricated by AI tools. The public comment period closed May 5.<ref name="aba">[https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/california-bar-proposes-first-ai-specific-changes-to-ethics-rules ABA Journal: State Bar of California proposes first AI-specific changes to ethics rules]</ref> | |||
''See full article: [[News-California-Bar-AI-Ethics-Rules-2026|May 6, 2026 — California Bar Proposes First AI-Specific Ethics Rules]]'' | |||
---- | |||
== Eighth Circuit Strikes Down FCC Broadband Anti-Discrimination Rule == | |||
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously struck down on May 6, 2026 the FCC rules prohibiting discrimination in broadband access, ruling the agency exceeded its statutory authority. The three-judge panel held that Congress did not authorize disparate impact liability under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and that the FCC improperly extended rules beyond broadband providers to contractors and infrastructure owners. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr welcomed the decision, while Public Knowledge criticized the ruling for eliminating protections addressing documented disparities in broadband access for lower-income communities.<ref name="arst">[https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/court-strikes-down-fcc-anti-discrimination-rule-opposed-by-internet-providers/ Ars Technica: Court strikes down FCC anti-discrimination rule opposed by Internet providers]</ref> | |||
''See full article: [[News-FCC-Digital-Discrimination-Rule-Struck-Down-2026|May 6, 2026 — Eighth Circuit Strikes Down FCC Broadband Anti-Discrimination Rule]]'' | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| Line 53: | Line 80: | ||
[[Category:Cases Against Anthropic]] | [[Category:Cases Against Anthropic]] | ||
[[Category:Corporate Governance]] | [[Category:Corporate Governance]] | ||
[[Category:Data Privacy]] | |||
[[Category:International]] | |||
[[Category:Canada]] | |||
[[Category:Cases Against OpenAI]] | |||