Cases: Difference between revisions

Line 58:

=== Insurance Coverage Cases ===

* ''[[Citizens Insurance Company of America v Wynndalco Enterprises|Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Wynndalco Enterprises, LLC]]'' (7th Cir.) — Duty to defend biometric-privacy claims involving Clearview AI’s facial-recognition technology.

=== AI-Assisted Insurance Benefit Decisions ===

* ''[[Estate of Gene B. Lokken v UnitedHealth Group|Estate of Gene B. Lokken v. UnitedHealth Group]]'' (D. Minn.) — Proposed class action challenging alleged use of nH Predict to terminate Medicare Advantage post-acute-care coverage.

=== Employment Discrimination Cases ===

* ''[[Doe Employees v Meta Platforms Inc|Doe Employees v. Meta Platforms Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Current and former employees allege AI-assisted layoff decisions discriminated against workers with disabilities or protected leave.

* ''[[Mobley v Workday Inc|Mobley v. Workday Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Alleged discrimination by automated hiring tools; June 22 and July 1, 2026 orders narrowed claims and directed an amended complaint; July 28, 2026: discovery limits upheld for protected customer applicant data.<ref name="mobley-july28">[https://app.midpage.ai/document/mobley-v-workday-inc--b8b19144-13a2-4f5a-92be-4559bd46275b Mobley v. Workday, No. 3:23-cv-00770, order denying relief from nondispositive pretrial order, July 28, 2026, Judge Rita F. Lin (full order reproduced by Midpage).]</ref>

* ''[[Mobley v Workday Inc|Mobley v. Workday Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Alleged discrimination by automated hiring tools; June 22 and July 1, 2026 orders narrowed claims and directed an amended complaint; July 28, 2026: discovery limits upheld for protected customer applicant data.

=== Antitrust Cases ===

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 === Insurance Coverage Cases ===
 * ''[[Citizens Insurance Company of America v Wynndalco Enterprises|Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. Wynndalco Enterprises, LLC]]'' (7th Cir.) — Duty to defend biometric-privacy claims involving Clearview AI’s facial-recognition technology.
+=== AI-Assisted Insurance Benefit Decisions ===
+* ''[[Estate of Gene B. Lokken v UnitedHealth Group|Estate of Gene B. Lokken v. UnitedHealth Group]]'' (D. Minn.) — Proposed class action challenging alleged use of nH Predict to terminate Medicare Advantage post-acute-care coverage.
 === Employment Discrimination Cases ===
 * ''[[Doe Employees v Meta Platforms Inc|Doe Employees v. Meta Platforms Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Current and former employees allege AI-assisted layoff decisions discriminated against workers with disabilities or protected leave.
-* ''[[Mobley v Workday Inc|Mobley v. Workday Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Alleged discrimination by automated hiring tools; June 22 and July 1, 2026 orders narrowed claims and directed an amended complaint; July 28, 2026: discovery limits upheld for protected customer applicant data.<ref name="mobley-july28">[https://app.midpage.ai/document/mobley-v-workday-inc--b8b19144-13a2-4f5a-92be-4559bd46275b Mobley v. Workday, No. 3:23-cv-00770, order denying relief from nondispositive pretrial order, July 28, 2026, Judge Rita F. Lin (full order reproduced by Midpage).]</ref>
+* ''[[Mobley v Workday Inc|Mobley v. Workday Inc.]]'' (N.D. Cal.) — Alleged discrimination by automated hiring tools; June 22 and July 1, 2026 orders narrowed claims and directed an amended complaint; July 28, 2026: discovery limits upheld for protected customer applicant data.
 === Antitrust Cases ===