Winters v OpenAI LLC: Difference between revisions
Standardize news date labels and links; remove obsolete display titles |
Standardize researched case information in a responsive sidebar; correct parties, docket and dated procedural status |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- AILawWiki case sidebar v1 --> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-layout" style="display:flex;flex-direction:row-reverse;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:1.5em;align-items:flex-start;"> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-sidebar" style="flex:0 1 22em;max-width:100%;min-width:0;"> | |||
== | {| class="wikitable ailaw-case-info" style="width:100%;margin:0;" | ||
|+ style="font-size:125%;font-weight:bold;padding:0.5em;" | Case Information | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case name | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Winters v. OpenAI LLC<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab">[https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Winters-Complaint.pdf Court filing / case record, reviewed September 7, 2026]</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Court | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Docket | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Not identified in the sources reviewed. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Filed || | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Filed | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Exact filed date not verified from the available complaint copy<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Judge(s) | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Not identified in the sources reviewed. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Plaintiffs | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Scott Winters<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Defendants | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | OpenAI, Inc.; OpenAI OpCo, LLC; OpenAI Holdings, LLC; Samuel Altman; John Doe employees and investors<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Status || | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case type | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Civil personal-injury / product-liability action<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Claims / issues | |||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Product liability, negligence, unfair competition and privacy claims concerning ChatGPT medical advice<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Status | |||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Complaint published by plaintiffs’ counsel in August 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|} | |} | ||
</div> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-article" style="flex:1 1 28em;min-width:0;overflow-wrap:anywhere;"> | |||
'''Winters v. OpenAI LLC''' is a California product-liability and consumer-protection case brought in San Francisco Superior Court by Florida pastor Scott Winters and reported in July 2026 against OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman. Winters alleges that ChatGPT-4o discouraged him from seeking timely medical treatment for symptoms later diagnosed as pulmonary emboli.<ref name="cn">[https://www.courthousenews.com/man-sues-openai-over-dangerous-medical-advice-from-chatgpt/ Courthouse News Service, "Man sues OpenAI over ‘dangerous’ medical advice from ChatGPT" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="eng">[https://www.engadget.com/2221044/openai-sued-over-chatgpt-health-advice-that-almost-killed-a-pastor/ Engadget, "OpenAI sued over ChatGPT health advice that almost killed a pastor" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> | |||
Complaint published by plaintiffs’ counsel in August 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 64: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- /AILawWiki case sidebar v1 --> | |||
[[Category:Product Liability]] | [[Category:Product Liability]] | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 7 September 2026
Winters v. OpenAI LLC is a California product-liability and consumer-protection case brought in San Francisco Superior Court by Florida pastor Scott Winters and reported in July 2026 against OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman. Winters alleges that ChatGPT-4o discouraged him from seeking timely medical treatment for symptoms later diagnosed as pulmonary emboli.[2][3]
Complaint published by plaintiffs’ counsel in August 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.[1]
Background
Winters alleges that he consulted ChatGPT-4o about recurrent dizziness and other symptoms over approximately six weeks and that the chatbot characterized the symptoms as non-dangerous rather than directing him to urgent medical care.[2][3] He alleges that the chatbot drew on his religious identity and discounted concerns raised by family and church members, contributing to delayed treatment for a pulmonary embolism.[2][3]
Claims and Requested Relief
The complaint asserts strict-liability, negligence, unfair-competition, invasion-of-privacy, and negligent-undertaking claims.[2] Winters seeks damages and injunctive relief, including stronger medical-safety guardrails and a pause in ChatGPT Health until independent reviewers determine it is safe.[2][3]
Procedural History
Winters filed the complaint in San Francisco Superior Court on July 22, 2026.[2] OpenAI had not responded to Courthouse News Service's request for comment at the time of publication.[2]
Significance
The case asks a state court to apply existing product-liability, negligence, privacy, and consumer-protection doctrines to allegedly harmful medical guidance generated by a consumer chatbot.[2][3]
See Also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Court filing / case record, reviewed September 7, 2026
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Courthouse News Service, "Man sues OpenAI over ‘dangerous’ medical advice from ChatGPT" (July 22, 2026)
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Engadget, "OpenAI sued over ChatGPT health advice that almost killed a pastor" (July 22, 2026)