Jump to content

UMG Recordings Inc v Suno Inc: Difference between revisions

From AI Law Wiki
Create case page — broke circular redirect with UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc.
Tag: Removed redirect
Update Suno case with amended DMCA stream-ripping claim
Line 20: Line 20:
|-
|-
! Claims
! Claims
| Copyright infringement (mass-scale copying of copyrighted sound recordings)
| Copyright infringement (mass-scale copying of copyrighted sound recordings); DMCA Section 1201 anti-circumvention claim<ref name="suno-amended-complaint">[https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/files/2026/08/gov.uscourts.mad_.272063.277.0_1.pdf U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, amended complaint, filed August 25, 2026]</ref>
|-
|-
! Status
! Status
Line 30: Line 30:
== Allegations ==
== Allegations ==
The plaintiffs — including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and other major labels — allege that Suno copied millions of copyrighted sound recordings to train its AI music generation models. The labels argue this constitutes mass copyright infringement on an unprecedented scale.
The plaintiffs — including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and other major labels — allege that Suno copied millions of copyrighted sound recordings to train its AI music generation models. The labels argue this constitutes mass copyright infringement on an unprecedented scale.
The August 25 amended complaint alleges that Suno used YT-DL and YT-DLP to bypass YouTube’s “rolling cipher” and obtain recordings for its training data.<ref name="suno-amended-complaint" /><ref name="cmu-suno-aug28">[https://completemusicupdate.com/universal-and-sony-file-amended-suno-lawsuit-after-judge-gives-all-clear-to-add-stream-ripping-claims/ Complete Music Update, “Universal and Sony file amended Suno lawsuit after judge gives all clear to add stream ripping claims,” August 28, 2026]</ref>


== Settlement Status ==
== Settlement Status ==
Line 38: Line 40:
* '''2025''' — Discovery and motion practice
* '''2025''' — Discovery and motion practice
* '''April 2026''' — Warner Music Group settles; UMG and Sony reach settlement impasse
* '''April 2026''' — Warner Music Group settles; UMG and Sony reach settlement impasse
* '''August 18, 2026''' — Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV permits UMG and Sony to add a DMCA Section 1201 stream-ripping claim but denies their request to add 61,026 recordings.<ref name="cmu-suno-aug28" />
* '''August 25, 2026''' — UMG and Sony file the amended complaint.<ref name="suno-amended-complaint" />


== Significance ==
== Significance ==
Line 54: Line 58:
[[Category:Cases Against Suno]]
[[Category:Cases Against Suno]]
[[Category:Music Industry]]
[[Category:Music Industry]]
[[Category:DMCA]]

Revision as of 19:35, 28 August 2026

Case Name UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc.
Docket 1:24-cv-11611
Court U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Filed June 24, 2024
Plaintiffs UMG Recordings, Inc., Sony Music Entertainment, and other major record labels
Defendant Suno, Inc.
Claims Copyright infringement (mass-scale copying of copyrighted sound recordings); DMCA Section 1201 anti-circumvention claim[1]
Status Active — Settlement impasse with UMG/Sony; Warner Music settled separately

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc. is a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by major record labels against AI music generation company Suno, alleging that Suno trained its AI models on vast quantities of copyrighted sound recordings without authorization.

Allegations

The plaintiffs — including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and other major labels — allege that Suno copied millions of copyrighted sound recordings to train its AI music generation models. The labels argue this constitutes mass copyright infringement on an unprecedented scale.

The August 25 amended complaint alleges that Suno used YT-DL and YT-DLP to bypass YouTube’s “rolling cipher” and obtain recordings for its training data.[1][2]

Settlement Status

In April 2026, Warner Music Group reached a landmark licensing deal with Suno, becoming the first major label to settle. However, Universal Music Group and Sony Music have reached an impasse in settlement negotiations, with disputes over licensing fees and terms. The litigation continues for the non-settling labels while the Warner deal reshapes the AI music licensing landscape.

Procedural History

  • June 24, 2024 — Complaint filed in District of Massachusetts
  • 2025 — Discovery and motion practice
  • April 2026 — Warner Music Group settles; UMG and Sony reach settlement impasse
  • August 18, 2026 — Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV permits UMG and Sony to add a DMCA Section 1201 stream-ripping claim but denies their request to add 61,026 recordings.[2]
  • August 25, 2026 — UMG and Sony file the amended complaint.[1]

Significance

This case is one of the most important AI copyright disputes in the music industry, alongside the parallel case against Udio. The outcome will help define whether AI training on copyrighted music constitutes fair use and establish licensing frameworks for AI-generated music.

See Also

References