|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''April 22, 2026''' — Daily digest of AI law developments.
| | #REDIRECT [[News-April-22-2026]] |
| | |
| This article consolidates 8 news stories from April 22, 2026.
| |
| | |
| == Contents ==
| |
| | |
| 1. Blackburn Trump America AI Act Momentum April
| |
| 2. California AB 2027 AI Worker Data
| |
| 3. California AB 2653 Sweatfree AI Code
| |
| 4. California AB 2713 AI Transparency Act Adjustment
| |
| 5. California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations
| |
| 6. California AI Bills Committee April 22
| |
| 7. California Appropriations Advances AI Bills April
| |
| 8. California SB 1142 Digital Dignity Act Judiciary
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Blackburn Trump America AI Act Momentum April ==
| |
| | |
| ''''Blackburn Announces Momentum for TRUMP AMERICA AI Act with Industry Endorsements'''
| |
| | |
| On '''April 22, 2026''', U.S. Senator '''Marsha Blackburn''' (R-Tenn.) announced growing momentum for her '''TRUMP AMERICA AI Act''' discussion draft, highlighting endorsements from conservative leaders, creative community advocates, and child protection groups.<ref name="blackburn-momentum">[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2026/4/ai/what-they-are-saying-blackburn-announces-growing-momentum-for-trump-america-ai-act Sen. Marsha Blackburn, "What They Are Saying: Blackburn Announces Growing Momentum for Trump America AI Act" (April 22, 2026)]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Background ==
| |
| | |
| The TRUMP AMERICA AI Act discussion draft was originally released on [[March 18, 2026]], to codify President Trump's [[December 11, 2025]] Executive Order establishing a national AI policy framework.<ref name="blackburn-draft">[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2026/3/technology/blackburn-releases-discussion-draft-of-national-policy-framework-for-artificial-intelligence/3b3b6458-b6c7-478b-9859-374949586765 Sen. Marsha Blackburn, "Blackburn Releases Discussion Draft of National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence" (March 18, 2026)]</ref><ref name="white-house-framework">[https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2026/03/20/national-policy-framework-for-artificial-intelligence/ White House, "National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence" (March 20, 2026)]</ref>
| |
| | |
| The legislation aims to create a single federal rulebook for AI that addresses six core objectives from the White House framework: protecting children, safeguarding communities, supporting creators, preventing censorship, enabling innovation, and developing an AI-ready workforce.<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/>
| |
| | |
| == Blackburn Statement ==
| |
| | |
| Senator Blackburn stated:
| |
| | |
| :''President Trump's AI framework rightfully calls on Congress to create one rulebook for AI that protects children, safeguards American communities, supports creators, prevents censorship, enables innovation, and develops an AI-ready workforce. Now, it's Congress' turn to develop the White House framework into legislation that can pass both the House and Senate so that we can codify President Trump's agenda, protect Americans, and unleash AI innovation.''<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/>
| |
| | |
| == Industry and Advocacy Endorsements ==
| |
| | |
| The April 22 announcement highlighted support from organizations focused on the "4 Cs" — '''children, creators, conservatives, and communities''':
| |
| | |
| '''Daniel Colson, Executive Director of the AI Policy Network,''' praised the bill's provisions for collecting data on adverse AI incidents and creating AI testbeds for national standards development. Colson stated: ''The TRUMP AMERICA AI Act enhances and encourages accountability in AI development... The United States leads the world in AI. This legislation extends our competitive advantage while preparing for AI systems of unprecedented scope and capability.''<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/>
| |
| | |
| '''Donna Rice Hughes, CEO/President of Enough Is Enough,''' endorsed the child protection elements: ''I applaud Senator Blackburn for her leadership on this important matter for the sake of the children, America and advancing the Golden Digital Age.''<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/>
| |
| | |
| '''RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America)''' expressed gratitude for the bill's copyright protections: ''RIAA is deeply grateful to Senator Marsha Blackburn for putting forward a national rulebook in her America-first AI discussion draft. This legislation offers a thoughtful and comprehensive framework to advance American AI innovation while ensuring that the creators indispensable to our culture are protected from having their work used in unlicensed training... It safeguards all Americans against nonconsensual deepfakes and voice clones.''<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/>
| |
| | |
| == Legislative Context ==
| |
| | |
| The TRUMP AMERICA AI Act incorporates provisions from Blackburn's previous legislation, including the Kids Online Safety Act and the NO FAKES Act, which address child safety online and nonconsensual AI-generated depictions.<ref name="blackburn-momentum"/><ref name="global-policy-watch">[https://www.globalpolicywatch.com/2026/03/white-house-blackburn-introduce-visions-of-comprehensive-federal-ai-policy/ Wiley Rein LLP, "White House and Blackburn Introduce Visions of Comprehensive Federal AI Policy" (March 28, 2026)]</ref>
| |
| | |
| The bill is positioned as a response to the "patchwork of state laws" that have emerged following California's AI regulations, with federal preemption provisions designed to provide regulatory certainty for AI developers.<ref name="global-policy-watch"/>
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| * [[News TRUMP-AMERICA-AI-Act-2026|TRUMP AMERICA AI Act]]
| |
| * [[News White-House-National-Policy-Framework-AI-2026|White House National Policy Framework for AI]]
| |
| * [[News AI-Foundation-Model-Transparency-Act-2026|AI Foundation Model Transparency Act]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News Blackburn-Trump-America-AI-Act-Momentum-April-2026|Blackburn Trump America AI Act Momentum April]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California AB 2027 AI Worker Data ==
| |
| | |
| April 22, 2026 — California AB 2027 Advances to Appropriations, Banning Employer Use of Worker Data to Train Replacement AI
| |
| | |
| The California Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection approved '''Assembly Bill 2027''' on April 22, 2026, sending the bill to the Appropriations Committee. Introduced by Assembly Member Ward, AB 2027 prohibits employers from using a worker's personal information to train AI systems designed to replicate, automate, or replace that worker's job functions.
| |
| | |
| == Key Provisions ==
| |
| | |
| *'''Worker data protection''': Prohibits employers from using a worker's personal information to train AI systems intended to replicate, automate, or replace a worker's job duties.<ref name="tcapr24">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 AI Legislative Update April 24, 2026 — Transparency Coalition]</ref>
| |
| | |
| *'''Data sale restriction''': Prevents the sale of worker personal information to third parties for the purpose of training AI systems that could replicate or replace worker functions.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == Legislative Progress ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2027 was approved by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection and sent to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations on April 22, 2026.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == Context ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2027 is part of a broader package of California AI bills advancing in April 2026, alongside AB 2713 (AI Transparency Act adjustment), AB 2653 (Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct), and AB 2575 (AI in healthcare). The legislation responds to growing concerns about AI-driven workforce displacement and the use of employee data — including performance metrics, communications, and work product — to develop automation tools that could replace the workers who generated that data.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-AB-2713-AI-Transparency-Act-Adjustment-2026|California AB 2713 — AI Transparency Act Adjustment]]
| |
| * [[News California-AB-2653-Sweatfree-AI-Code-2026|California AB 2653 — Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct]]
| |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-AB-2027-AI-Worker-Data-2026|California AB 2027 AI Worker Data]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California AB 2653 Sweatfree AI Code ==
| |
| | |
| April 22, 2026 — California AB 2653 Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct Advances Through Assembly Committees
| |
| | |
| Two California Assembly committees have approved '''Assembly Bill 2653''', which establishes a '''Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct''' for state contracts involving AI products that require data enrichment services. The bill addresses growing concerns about labor exploitation in AI training data supply chains.
| |
| | |
| == Key Provisions ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2653 adds AI product contracts requiring data enrichment services to existing contractor responsibility programs, imposing several new requirements on vendors supplying AI products to the state:
| |
| | |
| *'''Certification requirement''': Bidders on state AI contracts must certify that nothing furnished to the state has been laundered or produced by sweatshop labor, forced labor, or other prohibited labor practices.<ref name="ab2653text">[https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260ab2653 AB 2653 Bill Text — CalMatters Digital Democracy]</ref>
| |
| | |
| *'''Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct''': The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) must develop and implement a Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct by '''July 1, 2027''', to be signed by all bidders on state contracts and subcontracts.<ref name="tcapr24">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 AI Legislative Update April 24, 2026 — Transparency Coalition]</ref>
| |
| | |
| *'''Advisory panel''': An advisory panel must be established with a majority of members being trade union and civil society organization experts who volunteer their time to help develop the code.<ref name="ab2653text" />
| |
| | |
| *'''Independent monitoring''': The code must establish a process for independent monitoring and complaint investigations conducted by the DIR, bona fide labor organizations, or nonprofit organizations meeting specific governance criteria.<ref name="ab2653text" />
| |
| | |
| *'''Subcontractor requirements''': Contractors must ensure their subcontractors adhere to the Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct requirements where applicable laws are absent or insufficient.<ref name="ab2653text" />
| |
| | |
| == Legislative Progress ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2653 was approved by two Assembly committees before being sent to Appropriations:
| |
| | |
| *'''Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment''': Approved 11-1 on April 8, 2026<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| *'''Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection''': Approved on April 22, 2026<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| Following these approvals, the bill was sent to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations on April 22, 2026, with a recommendation to the consent calendar.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == Context ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2653 is believed to be the first US legislation to specifically address labor conditions in AI data enrichment supply chains. Workers who label, annotate, and curate training data for AI systems — often based in East Africa and Southeast Asia — have reported low wages, psychological harm from exposure to violent content, and poor working conditions. The bill extends California's existing Sweatfree Code of Conduct framework, which previously covered goods and services, to explicitly include AI products.<ref name="ab2653text" />
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-AB-2713-AI-Transparency-Act-Adjustment-2026|California AB 2713 — AI Transparency Act Adjustment]]
| |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations]]
| |
| * [[News California-Appropriations-Advances-AI-Bills-April-2026|California Appropriations Advances AI Bills]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-AB-2653-Sweatfree-AI-Code-2026|California AB 2653 Sweatfree AI Code]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California AB 2713 AI Transparency Act Adjustment ==
| |
| | |
| April 22, 2026 — California AB 2713 Advances to Assembly Floor, Adjusting AI Transparency Act Provenance Requirements
| |
| | |
| The California Assembly Policy and Procedure Committee approved '''Assembly Bill 2713''' by a 15-0 vote on April 22, 2026, ordering the bill to third reading on the Assembly floor. The legislation adjusts the '''California AI Transparency Act''' (SB 942, operative August 2, 2026) by broadening how online platforms must handle AI content provenance data and increasing civil penalties.
| |
| | |
| == Key Changes to the AI Transparency Act ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2713 modifies several provisions of SB 942, which requires large online platforms to display provenance data and digital signatures indicating AI-generated content:
| |
| | |
| *'''Disclosure language''': Changes the requirement from displaying whether provenance data or digital signatures "are available" to whether they "are embedded into, attached to, or otherwise associated with the content," broadening the scope of what platforms must disclose.<ref name="ab2713text">[https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260ab2713 AB 2713 Bill Text — CalMatters Digital Democracy]</ref>
| |
| | |
| *'''Inspection of provenance data''': Expands inspection access beyond data compliant with specific standards bodies to '''any system provenance data''' embedded in or associated with content, allowing inspection via: (1) direct display in the platform's UI, (2) downloadable content with attached data, or (3) links to data on the platform's site or third-party apps.<ref name="ab2713text" /><ref name="tcapr24">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 AI Legislative Update April 24, 2026 — Transparency Coalition]</ref>
| |
| | |
| *'''Prohibition on stripping data''': Revises the ban on stripping provenance data to specifically prohibit removing such data "downloaded from the platform," closing a potential loophole in the original act.<ref name="ab2713text" />
| |
| | |
| *'''Civil penalties''': Increases the per-violation civil penalty to '''$5,500'''.<ref name="ab2713text" />
| |
| | |
| == Legislative Progress ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2713 was approved by the Assembly Policy and Procedure Committee on April 22, 2026 (15-0) and ordered to third reading. The bill aims to broaden detection and access to provenance data beyond strict standards compliance, addressing concerns that the original SB 942 requirements were too narrow in how platforms could present AI content metadata.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == Context ==
| |
| | |
| AB 2713 is one of several California AI bills advancing through the legislature in April 2026. Other bills moving forward include AB 2575 (AI in healthcare), AB 2653 (Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct), and AB 2027 (worker data protection). The California Legislature is intensifying committee hearings as key appropriations deadlines approach.<ref name="tcapr24" />
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-SB-1000-AI-Content-Provenance-2026|California SB 1000 — AI Content Provenance Bill]]
| |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations]]
| |
| * [[News California-Appropriations-Advances-AI-Bills-April-2026|California Appropriations Advances AI Bills]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-AB-2713-AI-Transparency-Act-Adjustment-2026|California AB 2713 AI Transparency Act Adjustment]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations ==
| |
| | |
| On April 22, 2026, several California artificial intelligence bills advanced from policy committees to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, moving to the fiscal phase of the legislative process.<ref>[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition - AI Legislative Update April 24, 2026]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Bills Advancing ==
| |
| | |
| === AB 2027 (Ward) — Worker Data Protection ===
| |
| Assembly Bill 2027, authored by Assemblymember Matt Ward (D-San Diego), would restrict California local government employers from using worker data to train AI systems that could automate or replace jobs. The bill specifically prohibits the use of employee data for training AI tools when the goal is to eventually automate that job.<ref>[https://trackbill.com/s3/bills/CA/2025/AB/2027 California AB 2027 - TrackBill]</ref>
| |
| | |
| The bill passed the Assembly Labor and Employment Committee and now moves to Appropriations for fiscal review.
| |
| | |
| === AB 2575 (Ortega) — AI in Health Care ===
| |
| Assembly Bill 2575, authored by Assemblymember Liz Ortega (D-San Leandro), establishes safeguards for AI and clinical decision support systems in health care settings. The bill:
| |
| * Prohibits AI developers from evading liability by claiming a health care worker's failure to override an AI output severs their liability for harm caused
| |
| * Mandates transparency notices requiring health facilities to inform users how AI tools work, their limitations, data sources, and known risks
| |
| * Protects workers' rights to override AI outputs based on their professional judgment without employer retaliation
| |
| * Requires patient disclaimers when generative AI is used for clinical communications<ref>[https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260ab2575 California AB 2575 - Digital Democracy]</ref>
| |
| | |
| Hospital groups have opposed the bill as overly broad.<ref>[https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260ab2575 California AB 2575 Legislative Analysis]</ref>
| |
| | |
| === AB 2653 (Lee) — Sweatfree AI Code of Conduct ===
| |
| Assembly Bill 2653, authored by Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-San Jose), extends California's existing Sweatfree Code of Conduct to state contracts involving AI products that require data enrichment services. The bill:
| |
| * Mandates the Department of Industrial Relations to update its contractor responsibility program by July 1, 2027
| |
| * Requires bidders on relevant state contracts to certify no goods are produced by sweatshop labor, forced labor, or exploitative labor laundering in AI data enrichment supply chains
| |
| * Defines sweatshop labor as work violating minimum standards on wages, safe conditions, discrimination/harassment, and just cause termination
| |
| * Establishes an advisory panel (majority from trade unions and civil society) to help develop the code
| |
| * Requires independent monitoring of complaints by DIR, labor organizations, or qualifying nonprofits<ref>[https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202520260ab2653 California AB 2653 - Digital Democracy]</ref>
| |
| | |
| The bill targets exploitative labor often found in global AI data labeling supply chains.
| |
| | |
| == Earlier Committee Advancement: SB 1142 ==
| |
| | |
| Senate Bill 1142, the Digital Dignity Act authored by Senator Josh Becker (D-Menlo Park), also advanced from committee earlier in April 2026. The bill:
| |
| * Strengthens penalties for defamation or false impersonation using AI-generated digital replicas
| |
| * Requires large online platforms creating and hosting generative AI content to provide mechanisms for individuals to remove unauthorized digital replicas
| |
| * Imposes enhanced liability including liquidated damages of $1,000 or actual damages for each violation by distributors with actual knowledge
| |
| * Requires generative AI providers to maintain records for at least 90 days to comply with court orders
| |
| * Enables enforcement by city attorneys or the Attorney General<ref>[https://sd13.senate.ca.gov/news/press-release/february-19-2026/senator-becker-introduces-digital-dignity-act-to-protect California Senate Press Release - SB 1142]</ref>
| |
| | |
| The Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee advanced SB 1142 after debate over free speech and takedown rules.<ref>[https://citizenportal.ai/articles/7796012/california/legislative/senate/california-state-senate/committee-advances-digital-dignity-act-after-debate-over-free-speech-and-takedown-rules Citizen Portal - Digital Dignity Act Committee Action]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Next Steps ==
| |
| | |
| All four bills now move to the Appropriations Committee, the final committee hurdle before potential floor votes. The Appropriations Committee will review the fiscal impact of each bill before determining whether they advance to the full Assembly (for AB measures) or Senate (for SB 1142).
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| * [[Legislation]]
| |
| * [[California]]
| |
| * [[State Legislation]]
| |
| * [[Employment]]
| |
| * [[Healthcare AI]]
| |
| * [[Deepfakes]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California AI Bills Committee April 22 ==
| |
| | |
| '''April 22, 2026 — California Advances Wave of AI Bills Through Committees, Covering Healthcare, Chatbot Safety, Workers, and Provenance'''
| |
| | |
| California's legislative committees advanced a significant number of AI-related bills on April 21–22, 2026, as the spring committee hearing season moves into high gear in Sacramento. The bills cover AI in healthcare, chatbot safety, worker protections, content provenance, advertising disclosure, and personal data rights.<ref name="tcai">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition, "AI Legislative Update — April 24, 2026"]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Healthcare AI ==
| |
| | |
| '''AB 1979''', sponsored by Assemblymember Bonta, concerns the use of AI in healthcare services. Approved by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection and sent to Appropriations on April 22.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''AB 2575''', sponsored by Assemblymember Ortega, also concerns the use of AI in healthcare. The Committee on Labor and Employment approved it 11-1 on April 8, and the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection approved it on April 22, sending it to Appropriations.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 903''', sponsored by Senator Padilla and Senator Rubio, concerns the use of AI and transcription of patient information in professional mental health therapy. Now with Senate Rules Committee, with a hearing set for April 13.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| == Chatbot Safety ==
| |
| | |
| '''AB 1609''', sponsored by Assemblymember Zbur, concerns customer service chatbots. Approved by Privacy and Consumer Protection and sent to Appropriations on April 22.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''AB 1988''', the Preventing AI User Self Endangerment (PAUSE) Act sponsored by Assemblymember Pellerin, concerns AI chatbot safety. Approved by the Health Committee and sent to Appropriations on April 22.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''AB 2023''' and '''SB 1119''' are companion bills concerning chatbots and children's safety. AB 2023 was approved by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection on April 21, sent to Assembly Appropriations. The Senate version, SB 1119, was approved by Senate Judiciary and referred to Appropriations on April 21. Sponsored by Assemblymembers Bauer-Kahan and Wicks, and Senator Padilla.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 867''', sponsored by Senator Padilla and others, would prohibit the inclusion of companion chatbots in toys. Approved by the Committee on Privacy, Digital Tech, and Consumer Protection on April 7, sent to Appropriations, placed on suspense on April 20.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| == Worker Protections ==
| |
| | |
| '''AB 1883''', sponsored by Assemblymember Bryan, is a workplace surveillance bill. Passed by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection on April 20, sent to Appropriations.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''AB 1898''', sponsored by Assemblymember Schultz, would require employers to provide written notice to employees when a workplace AI tool is used to assist in employment-related decisions or to surveil the workplace. Approved by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection on March 25, sent to Judiciary Committee.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 947''', sponsored by Senator McNerney and Senator Reyes, would establish worker protections regarding the use of AI and automated decision systems. Sent to Appropriations on April 22.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 951''', sponsored by Senator Reyes, is a digital displacement notice bill requiring 90-day notice from covered employers before any technological displacement affecting 25% or more of the workforce. Approved by the Labor Committee on April 8 and by the Privacy and Digital Tech Committee on April 21, sent to Appropriations.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| == Content Provenance and Digital Replicas ==
| |
| | |
| '''SB 1111''', sponsored by Senator Ashby, concerns AI and digital replicas. The bill clarifies that false impersonation includes the use of a digital replica with the intent to impersonate another. Approved by the Public Safety Committee on April 22.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 1146''', sponsored by Senator Gonzalez, adds AI provisions to existing false advertising law around health-related consumer products. Passed by the Senate Privacy/Digital Tech Committee on April 7, passed by the Judiciary Committee on April 15, set for an Appropriations hearing on April 27.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 1159''', sponsored by Senator Cabaldon, specifies that for purposes of the California Public Records Act, terms like "person" and "member of the public" do not include AI systems, autonomous agents, or robots. Passed by Senate Judiciary on March 24, by Privacy Committee on April 7, ordered to third reading on April 8.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| == Data Privacy and Consumer Rights ==
| |
| | |
| '''AB 2169''', sponsored by Assemblymember Lowenthal, amends the CCPA to require AI model deployers/operators to allow consumers to request a copy of their personal information, contextual data, and social graph, with a five-business-day response requirement. Approved by the Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection on March 22, sent to Appropriations.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| '''SB 1104''', a data broker registration bill sponsored by Senator Cabaldon, was approved by the Privacy Committee on April 22, sent to Appropriations.<ref name="tcai" />
| |
| | |
| == Previously Covered Bills ==
| |
| | |
| Several bills that advanced on April 22 have already received dedicated coverage:
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-AB-2027-AI-Worker-Data-2026|AB 2027]] — Worker data protection
| |
| * [[News California-AB-2653-Sweatfree-AI-Code-2026|AB 2653]] — Sweat-free AI Code of Conduct
| |
| * [[News California-AB-2713-AI-Transparency-Act-Adjustment-2026|AB 2713]] — AI Transparency Act adjustment
| |
| * [[News California-SB-1142-Digital-Dignity-Act-Judiciary-2026|SB 1142]] — Digital Dignity Act
| |
| | |
| == Significance ==
| |
| | |
| California remains the most active state legislature on AI regulation in 2026, with over 30 AI-related bills in play. The April 21–22 committee hearings mark a critical inflection point, as bills that advance past Appropriations will move to floor votes in May. The breadth of California's approach — spanning healthcare, worker protections, chatbot safety, content provenance, advertising, and data privacy — contrasts with states that have focused on narrower AI domains.<ref name="tcai" /><ref name="cooley">[https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2026/2026-04-24-state-ai-laws-where-are-they-now Cooley, "State AI Laws: Where Are They Now?," April 24, 2026]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations Committee]]
| |
| * [[News California-SB-1000-AI-Content-Provenance-2026|California SB 1000 AI Content Provenance Bill Advances]]
| |
| * [[News California-Executive-Order-N-5-26-AI-Procurement-2026|California Executive Order N-5-26 on AI Procurement]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| | |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-AI-Bills-Committee-April-22-2026|California AI Bills Committee April 22]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California Appropriations Advances AI Bills April ==
| |
| | |
| On April 22, 2026, the California Legislature advanced multiple artificial intelligence bills to the Appropriations Committee, representing significant progress on workplace data protection, healthcare AI regulation, and supply chain transparency.<ref>[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition: AI Legislative Update, April 24, 2026]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == AB 2027 ==
| |
| | |
| Assembly Bill 2027, introduced by Assemblymember Ward, would prohibit employers from using workers' personal data to train artificial intelligence systems designed to replicate their jobs or to sell such data to third parties.
| |
| | |
| The bill was approved by the Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee and moved to the Appropriations Committee on April 22, 2026.
| |
| | |
| == AB 2575 ==
| |
| | |
| Assembly Bill 2575, introduced by Assemblymember Ortega, addresses the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery. The bill seeks to establish standards for AI systems used in medical diagnosis and treatment recommendations.
| |
| | |
| The bill was approved by the Labor and Employment Committee on April 8, 2026, and advanced to Appropriations on April 22, 2026.
| |
| | |
| == AB 2653 ==
| |
| | |
| Assembly Bill 2653, the Sweat-free AI Code of Conduct, introduced by Assemblymember Lee, would require state AI contractors to certify that their systems were not developed using sweatshop or forced labor. The bill was approved by two committees and sent to Appropriations on April 22, 2026.
| |
| | |
| == SB 1000 ==
| |
| | |
| Senate Bill 1000, introduced by Senator Becker, addresses AI use in emergency services and public safety contexts. The bill was approved by the Governmental Organization Committee on April 16, 2026.
| |
| | |
| == Context ==
| |
| | |
| These advancements come as California continues to lead US states in AI legislation. Earlier in 2026, California enacted bills on deepfake extortion (SB 1015) and established an AI Safety Commission (SB 813).
| |
| | |
| The bills face review by the Appropriations Committee, which will assess their fiscal impact before potential floor votes.
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-March-2026]]
| |
| * [[News California-Washington-Advance-AI-Bills-April-2026]]
| |
| * [[Legislation]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| | |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-Appropriations-Advances-AI-Bills-April-2026|California Appropriations Advances AI Bills April]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == California SB 1142 Digital Dignity Act Judiciary ==
| |
| | |
| California's '''SB 1142''', the '''Digital Dignity Act''', sponsored by Senator Josh Becker (D-Menlo Park), passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 22, 2026, advancing to the Appropriations Committee. The bill was re-referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on April 23, 2026, following second reading and amendment. The bill extends protections against unauthorized AI-generated digital replicas to all California residents and imposes new obligations on large online platforms.<ref name="becker">[https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1142 California SB 1142 Bill Text]</ref><ref name="transparency">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition, "AI Legislative Update — April 24, 2026"]</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Background ==
| |
| | |
| Senator Becker introduced SB 1142 on February 19, 2026, building on his prior California AI Transparency Act (SB 942, signed in 2024). The bill addresses gaps in existing California law, which primarily protects performers and deceased individuals from unauthorized use of their likeness, by extending digital replica protections to all residents.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| == Key Provisions ==
| |
| | |
| === Revocation Mechanism ===
| |
| Platforms must provide a tool for users to revoke access to their digital replica created by others at any time. A court order can enforce revocation requests.<ref name="transparency" /><ref name="becker" />
| |
| | |
| === Terms of Service and Reporting ===
| |
| Platforms' terms must prohibit unlawful digital replicas and must establish a reporting mechanism and response process for violations.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| === Takedown Requirements ===
| |
| Upon court order, platforms must remove or cease distribution of violating content within two business days.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| === Enhanced Liability ===
| |
| The bill adds penalties for distributors with actual knowledge of replicas violating criminal impersonation, defamation, or right-of-publicity laws.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| === Recordkeeping ===
| |
| Generative AI providers must retain records for at least 90 days to comply with court orders from city attorneys or the Attorney General.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| === Clarification of Crimes ===
| |
| SB 1142 explicitly includes digital replicas in false impersonation laws under California Penal Code, making it clear that using a digital replica to impersonate someone constitutes fraud.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| == Legislative History ==
| |
| | |
| * '''February 19, 2026''': Introduced by Senator Becker<ref name="becker" />
| |
| * '''April 6-7, 2026''': Heard in Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| * '''April 22, 2026''': Passed Senate Judiciary Committee 12-0; sent to Appropriations<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| == Criticism ==
| |
| | |
| Groups including the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) have raised First Amendment concerns, arguing that the notice-and-takedown process risks over-removal of protected speech like satire without judicial review.<ref name="transparency" />
| |
| | |
| == Related Bills ==
| |
| | |
| * [[News California-Washington-Advance-AI-Bills-April-2026|California and Washington Advance New AI Bills (April 8, 2026)]] — Earlier SB 1142 coverage
| |
| * [[News California-AI-Bills-Advance-to-Appropriations-2026|California AI Bills Advance to Appropriations (April 22, 2026)]]
| |
| * [[News California-SB-1015-Deepfake-Extortion-2026|California SB 1015 Deepfake Extortion]]
| |
| * [[News California-SB-813-AI-Safety-Commission-2026|California SB 813 AI Safety Commission]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| | |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| ''See individual article: [[News California-SB-1142-Digital-Dignity-Act-Judiciary-2026|California SB 1142 Digital Dignity Act Judiciary]]''
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Categories ==
| |
| | |
| [[Category:AI Authorship]]
| |
| [[Category:Advertising]]
| |
| [[Category:California]]
| |
| [[Category:Chatbot Regulation]]
| |
| [[Category:Child Safety]]
| |
| [[Category:Congress]]
| |
| [[Category:Consumer Protection]]
| |
| [[Category:Copyright Law]]
| |
| [[Category:Data Privacy]]
| |
| [[Category:Deepfakes]]
| |
| [[Category:Employment]]
| |
| [[Category:Executive Branch]]
| |
| [[Category:Federal Legislation]]
| |
| [[Category:Healthcare AI]]
| |
| [[Category:State Legislation]]
| |
| [[Category:Transparency]]
| |
| [[Category:Daily News]]
| |