News-May-07-2026: Difference between revisions

From AI Law Wiki
(Update May 7 digest: add Meta Section 230 verdict and Chrome Gemini Nano stories)
(Remove incorrect categories (Cases Against xAI - xAI is plaintiff; Cases Against Google - no litigation), add Cases Against Apple)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
4. Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict
4. Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict
5. Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent
5. Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent
6. Apple Agrees to $250 Million AI Siri Settlement
7. Colorado Advances SB-189 to Rewrite AI Law


----
----
Line 12: Line 14:
== DOJ Files Formal Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law ==
== DOJ Files Formal Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law ==


The U.S. Department of Justice filed a formal '''Complaint in Intervention''' on May 5, 2026, in '''''xAI Corp v. Weiser''''', escalating the federal government's opposition to Colorado's SB 24-205 (the Colorado AI Act). The filing goes beyond the DOJ's earlier April 24 Statement of Interest, making the United States a formal party to the case. The DOJ argues that Colorado's algorithmic discrimination provisions violate the Equal Protection Clause and conflict with federal AI policy. Separately, a federal judge on April 27 paused enforcement of SB 24-205 pending further proceedings.<ref name="doj">[https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-intervenes-xai-lawsuit-challenging-colorados-algorithmic-discrimination DOJ: Justice Department Intervenes in xAI Lawsuit]</ref><ref name="jenner">[https://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/client-alerts/doj-joins-xai-in-lawsuit-challenging-colorado-ai-act Jenner & Block: DOJ Joins xAI in Lawsuit Challenging Colorado AI Act]</ref>
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a formal '''Complaint in Intervention''' on May 5, 2026, in '''''xAI Corp v. Weiser''''', escalating the federal government's opposition to Colorado's SB 24-205 (the Colorado AI Act). The filing goes beyond the DOJ's earlier April 24 Statement of Interest, making the United States a formal party to the case. The DOJ argues that Colorado's algorithmic discrimination provisions violate the Equal Protection Clause and conflict with federal AI policy. Separately, a federal judge on April 27 paused enforcement of SB 24-205 pending further proceedings.<ref name="doj">[https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-intervenes-xai-lawsuit-challenging-colorados-algorithmic-discrimination DOJ: Justice Department Intervenes in xAI Lawsuit]</ref><ref name="jenner">[https://btlaw.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/doj-intervenes-in-lawsuit-challenging-colorados-algorithmic-discrimination-law Baker Tilly: DOJ Intervenes in Lawsuit Challenging Colorado AI Law]</ref>


''See full article: [[News-DOJ-Complaint-xAI-Colorado-May-2026|May 5, 2026 — DOJ Files Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law]]''
''See full article: [[News-DOJ-Complaint-xAI-Colorado-May-2026|May 5, 2026 — DOJ Files Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law]]''
Line 28: Line 30:
== Anthropic Signs Compute Deal With SpaceX ==
== Anthropic Signs Compute Deal With SpaceX ==


'''Anthropic''' announced on May 7, 2026 that it has signed an agreement with '''SpaceX''' to access all of the compute capacity at Colossus 1, one of the world's largest AI supercomputers. The deal provides Anthropic with over 300 MW of capacity and more than 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, substantially expanding the company's AI inference capabilities. In conjunction with the deal, Anthropic doubled Claude Code's five-hour rate limits for paid plans and removed peak-hours reductions for Pro and Max plans. The partnership comes amid Anthropic's ongoing dispute with the U.S. government over a supply-chain risk designation, and raises questions about the competitive dynamics between Musk's xAI/SpaceX and Anthropic, which has positioned itself as an AI safety-focused alternative.<ref name="anthropic">[https://www.anthropic.com/news/higher-limits-spacex Anthropic: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX]</ref><ref name="reuters-spx">[https://www.reuters.com/science/spacexai-give-anthropic-access-its-massive-ai-supercomputer-2026-05-06/ Reuters: SpaceX to give Anthropic access to its massive AI supercomputer]</ref><ref name="axios">[https://www.axios.com/2026/05/06/anthropic-spacex-elon-musk-compute Axios: Anthropic will get compute capacity from Elon Musk's SpaceX]</ref>
'''Anthropic''' announced on May 7, 2026 that it has signed an agreement with '''SpaceX''' to access all of the compute capacity at Colossus 1, one of the world's largest AI supercomputers. The deal provides Anthropic with over 300 MW of capacity and more than 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, substantially expanding the company's AI inference capabilities. In conjunction with the deal, Anthropic doubled Claude Code's five-hour rate limits for paid plans and removed peak-hours reductions for Pro and Max plans. The partnership comes amid Anthropic's ongoing dispute with the U.S. government over a supply-chain risk designation, and raises questions about the competitive dynamics between Musk's xAI/SpaceX and Anthropic, which has positioned itself as an AI safety-focused alternative.<ref name="anthropic">[https://www.anthropic.com/news/higher-limits-spacex Anthropic: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX]</ref><ref name="reuters-spx">[https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/06/anthropic-spacex-data-center-capacity.html CNBC: Anthropic, SpaceX announce compute deal, includes space data center capacity]</ref><ref name="axios">[https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-spacex-compute-deal-colossus/ Wired: Anthropic Gets in Bed With SpaceX as the AI Race Turns Weird]</ref>


----
----
Line 34: Line 36:
== Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict ==
== Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict ==


'''Meta Platforms''' asked a Los Angeles judge on May 6, 2026, to throw out the landmark social media addiction verdict or order a new trial, arguing that '''Section 230''' of the Communications Decency Act shields it from liability and that the jury's finding was based on the content the plaintiff viewed rather than platform design features. The March 2026 jury verdict had found Meta liable for '''$4.2 million''' and Google for '''$1.8 million''' for negligently designing platforms that harmed a young woman's mental health. Google has also asked the court to set aside the verdict and plans to appeal. The case is the first bellwether trial in a coordinated proceeding involving thousands of similar lawsuits, and the Section 230 defense could reach the Ninth Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.<ref name="reuters-meta">[https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/meta-asks-california-judge-throw-out-landmark-social-media-addiction-verdict-2026-05-06/ Reuters: Meta asks California judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict]</ref><ref name="cna">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/meta-asks-california-judge-throw-out-landmark-social-media-addiction-verdict-6104981 Channel News Asia: Meta asks judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict]</ref>
'''Meta Platforms''' asked a Los Angeles judge on May 6, 2026, to throw out the landmark social media addiction verdict or order a new trial, arguing that '''Section 230''' of the Communications Decency Act shields it from liability and that the jury's finding was based on the content the plaintiff viewed rather than platform design features. The March 2026 jury verdict had found Meta liable for '''$4.2 million''' and Google for '''$1.8 million''' for negligently designing platforms that harmed a young woman's mental health. Google has also asked the court to set aside the verdict and plans to appeal. The case is the first bellwether trial in a coordinated proceeding involving thousands of similar lawsuits, and the Section 230 defense could reach the Ninth Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.<ref name="reuters-meta">[https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/meta-asks-california-judge-throw-191444251.html Yahoo Finance: Meta asks California judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict]</ref><ref name="cna">[https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/meta-asks-california-judge-throw-out-landmark-social-media-addiction-verdict-6104981 Channel News Asia: Meta asks judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict]</ref>


''See full article: [[News-Meta-Section-230-Addiction-Verdict-May-2026|May 6, 2026 — Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Social Media Addiction Verdict]]''
''See full article: [[News-Meta-Section-230-Addiction-Verdict-May-2026|May 6, 2026 — Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Social Media Addiction Verdict]]''
Line 42: Line 44:
== Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent ==
== Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent ==


Privacy researchers revealed that '''Google Chrome''' has been silently downloading a '''4 GB AI model''' (Gemini Nano) to hundreds of millions of users' devices without consent, notice, or functional opt-out. Forensic analysis by privacy researcher Alexander Hanff confirmed that Chrome profiles accumulated the model within 14 minutes of creation with zero human interaction, and that Chrome automatically re-downloads the model if deleted. Chrome 147's "AI Mode" omnibox pill creates a misleading impression that queries are processed on-device, when in fact AI Mode sends all queries to Google's cloud servers. The installation may violate the EU GDPR and ePrivacy Directive, and a German court ruling in March 2025 established precedent that browser-installed code requires informed user consent.<ref name="privacyguy">[https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chrome-silent-nano-install/ That Privacy Guy: Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent]</ref><ref name="9to5">[https://9to5google.com/2026/05/06/google-chrome-4gb-storage-ai-details/ 9to5Google: Google Chrome 4GB AI storage, Gemini Nano details]</ref><ref name="techspot">[https://www.techspot.com/news/112309-google-chrome-has-silently-pushing-4gb-ai-model.html TechSpot: Google Chrome has been silently pushing a 4GB AI model]</ref>
Privacy researchers revealed that '''Google Chrome''' has been silently downloading a '''4 GB AI model''' (Gemini Nano) to hundreds of millions of users' devices without consent, notice, or functional opt-out. Forensic analysis by privacy researcher Alexander Hanff confirmed that Chrome profiles accumulated the model within 14 minutes of creation with zero human interaction, and that Chrome automatically re-downloads the model if deleted. Chrome 147's "AI Mode" omnibox pill creates a misleading impression that queries are processed on-device, when in fact AI Mode sends all queries to Google's cloud servers. The installation may violate the EU GDPR and ePrivacy Directive, and a German court ruling in March 2025 established precedent that browser-installed code requires informed user consent.<ref name="privacyguy">[https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chrome-silent-nano-install/ That Privacy Guy: Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent]</ref><ref name="9to5">[https://9to5google.com/2026/05/06/google-chrome-4gb-storage-ai-details/ 9to5Google: Google Chrome 4GB AI storage, Gemini Nano details]</ref><ref name="techspot">[https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/chrome-installing-4gb-ai-model-gemini-nano/ CNET: Google Chrome Might Have Installed an AI Model Onto Your Device]</ref>


''See full article: [[News-Google-Chrome-Gemini-Nano-Privacy-May-2026|May 7, 2026 — Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano Without Consent]]''
''See full article: [[News-Google-Chrome-Gemini-Nano-Privacy-May-2026|May 7, 2026 — Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano Without Consent]]''


----
== Apple Agrees to $250 Million AI Siri Settlement ==
'''Apple''' agreed to pay '''$250 million''' to settle a class action lawsuit accusing it of misleading consumers about '''Siri AI capabilities''' during the iPhone 16 launch. The lawsuit alleged Apple promoted personalized Siri features powered by Apple Intelligence that were significantly delayed, violating consumer protection and false advertising laws. The settlement provides $25-$95 per eligible device for approximately 36 million iPhones purchased between June 2024 and March 2025. Apple admitted no wrongdoing, stating it settled to avoid further litigation costs.<ref name="bbc-apple">[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0j2nydnzy7o BBC: Apple to pay $250m to iPhone buyers over AI features lawsuit]</ref><ref name="guardian-apple">[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/05/apple-siri-ai-settlement The Guardian: Apple agrees to pay $250m over claims it misled buyers on Siri AI features]</ref>
''See full article: [[News-Apple-Siri-Settlement-May-2026|May 5, 2026 — Apple Agrees to $250 Million Settlement Over AI Siri Claims]]''
----
== Colorado Advances SB-189 to Rewrite AI Law ==
'''Colorado lawmakers''' advanced '''SB 26-189''' on May 5, 2026, a compromise bill to replace the state's contested '''SB 24-205''' comprehensive AI regulation. The bill removes mandatory bias audit and disclosure requirements while retaining consumer notification and appeal rights for consequential AI decisions (hiring, loans, housing). The effective date would be pushed from June 30, 2026 to January 1, 2027. The rewrite comes amid '''xAI Corp v. Weiser''', in which a federal court issued a TRO blocking SB 24-205 enforcement on April 27. The bill received unanimous committee approval with the legislative session ending May 13.<ref name="yah-col">[https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/colorado-lawmakers-move-replace-contentious-184152107.html Yahoo: Colorado Lawmakers Move to Replace Contentious AI Law With New Rules]</ref><ref name="copol">[https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/05/04/colorado-lawmakers-advance-rewrite-of-2024-law-to-regulate-artificial-intelligence/ Colorado Politics: Colorado lawmakers advance rewrite of 2024 law to regulate artificial intelligence]</ref>
''See full article: [[News-Colorado-SB-189-AI-Compromise-2026|May 2, 2026 — Colorado SB-189: AI Law Rewrite Compromise]]''
----
----


Line 57: Line 73:
[[Category:Colorado]]
[[Category:Colorado]]
[[Category:Cases Against OpenAI]]
[[Category:Cases Against OpenAI]]
[[Category:Cases Against xAI]]
 
[[Category:Consumer Protection]]
[[Category:Consumer Protection]]
[[Category:Cases Against Meta]]
[[Category:Cases Against Meta]]
[[Category:Cases Against Google]]
 
[[Category:Data Privacy]]
[[Category:Data Privacy]]
[[Category:Settlements]]
[[Category:Advertising]]
[[Category:Cases Against Apple]]

Latest revision as of 18:13, 7 May 2026

May 7, 2026 — Daily digest of AI law developments.

Contents

1. DOJ Files Formal Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law 2. Shivon Zilis Testifies in Musk v. Altman Trial 3. Anthropic Signs Compute Deal With SpaceX 4. Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict 5. Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent 6. Apple Agrees to $250 Million AI Siri Settlement 7. Colorado Advances SB-189 to Rewrite AI Law

DOJ Files Formal Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a formal Complaint in Intervention on May 5, 2026, in xAI Corp v. Weiser, escalating the federal government's opposition to Colorado's SB 24-205 (the Colorado AI Act). The filing goes beyond the DOJ's earlier April 24 Statement of Interest, making the United States a formal party to the case. The DOJ argues that Colorado's algorithmic discrimination provisions violate the Equal Protection Clause and conflict with federal AI policy. Separately, a federal judge on April 27 paused enforcement of SB 24-205 pending further proceedings.[1][2]

See full article: May 5, 2026 — DOJ Files Complaint in Intervention Against Colorado AI Law

Shivon Zilis Testifies in Musk v. Altman Trial

Shivon Zilis, former OpenAI board member and the mother of four of Elon Musk's children, testified for hours on May 6, 2026, in the ongoing Musk v. Altman trial in Oakland. Zilis pushed back on OpenAI's characterization of her relationship with Musk as a secret allegiance, testifying that her relationship with Musk did not influence her duties as a board member. She confirmed that Musk had offered her the opportunity to use his sperm for conception. Zilis left the OpenAI board in 2023 after Musk started xAI. Her testimony came on the same day that former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati testified that Sam Altman "sowed chaos and distrust" among senior leadership.[3][4][5]

See full article: May 6, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Trial Day 6: Zilis and Murati Testify

Anthropic Signs Compute Deal With SpaceX

Anthropic announced on May 7, 2026 that it has signed an agreement with SpaceX to access all of the compute capacity at Colossus 1, one of the world's largest AI supercomputers. The deal provides Anthropic with over 300 MW of capacity and more than 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, substantially expanding the company's AI inference capabilities. In conjunction with the deal, Anthropic doubled Claude Code's five-hour rate limits for paid plans and removed peak-hours reductions for Pro and Max plans. The partnership comes amid Anthropic's ongoing dispute with the U.S. government over a supply-chain risk designation, and raises questions about the competitive dynamics between Musk's xAI/SpaceX and Anthropic, which has positioned itself as an AI safety-focused alternative.[6][7][8]

Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Landmark Social Media Addiction Verdict

Meta Platforms asked a Los Angeles judge on May 6, 2026, to throw out the landmark social media addiction verdict or order a new trial, arguing that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields it from liability and that the jury's finding was based on the content the plaintiff viewed rather than platform design features. The March 2026 jury verdict had found Meta liable for $4.2 million and Google for $1.8 million for negligently designing platforms that harmed a young woman's mental health. Google has also asked the court to set aside the verdict and plans to appeal. The case is the first bellwether trial in a coordinated proceeding involving thousands of similar lawsuits, and the Section 230 defense could reach the Ninth Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.[9][10]

See full article: May 6, 2026 — Meta Asks Judge to Overturn Social Media Addiction Verdict

Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano AI Model Without Consent

Privacy researchers revealed that Google Chrome has been silently downloading a 4 GB AI model (Gemini Nano) to hundreds of millions of users' devices without consent, notice, or functional opt-out. Forensic analysis by privacy researcher Alexander Hanff confirmed that Chrome profiles accumulated the model within 14 minutes of creation with zero human interaction, and that Chrome automatically re-downloads the model if deleted. Chrome 147's "AI Mode" omnibox pill creates a misleading impression that queries are processed on-device, when in fact AI Mode sends all queries to Google's cloud servers. The installation may violate the EU GDPR and ePrivacy Directive, and a German court ruling in March 2025 established precedent that browser-installed code requires informed user consent.[11][12][13]

See full article: May 7, 2026 — Google Chrome Silently Installs 4GB Gemini Nano Without Consent

Apple Agrees to $250 Million AI Siri Settlement

Apple agreed to pay $250 million to settle a class action lawsuit accusing it of misleading consumers about Siri AI capabilities during the iPhone 16 launch. The lawsuit alleged Apple promoted personalized Siri features powered by Apple Intelligence that were significantly delayed, violating consumer protection and false advertising laws. The settlement provides $25-$95 per eligible device for approximately 36 million iPhones purchased between June 2024 and March 2025. Apple admitted no wrongdoing, stating it settled to avoid further litigation costs.[14][15]

See full article: May 5, 2026 — Apple Agrees to $250 Million Settlement Over AI Siri Claims

Colorado Advances SB-189 to Rewrite AI Law

Colorado lawmakers advanced SB 26-189 on May 5, 2026, a compromise bill to replace the state's contested SB 24-205 comprehensive AI regulation. The bill removes mandatory bias audit and disclosure requirements while retaining consumer notification and appeal rights for consequential AI decisions (hiring, loans, housing). The effective date would be pushed from June 30, 2026 to January 1, 2027. The rewrite comes amid xAI Corp v. Weiser, in which a federal court issued a TRO blocking SB 24-205 enforcement on April 27. The bill received unanimous committee approval with the legislative session ending May 13.[16][17]

See full article: May 2, 2026 — Colorado SB-189: AI Law Rewrite Compromise

References

  1. ↑ DOJ: Justice Department Intervenes in xAI Lawsuit
  2. ↑ Baker Tilly: DOJ Intervenes in Lawsuit Challenging Colorado AI Law
  3. ↑ BBC: Former OpenAI board member says Elon Musk offered her sperm donations
  4. ↑ Yahoo: Mother of four of Musk's children, Shivon Zilis, takes the stand
  5. ↑ Wired: How Shivon Zilis Operated as Elon Musk's OpenAI Insider
  6. ↑ Anthropic: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
  7. ↑ CNBC: Anthropic, SpaceX announce compute deal, includes space data center capacity
  8. ↑ Wired: Anthropic Gets in Bed With SpaceX as the AI Race Turns Weird
  9. ↑ Yahoo Finance: Meta asks California judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict
  10. ↑ Channel News Asia: Meta asks judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict
  11. ↑ That Privacy Guy: Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent
  12. ↑ 9to5Google: Google Chrome 4GB AI storage, Gemini Nano details
  13. ↑ CNET: Google Chrome Might Have Installed an AI Model Onto Your Device
  14. ↑ BBC: Apple to pay $250m to iPhone buyers over AI features lawsuit
  15. ↑ The Guardian: Apple agrees to pay $250m over claims it misled buyers on Siri AI features
  16. ↑ Yahoo: Colorado Lawmakers Move to Replace Contentious AI Law With New Rules
  17. ↑ Colorado Politics: Colorado lawmakers advance rewrite of 2024 law to regulate artificial intelligence
Retrieved from "https://ailawwiki.com/index.php?title=News-May-07-2026&oldid=1051"