|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''April 6, 2026''' — A coalition of independent musicians has filed a lawsuit against Google in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the tech giant's Lyria 3 AI music model was trained on over 44 million copyrighted clips (280,000 hours) from YouTube without proper compensation or consent.<ref name="mbw">{{cite web |url=https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/indie-artists-sue-google-claiming-it-used-youtubes-own-catalog-to-train-lyria-3-ai-music-tool/ |title=Indie Artists Sue Google, Claiming It Used YouTube's Own Catalog to Train Lyria 3 AI Music Tool |publisher=Music Business Worldwide |date=March 2026 |accessdate=April 7, 2026}}</ref><ref name="rostr">{{cite web |url=https://hq.rostr.cc/insider/news/indie-artists-file-suit-against-google-over-lyria-3-training |title=Indie Artists File Suit Against Google Over Lyria 3 Training |publisher=Rostr |date=March 2026 |accessdate=April 7, 2026}}</ref><ref name="dmn">{{cite web |url=https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2026/03/09/indie-artist-coalition-google-lawsuit-ai/ |title=Indie Artist Coalition Files Major Lawsuit Against Google |publisher=Digital Music News |date=March 9, 2026 |accessdate=April 7, 2026}}</ref>
| | #REDIRECT [[News March 09 2026]] |
| | |
| == Overview ==
| |
| | |
| The 118-page complaint, filed March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 1:26-cv-02582), claims Google DeepMind copied millions of copyrighted sound recordings, musical compositions, and lyrics to develop Lyria 3.<ref name="mbw" /><ref name="rostr" /> The model launched publicly on February 18, 2026, via the Gemini chatbot app for over 750 million monthly users and generates up to 30-second audio clips with vocals and lyrics from text prompts or uploaded images and videos.<ref name="mbw" />
| |
| | |
| == Background ==
| |
| | |
| Plaintiffs argue Google had the resources to license rights legally but chose not to, gaining unfair leverage over artists, labels, and publishers.<ref name="mbw" /> They cite Google's prior MusicLM project (completed 2023), which was withheld due to legal risks like cultural appropriation.<ref name="mbw" /> Unlike the major label lawsuits against Suno and Udio, this case focuses specifically on independent artists who historically have less leverage in licensing negotiations with large platforms.<ref name="dmn" />
| |
| | |
| == Context ==
| |
| | |
| This lawsuit joins a growing roster of AI music copyright cases, including the major label cases against Suno and Udio, and comes as courts are beginning to grapple with foundational questions about whether training AI models on copyrighted works constitutes fair use.<ref name="mbw" /><ref name="dmn" />
| |
| | |
| == See Also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[Kogon v Google LLC|Kogon v. Google LLC]] — Case page for this litigation
| |
| * [[Cases]] — Active AI litigation tracker
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| | |
| <references />
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Copyright Litigation]]
| |
| [[Category:Music Industry]]
| |
| [[Category:Cases Against Google]]
| |
