Winters v OpenAI LLC: Difference between revisions
Standardize researched case information in a responsive sidebar; correct parties, docket and dated procedural status |
Reconcile defendant names with reviewed court-stamped complaint caption |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Docket | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Docket | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | | | style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | CGC-26-639579<ref name="queue-winters">[https://lawsuit.center/case-filings/winters-v-openai-complaint.pdf Winters complaint, No. CGC-26-639579, court-stamped August 3, 2026, p. 1]</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Filed | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Filed | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | | | style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | August 3, 2026 (date stamped on the reviewed complaint)<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Judge(s) | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Judge(s) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Defendants | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Defendants | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | OpenAI, Inc.; OpenAI OpCo, LLC; OpenAI Holdings, LLC; Samuel Altman; John Doe employees and investors<ref name=" | | style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | OpenAI Foundation (formerly OpenAI, Inc.); OpenAI Group PBC (formerly OpenAI OpCo, LLC); OpenAI Holdings, LLC; Samuel Altman; John Doe employees and investors<ref name="queue-winters" /> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case type | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case type | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Status | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Status | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | | | style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Reviewed complaint court-stamped August 3, 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Reviewed complaint court-stamped August 3, 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Procedural History == | == Procedural History == | ||
The reviewed complaint bears a San Francisco Superior Court filing stamp dated August 3, 2026 and case number CGC-26-639579.<ref name="queue-winters" /> The July-dated news reports linked here predate that stamp and do not establish the filing date of this copy. OpenAI had not responded to Courthouse News Service's request for comment at the time of publication.<ref name="cn" /> | |||
== Significance == | == Significance == | ||