Winters v OpenAI LLC: Difference between revisions
Standardize news date labels and links; remove obsolete display titles |
Reconcile defendant names with reviewed court-stamped complaint caption |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- AILawWiki case sidebar v1 --> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-layout" style="display:flex;flex-direction:row-reverse;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:1.5em;align-items:flex-start;"> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-sidebar" style="flex:0 1 22em;max-width:100%;min-width:0;"> | |||
== | {| class="wikitable ailaw-case-info" style="width:100%;margin:0;" | ||
|+ style="font-size:125%;font-weight:bold;padding:0.5em;" | Case Information | |||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case name | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Winters v. OpenAI LLC<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab">[https://techjusticelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Winters-Complaint.pdf Court filing / case record, reviewed September 7, 2026]</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Court | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Docket | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | CGC-26-639579<ref name="queue-winters">[https://lawsuit.center/case-filings/winters-v-openai-complaint.pdf Winters complaint, No. CGC-26-639579, court-stamped August 3, 2026, p. 1]</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Filed || | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Filed | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | August 3, 2026 (date stamped on the reviewed complaint)<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Judge(s) | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Not identified in the sources reviewed. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Plaintiffs | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Scott Winters<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Defendants | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | OpenAI Foundation (formerly OpenAI, Inc.); OpenAI Group PBC (formerly OpenAI OpCo, LLC); OpenAI Holdings, LLC; Samuel Altman; John Doe employees and investors<ref name="queue-winters" /> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Status || | ! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Case type | ||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Civil personal-injury / product-liability action<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Claims / issues | |||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Product liability, negligence, unfair competition and privacy claims concerning ChatGPT medical advice<ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row" style="width:30%;text-align:left;vertical-align:top;" | Status | |||
| style="vertical-align:top;overflow-wrap:anywhere;" | Reviewed complaint court-stamped August 3, 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
|} | |} | ||
</div> | |||
<div class="ailaw-case-article" style="flex:1 1 28em;min-width:0;overflow-wrap:anywhere;"> | |||
'''Winters v. OpenAI LLC''' is a California product-liability and consumer-protection case brought in San Francisco Superior Court by Florida pastor Scott Winters and reported in July 2026 against OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman. Winters alleges that ChatGPT-4o discouraged him from seeking timely medical treatment for symptoms later diagnosed as pulmonary emboli.<ref name="cn">[https://www.courthousenews.com/man-sues-openai-over-dangerous-medical-advice-from-chatgpt/ Courthouse News Service, "Man sues OpenAI over ‘dangerous’ medical advice from ChatGPT" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="eng">[https://www.engadget.com/2221044/openai-sued-over-chatgpt-health-advice-that-almost-killed-a-pastor/ Engadget, "OpenAI sued over ChatGPT health advice that almost killed a pastor" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> | |||
Reviewed complaint court-stamped August 3, 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.<ref name="queue-winters" /><ref name="case-record-24eb2accee59bbab" /> | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| Line 28: | Line 52: | ||
== Procedural History == | == Procedural History == | ||
The reviewed complaint bears a San Francisco Superior Court filing stamp dated August 3, 2026 and case number CGC-26-639579.<ref name="queue-winters" /> The July-dated news reports linked here predate that stamp and do not establish the filing date of this copy. OpenAI had not responded to Courthouse News Service's request for comment at the time of publication.<ref name="cn" /> | |||
== Significance == | == Significance == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 64: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- /AILawWiki case sidebar v1 --> | |||
[[Category:Product Liability]] | [[Category:Product Liability]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:36, 7 September 2026
Winters v. OpenAI LLC is a California product-liability and consumer-protection case brought in San Francisco Superior Court by Florida pastor Scott Winters and reported in July 2026 against OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman. Winters alleges that ChatGPT-4o discouraged him from seeking timely medical treatment for symptoms later diagnosed as pulmonary emboli.[3][4]
Reviewed complaint court-stamped August 3, 2026; subsequent docket developments not verified.[2][1]
Background
Winters alleges that he consulted ChatGPT-4o about recurrent dizziness and other symptoms over approximately six weeks and that the chatbot characterized the symptoms as non-dangerous rather than directing him to urgent medical care.[3][4] He alleges that the chatbot drew on his religious identity and discounted concerns raised by family and church members, contributing to delayed treatment for a pulmonary embolism.[3][4]
Claims and Requested Relief
The complaint asserts strict-liability, negligence, unfair-competition, invasion-of-privacy, and negligent-undertaking claims.[3] Winters seeks damages and injunctive relief, including stronger medical-safety guardrails and a pause in ChatGPT Health until independent reviewers determine it is safe.[3][4]
Procedural History
The reviewed complaint bears a San Francisco Superior Court filing stamp dated August 3, 2026 and case number CGC-26-639579.[2] The July-dated news reports linked here predate that stamp and do not establish the filing date of this copy. OpenAI had not responded to Courthouse News Service's request for comment at the time of publication.[3]
Significance
The case asks a state court to apply existing product-liability, negligence, privacy, and consumer-protection doctrines to allegedly harmful medical guidance generated by a consumer chatbot.[3][4]
See Also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Court filing / case record, reviewed September 7, 2026
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Winters complaint, No. CGC-26-639579, court-stamped August 3, 2026, p. 1
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Courthouse News Service, "Man sues OpenAI over ‘dangerous’ medical advice from ChatGPT" (July 22, 2026)
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Engadget, "OpenAI sued over ChatGPT health advice that almost killed a pastor" (July 22, 2026)