Jump to content

United States v RealPage Inc

From AI Law Wiki
Revision as of 23:35, 18 September 2026 by AILawWikiAdmin (talk | contribs) (Add antitrust case article to the Cases category)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

AI-generated text. This page was generated using artificial intelligence.

Case Information
Case name United States of America, et al. v. RealPage, Inc., et al.[1]
Court U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina[1]
Docket 1:24-cv-00710[1]
Filed August 23, 2024 (original complaint).[2] Amended complaint naming Pinnacle: January 7, 2025.[1]
Judge(s) Not identified in the sources reviewed.
Plaintiffs United States and state co-plaintiffs.[1]
Defendants RealPage and landlord defendants, including Pinnacle Property Management Services, LLC.[1]
Case type Civil antitrust enforcement.[1]
Claims / issues Alleged Sherman Act section 1 violations involving Pinnacle’s information-sharing and pricing coordination.[1]
Status September 18, 2026: notice invites comments on Pinnacle’s proposed settlement; final approval not established.[1]

United States v. RealPage, Inc. is federal antitrust litigation concerning alleged information-sharing and algorithmic rent coordination. This article covers the September 2026 proposed settlement with defendant Pinnacle Property Management Services, LLC; the government's allegations are not findings of liability.[3]

Pinnacle proposed settlement

DOJ announced the proposed consent decree on September 4, 2026. If approved, it would restrict Pinnacle’s use of pricing algorithms incorporating competitors’ sensitive information and its information-sharing with other landlords, with compliance and cooperation provisions.[3]

September 18, 2026: public comment notice

The Federal Register published the proposed judgment and competitive impact statement on September 18, inviting public comments within 60 days of the notice.[1] The Tunney Act process requires public notice, consideration of comments and a court public-interest determination before entry of the proposed final judgment. Publication does not itself establish court approval.[4]

References