News April 24 2026 - Revision history

AILawWikiAdmin: Redirect to canonical hyphenated page name

2026-05-01T05:59:56Z

Redirect to canonical hyphenated page name

AILawWikiAdmin: Added Getty Images Stability AI ruling section

2026-04-30T23:00:06Z

Added Getty Images Stability AI ruling section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 30 April 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	5. SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit Against Adobe Executives		5. SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit Against Adobe Executives
	6. DOJ Joins xAI Challenge to Colorado AI Law		6. DOJ Joins xAI Challenge to Colorado AI Law
			7. Getty Images Stability AI Ruling

	----		----
Line 211:		Line 212:
	----		----

			== Getty Images Stability AI Ruling ==

			'''April 24, 2026''' — Judge Thompson Denies Most of Stability AI Motion to Dismiss in Getty Images Copyright Suit

			Judge '''Trina Thompson''' of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied most of '''Stability AI'''{{'}}s motion to dismiss '''Getty Images'''{{'}} copyright infringement complaint, allowing the bulk of Getty's claims to proceed to discovery and trial.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld-getty">[https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/?s=Getty+Images+mostly+wins ChatGPT is Eating the World, "Getty Images mostly wins, surviving motion to dismiss claims except for DMCA CMI claim. But can amend that claim in light of Judge Thompson's ruling," April 2026]</ref>

			The only claim dismissed was Getty's DMCA Section 1202(a) claim for intentional removal of copyright management information (CMI), which the court found lacked sufficient allegations of specific intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal infringement.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld-getty" />

			''See individual article: [[News Getty Images Stability AI Ruling 2026]]''

			----
	== Categories ==		== Categories ==

AILawWikiAdmin: Added Adobe shareholder derivative suit and DOJ xAI Colorado challenge sections

2026-04-30T22:35:14Z

Added Adobe shareholder derivative suit and DOJ xAI Colorado challenge sections

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 . Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban
 . State AI Legislation Week April 24
 ----
@@ Line 230: / Line 232: @@
 [[Category:Tennessee]]
 [[Category:Utah]]
 [[Category:Daily News]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Migration export

2026-04-28T02:34:16Z

Migration export

New page

'''April 24, 2026''' — Daily digest of AI law developments.

This article consolidates 4 news stories from April 24, 2026.

== Contents ==

1. Cooley State AI Laws Update April
2. House Jailbroken AI Demo Federal Framework
3. Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban
4. State AI Legislation Week April 24

----

== Cooley State AI Laws Update April ==

Law firm Cooley published an analysis on '''April 24, 2026''' titled "State AI Laws – Where Are They Now?" examining how state AI legislation is undergoing significant changes as compliance deadlines in 2026 approach and federal preemption efforts threaten to reshape state-level initiatives.<ref name="cooley">[https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2026/2026-04-24-state-ai-laws-where-are-they-now Cooley: State AI Laws – Where Are They Now?, April 24, 2026]</ref>

== Key Findings ==

=== Existing Laws Undergoing Changes ===
Many state AI laws that passed in prior years have undergone significant changes or delays since their passage, as states revise or reconsider their regulatory frameworks in response to practical implementation challenges and federal pressure.<ref name="cooley" />

=== Federal Preemption Threat ===
The White House is urging Congress to enact sweeping AI legislation to preempt certain state laws that risk stifling innovation. The federal action is "potentially threatening to reshape or constrain state-level initiatives" according to the analysis.<ref name="cooley" />

=== Colorado SB 205 ===
The alert provides detailed coverage of Colorado's comprehensive AI regime enacted in May 2024, which regulates "high-risk artificial intelligence systems" used in "consequential decisions" and imposes broad obligations on developers and deployers related to risk management, impact assessments, consumer disclosures, and reporting to the Colorado attorney general. Proposed amendments signal movement away from the broad "high-risk AI" framework toward a narrower, decision-focused model, with a June 30, 2026 compliance deadline.<ref name="cooley" />

The Colorado AI Working Group has proposed replacing the existing framework with a disclosure-driven approach, as covered in the [[News Colorado-AI-Act-Working-Group-Revision-2026|Colorado AI Working Group Revision]] story.

== Recommendations ==

The alert emphasizes that companies should prepare for compliance under current state frameworks while tracking legislative developments that could reshape obligations in the near term, given the dynamic interplay between federal preemption efforts and state legislative activity.<ref name="cooley" />

== References ==

<references />

''See individual article: [[News Cooley-State-AI-Laws-Update-April-2026|Cooley State AI Laws Update April]]''

----

== House Jailbroken AI Demo Federal Framework ==

'''April 24, 2026''' — The U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security held a bipartisan, closed-door demonstration for House lawmakers showcasing the risks of "jailbroken" AI models, as Congress considers a federal regulatory framework for artificial intelligence by the end of 2026.<ref name="homeland">[https://homeland.house.gov/2026/04/24/icymi-politico-house-lawmakers-get-a-chilling-demo-of-jailbroken-ai/ House Committee on Homeland Security, "ICYMI: Politico — House Lawmakers Get a 'Chilling' Demo of Jailbroken AI," April 24, 2026]</ref><ref name="federalnewswire">[https://thefederalnewswire.com/stories/681552539-house-committee-holds-demonstration-on-risks-of-jailbroken-artificial-intelligence-models Federal Newswire, "House Committee Holds Demonstration on Risks of Jailbroken Artificial Intelligence Models," April 24, 2026]</ref>

== The Demonstration ==

The demonstration, organized in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security's National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center ('''NCITE'''), allowed participants to interact with censored and "abliterated" AI models whose names were concealed.<ref name="homeland" /><ref name="federalnewswire" />

''Censored models'' — such as Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's ChatGPT — include built-in safety protections that refuse harmful queries. ''Abliterated models'' have their refusal mechanisms deactivated, enabling unrestricted outputs.<ref name="homeland" />

DHS researchers demonstrated how malicious actors can exploit unrestricted AI systems to obtain instructions for:
* Building bombs and weapons<ref name="homeland" />
* Planning terrorist attacks<ref name="homeland" />
* Launching cyberattacks<ref name="homeland" />
* Committing mass violence<ref name="homeland" />

Rep. Gabe Evans (R-Colo.) stated that jailbroken models "gave answers to all of those things" when asked how to make a nuclear bomb.<ref name="homeland" />

== Real-World Threat Examples ==

The briefing highlighted documented cases of AI exploitation by nation-state actors:<ref name="homeland" />

* '''Russia-linked groups''' hijacking leading AI models for disinformation campaigns
* '''Beijing-backed hackers''' attempting a fully automated cyberattack using Anthropic's Claude model — described as the first documented case of a fully AI-automated cyberattack

== Legislative Context ==

House Republican leadership aims to pass a '''federal regulatory framework for AI by the end of 2026'''.<ref name="punchbowl">[https://punchbowl.news/article/tech/house-gop-leadership-artificial-intelligence/ Punchbowl News, "House GOP Leadership on Artificial Intelligence," April 2026]</ref> The Trump administration's legislative framework proposes:<ref name="foxbaltimore">[https://foxbaltimore.com/news/nation-world/ai-blueprint-sets-up-clash-over-state-authority-and-faces-hurdles-in-congress-artificial-intelligence-regulation-child-safety-data-centers Fox Baltimore, "AI Blueprint Sets Up Clash Over State Authority," April 2026]</ref>

* Uniform federal safety guardrails
* Preemption of state-level AI laws
* Age-gating requirements and parental safeguards for children
* Provisions to reduce risks of chatbots encouraging self-harm or facilitating sexual exploitation of minors
* A '''Ratepayer Protection Pledge''' signed by major AI developers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google) addressing data center infrastructure and electricity costs

The federal preemption proposal has drawn opposition from states that have already enacted their own AI legislation. As of April 2026, 19 states have passed new AI laws, and many state lawmakers resist federal override of their consumer protection measures.<ref name="foxbaltimore" />

== Significance ==

The demonstration is part of a growing Congressional focus on AI safety, following the White House's release of its National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence in March 2026. The event underscores the tension between federal preemption advocates and states that have already enacted AI regulations, particularly regarding child safety, chatbot regulation, and deepfake protections.

== References ==
<references />

''See individual article: [[News House-Jailbroken-AI-Demo-Federal-Framework-2026|House Jailbroken AI Demo Federal Framework]]''

----

== Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban ==

'''April 24, 2026''' — The Minnesota House of Representatives passed '''HF 1606''', a landmark bill banning AI "nudification" technology that generates non-consensual nude or sexually explicit images from real people's photographs, by a vote of '''132-1'''.<ref name="cbs">[https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/minnesota-house-passes-bill-banning-nudification-technology/ CBS News Minnesota, Minnesota House passes bill banning nudification technology]</ref><ref name="petapixel">[https://petapixel.com/2026/04/24/minnesota-passes-landmark-bill-to-ban-ai-nudification-apps/ PetaPixel, Minnesota passes landmark bill to ban AI nudification apps]</ref>

== Overview ==

HF 1606, sponsored by Representative '''Jess Hanson''' (D), targets the growing problem of AI-powered "nudification" tools that create explicit images of individuals without their consent. The bill passed the House on April 24, 2026, and now awaits a vote in the Minnesota Senate. If enacted, it would be among the first state laws to explicitly ban nudification technology rather than merely penalizing the distribution of its output.<ref name="cbs" /><ref name="petapixel" />

== Key Provisions ==

=== Ban on Nudification Technology ===
The bill prohibits owners and controllers of websites, applications, and programs from:<ref name="houserec">[https://www.house.mn.gov/comm/docs/NhfWkIwNMEuQZzgZf0snYw.pdf Minnesota House Research, HF 1606 Summary]</ref>
* Allowing users to access or use nudification tools on their platforms
* Performing nudification on behalf of users
* Advertising or promoting nudification technology

=== Definition of "Nudify" ===
"Nudify" is defined as using artificial intelligence to depict the intimate parts of a person explicitly without their consent. The bill includes an exemption for tools requiring substantial human technological or artistic skill, meaning AI-assisted creative tools that require meaningful human direction would not be covered.<ref name="houserec" /><ref name="petapixel" />

=== Penalties and Remedies ===
* '''Civil penalties''' of up to '''$500,000''' for companies that violate the ban<ref name="petapixel" />
* '''Victims''' may sue for up to '''3x actual damages''', punitive damages, injunctions, and attorney fees<ref name="cbs" /><ref name="petapixel" />
* Private right of action allowing individuals harmed by nudification technology to seek relief in court

== Legislative History ==

* '''Introduced''': 2026 Minnesota legislative session
* '''April 24, 2026''': Passed House 132-1<ref name="cbs" />
* '''Next step''': Senate floor vote (companion bill progressing in Senate)<ref name="petapixel" />
* '''If passed''': Sent to Governor Tim Walz for signature

== Context ==

HF 1606 is part of a broader Minnesota legislative effort to address AI-enabled harms. A separate bill, '''HB 1887''', addresses deepfake protections more broadly and was approved by the House on April 20, 2026, currently pending in the Senate.<ref name="transparency">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition, AI Legislative Update — April 24, 2026]</ref>

The bill follows a national trend of states targeting AI-generated explicit content. Several states have enacted or are considering similar legislation, including Tennessee's ELVIS Act and California's deepfake criminalization laws. Minnesota's approach is notable for directly banning the technology itself rather than relying solely on penalizing distribution of AI-generated explicit images.

Minnesota's bill is also among the first to target the nudification technology market specifically, rather than treating all AI-generated explicit content identically. By distinguishing between fully automated nudification tools and human-directed artistic tools, the legislation attempts to preserve creative uses of AI while closing the loophole exploited by "clothing removal" apps and websites.

== See Also ==

* [[News Nebraska-LB-1185-Conversational-AI-Safety-Act-2026|Nebraska Enacts Conversational AI Safety Act]]
* [[News Tennessee-SB-1700-CHAT-Act-2026|Tennessee House Passes CHAT Act]]
* [[News California-SB-1015-Deepfake-Extortion-2026|California SB 1015 Deepfake Extortion]]

== References ==

<references />

''See individual article: [[News Minnesota-HF-1606-AI-Nudification-Ban-2026|Minnesota HF 1606 AI Nudification Ban]]''

----

== State AI Legislation Week April 24 ==

'''April 24, 2026''' — State AI legislation accelerated across the country this week, with Tennessee's CHAT Act and personhood bill heading to the governor, Hawaii moving three AI bills into reconciliation, Nebraska signing a chatbot safety law, and Alabama enacting AI insurance regulations as multiple state legislatures approach adjournment.<ref name="tcai-apr24">[https://www.transparencycoalition.ai/news/ai-legislative-update-april24-2026 Transparency Coalition, "AI Legislative Update — April 24, 2026"]</ref><ref name="troutman-apr20">[https://www.troutmanprivacy.com/2026/04/proposed-state-ai-law-update-april-20-2026/ Troutman Pepper, "Proposed State AI Law Update — April 20, 2026"]</ref>

== Tennessee: CHAT Act and Personhood Bill Head to Governor ==

The Tennessee General Assembly adjourned on April 24, 2026, sending two major AI bills to Governor Bill Lee's desk:

* '''SB 1700 (CHAT Act)''': Approved unanimously by the House on April 21 (90-0) after Senate passage on April 14 (31-0). The Curbing Harmful AI Technology Act establishes comprehensive chatbot safety and data privacy requirements. '''As of April 26, the bill awaits Governor Lee's signature.''' The governor has approximately until May 8 to sign or veto the bill before it becomes law without signature.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

* '''SB 837 (AI Personhood)''': Passed the Senate (26-6) on April 6 and the House (93-2) on April 8, then sent to the governor on April 15. '''As of April 26, the bill awaits Governor Lee's signature.''' The bill explicitly excludes AI systems from the legal definitions of "human being," "life," and "natural person" under Tennessee law.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

Governor Lee has already signed SB 1580, prohibiting AI from representing itself as a mental health professional.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

== Nebraska: Chatbot Safety Law Signed ==

Governor Jim Pillen signed '''LB 1185''', the Conversational Artificial Intelligence Safety Act, into law on April 17, 2026, after the legislature approved the bill 49-0 on April 10. The law, which was attached to the Agricultural Data Privacy Act (LB 525) as a legislative vehicle, becomes operative July 1, 2027. It establishes comprehensive consumer protections for publicly accessible conversational AI services, including disclosure requirements and safety protocols.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

Nebraska's legislature adjourned April 17.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

== Alabama: AI Insurance Regulation Enacted ==

Governor Kay Ivey signed '''SB 63''' on April 17, 2026, making Alabama the latest state to regulate AI use in health insurance coverage determinations. The law imposes requirements on health insurers using AI systems to make or support decisions regarding coverage, prior authorization, and claims processing. Alabama's legislature had adjourned ''sine die'' on April 9.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

== Hawaii: Three AI Bills Enter Reconciliation ==

Hawaii's legislature approved three AI-related bills that are now in reconciliation between chambers as the session approaches its May 2, 2026 deadline:

* '''HB 1782''': AI companion safeguards for minors — passed the House March 10, approved by Senate with amendments April 14 (31-0), House disagreed with amendments and returned the bill
* '''SB 3001''': AI operator disclosures and suicide prevention protocols — Senate passed the bill, House approved with amendments, Senate disagreed with House amendments
* '''HB 2137''': Deepfake protections and synthetic performer disclosure — advanced through both chambers, now in reconciliation<ref name="tcai-apr24" /><ref name="troutman-apr20" />

== Arizona: Three AI Bills Near Finish Line ==

As the Arizona legislature approached its April 25 adjournment, three AI-related bills remained in play:

* '''SB 1786''': AI content verification and provenance data requirements — passed the Senate March 3 and the House April 15, now in reconciliation
* '''HB 2133''': AI-related bill advancing through the legislature
* A third AI bill under consideration<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

== Utah: Legislature Adjourns After Passing Nine AI Bills ==

Utah's legislative session adjourned after Governor Spencer Cox signed nine AI-related bills into law, making Utah one of the most active states in AI regulation for 2026. The package covers deepfakes, consumer protection, education policy, and government oversight.<ref name="tcai-apr24" />

== Significance ==

The week of April 21–26, 2026, saw multiple states reach legislative milestones as sessions neared adjournment. The convergence of chatbot safety bills across Tennessee, Nebraska, and Hawaii signals growing bipartisan consensus on regulating conversational AI, while Alabama's focused approach to AI in health insurance reflects the sector-specific regulatory strategy adopted by several states. With Tennessee and Nebraska both enacting chatbot safety laws and Hawaii poised to follow, 2026 is shaping up as a landmark year for state AI legislation.

== See Also ==

* [[News Tennessee-SB-1700-CHAT-Act-2026|Tennessee CHAT Act (SB 1700)]]
* [[News Tennessee-AI-Personhood-Bill-SB-837-2026|Tennessee AI Personhood Bill (SB 837)]]
* [[News Tennessee-Healthcare-AI-Bill-SB-1580-2026|Tennessee Healthcare AI Bill (SB 1580)]]
* [[News Nebraska-LB-1185-Conversational-AI-Safety-Act-2026|Nebraska Conversational AI Safety Act (LB 1185)]]
* [[News Alabama-SB-63-Health-Insurance-AI-Signed-April-2026|Alabama SB 63 — AI Insurance Regulations]]
* [[News Hawaii-AI-Bills-Companion-Deepfake-2026|Hawaii AI Bills — Companion Safety, Deepfakes]]
* [[News Arizona-SB-1786-AI-Content-Verification-2026|Arizona SB 1786 — AI Content Verification]]
* [[News Utah-Governor-Signs-Nine-AI-Bills-April-2026|Utah Signs Nine AI Bills]]

== References ==

<references />

''See individual article: [[News State-AI-Legislation-Week-April-24-2026|State AI Legislation Week April 24]]''

----

== Categories ==

[[Category:Alabama]]
[[Category:Arizona]]
[[Category:Chatbot Regulation]]
[[Category:Child Safety]]
[[Category:Colorado]]
[[Category:Congress]]
[[Category:Consumer Protection]]
[[Category:Data Privacy]]
[[Category:Deepfakes]]
[[Category:Executive Branch]]
[[Category:Federal Legislation]]
[[Category:Federal Preemption]]
[[Category:Federal Regulation]]
[[Category:Hawaii]]
[[Category:Minnesota]]
[[Category:Nebraska]]
[[Category:State Legislation]]
[[Category:Tennessee]]
[[Category:Utah]]
[[Category:Daily News]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Migration export

2026-04-28T02:34:16Z

Migration export

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:34, 28 April 2026
(No difference)