https://ailawwiki.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Gracenote_Media_Services_v_OpenAIGracenote Media Services v OpenAI - Revision history2026-05-01T08:06:13ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.40.1https://ailawwiki.com/index.php?title=Gracenote_Media_Services_v_OpenAI&diff=17&oldid=prevAILawWikiAdmin: Migration export2026-04-28T02:34:16Z<p>Migration export</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>'''Gracenote Media Services, LLC v. OpenAI''' (Case No. 1:26-cv-01947, S.D.N.Y.) is a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Nielsen subsidiary Gracenote against OpenAI, alleging unauthorized copying and use of Gracenote's proprietary media metadata database to train and power AI products including ChatGPT.<ref name="complaint">[https://www.studocu.com/en-us/document/university-of-michigan/artificial-intelligence/gracenote-media-services-llc-v-openai-complaint-overview/158977873 Gracenote Media Services v. OpenAI Complaint Overview]</ref><ref name="axios">[https://www.axios.com/2026/03/10/nielsen-gracenote-lawsuit-openai-copyright-infringement Axios, "Nielsen's Gracenote sues OpenAI for copyright infringement", March 10, 2026]</ref><br />
<br />
== Parties ==<br />
<br />
; Plaintiff<br />
: '''Gracenote Media Services, LLC''', a Nielsen subsidiary that maintains a copyrighted entertainment metadata database (the Programs Database) covering music, video, and sports content, including relational architecture and descriptive metadata used by media distributors worldwide<ref name="complaint" /><ref name="axios" /><br />
<br />
; Defendants<br />
: OpenAI Foundation (f/k/a OpenAI, Inc.), OpenAI Group PBC, OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI, LLC, OpenAI OpCo, LLC, OpenAI Global, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, and OpenAI Holdings, LLC (collectively "OpenAI")<ref name="complaint" /><br />
<br />
; Plaintiff Counsel<br />
: Susman Godfrey LLP<ref name="complaint" /><br />
<br />
== Court ==<br />
<br />
; Court<br />
: United States District Court, Southern District of New York<br />
<br />
; Docket Number<br />
: 1:26-cv-01947<ref name="docket">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nysdce/1:2026cv01947/659334 Justia Docket: Gracenote v. OpenAI]</ref><br />
<br />
; Filing Date<br />
: March 10, 2026<ref name="axios" /><ref name="docket" /><br />
<br />
== Claims ==<br />
<br />
Gracenote alleges that OpenAI willfully copied its copyrighted metadata and relational framework without permission or license to train large language models for products like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Enterprise, and developer APIs. Specific allegations include:<ref name="complaint" /><ref name="vital">[https://www.vitallaw.com/news/copyright-news-entertainment-metadata-creator-sues-openai-alleges-unauthorized-use-of-copyrighted-works-for-ai-training/ipm01a3e681a1b0444a908007092ab24ddc0f VitalLaw, "Entertainment Metadata Creator Sues OpenAI"]</ref><br />
<br />
* Unauthorized reproduction of Gracenote's copyrighted Programs Database and relational architecture<br />
* OpenAI models reproduce exact copies of Gracenote data verbatim (e.g., exact "Game of Thrones" episode summaries and metadata)<br />
* AI outputs enable competitors to build substitutive metadata products, threatening Gracenote's core business<br />
* Willful infringement seeking actual damages, statutory damages, and injunctive relief<br />
* Jury trial demanded<br />
<br />
== Current Status ==<br />
<br />
The case is newly filed and pending. It has been affirmed as related to the Multi-District Litigation ''In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation''. No rulings, motions, or settlements have been reported as of April 2026. The complaint has been noted as the 90th U.S. copyright lawsuit against AI companies.<ref name="chatgptworld">[https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/category/gracenote-media-v-openai/ ChatGPTIsEatingTheWorld, "Gracenote Media v. OpenAI Case Tracker"]</ref><ref name="docket" /><br />
<br />
== Significance ==<br />
<br />
This case raises the novel issue of whether '''database metadata and relational architecture''' — not raw creative content but structured descriptive data — qualifies for copyright protection against AI training. A ruling in Gracenote's favor could significantly expand the scope of copyrighted material that AI companies must license, beyond traditional books, music, and images.<ref name="vital" /><ref name="axios" /><br />
<br />
== Related Cases ==<br />
<br />
* [[Bartz v Anthropic PBC]] — Authors' $1.5B settlement over pirated book training<br />
* [[Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc]] — Authors allege Meta trained LLaMA on pirated books<br />
* [[Carreyrou v Anthropic PBC]] — Opt-out authors sue multiple AI companies<br />
<br />
== References ==<br />
<br />
<references /><br />
<br />
[[Category:Copyright Litigation]]<br />
[[Category:Database Rights]]<br />
[[Category:Cases Against OpenAI]]</div>AILawWikiAdminhttps://ailawwiki.com/index.php?title=Gracenote_Media_Services_v_OpenAI&diff=191&oldid=prevAILawWikiAdmin: Migration export2026-04-28T02:34:16Z<p>Migration export</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 02:34, 28 April 2026</td>
</tr>
<!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff::1.12:old-17:rev-191 -->
</table>AILawWikiAdmin