ChatGPT - Revision history

AILawWikiAdmin: Add verified Hancox AI-filing judgment and September 17 coverage

2026-09-18T07:36:56Z

Add verified Hancox AI-filing judgment and September 17 coverage

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:36, 18 September 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	That report supplies a documented policy connection, but not proof that ChatGPT alone caused any particular law to be adopted. This profile covers the system and selected regulatory history; [[OpenAI]] covers the organization's own policy proposals and institutional role.<ref name="system-report" />		That report supplies a documented policy connection, but not proof that ChatGPT alone caused any particular law to be adopted. This profile covers the system and selected regulatory history; [[OpenAI]] covers the organization's own policy proposals and institutional role.<ref name="system-report" />

			== September 17, 2026: litigant responsibility ==
			The Employment Appeal Tribunal considered a 300-page ChatGPT-generated argument in [[Hancox v Sutherland]]. It emphasized litigants’ own responsibility for checking accuracy and complying with procedural requirements; AI assistance is not generally prohibited.<ref name="hancox-judgment">[https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6aabab820420ac660805f955/Mr_T_Hancox_v_Kenneth_Sutherland_and_Others__2026__EAT_139.pdf Hancox v Sutherland and Others [2026] EAT 139, September 17, 2026, cover, summary and paragraphs 1–3, 31–37, 39–40.]</ref> See [[AI Law Wiki News for September 17, 2026#UK tribunal requires litigants to check AI-generated submissions\|September 17 digest coverage]].

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==

AILawWikiAdmin: Connect comprehensive OpenAI incident overview and September 16 disclosure coverage

2026-09-16T23:43:18Z

Connect comprehensive OpenAI incident overview and September 16 disclosure coverage

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 16 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==
			* [[OpenAI 2026 Model Hacking Incidents]] — Incident chronology, overlapping reports and September 16, 2026 disclosures.
	* [[X Corp and X.AI LLC v Apple Inc et al\|X Corp. and X.AI LLC v. Apple Inc. et al. — AI antitrust litigation]]		* [[X Corp and X.AI LLC v Apple Inc et al\|X Corp. and X.AI LLC v. Apple Inc. et al. — AI antitrust litigation]]
	* [[Beus Gilbert PLLC v Brigham Young University]] — sanctions for unverified AI-assisted briefing, September 9, 2026.<ref name="sanctions">[https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2012cv00970/86552/385 U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Memorandum Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 385, September 9, 2026].</ref>		* [[Beus Gilbert PLLC v Brigham Young University]] — sanctions for unverified AI-assisted briefing, September 9, 2026.<ref name="sanctions">[https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2012cv00970/86552/385 U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Memorandum Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 385, September 9, 2026].</ref>

AILawWikiAdmin: Add September 14 reported Apple dismissal request and related AI antitrust coverage

2026-09-14T22:38:23Z

Add September 14 reported Apple dismissal request and related AI antitrust coverage

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 14 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==
			* [[X Corp and X.AI LLC v Apple Inc et al\|X Corp. and X.AI LLC v. Apple Inc. et al. — AI antitrust litigation]]
	* [[Beus Gilbert PLLC v Brigham Young University]] — sanctions for unverified AI-assisted briefing, September 9, 2026.<ref name="sanctions">[https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2012cv00970/86552/385 U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Memorandum Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 385, September 9, 2026].</ref>		* [[Beus Gilbert PLLC v Brigham Young University]] — sanctions for unverified AI-assisted briefing, September 9, 2026.<ref name="sanctions">[https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2012cv00970/86552/385 U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Memorandum Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 385, September 9, 2026].</ref>
	* [[State v Sandoval\|State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aarons — AI-assisted briefing sanctions]]		* [[State v Sandoval\|State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aarons — AI-assisted briefing sanctions]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Cover verified September 9 Beus Gilbert attorney sanctions and case-feed links

2026-09-13T21:34:47Z

Cover verified September 9 Beus Gilbert attorney sanctions and case-feed links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 13 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==
			* [[Beus Gilbert PLLC v Brigham Young University]] — sanctions for unverified AI-assisted briefing, September 9, 2026.<ref name="sanctions">[https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/utah/utdce/2:2012cv00970/86552/385 U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Memorandum Decision and Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 385, September 9, 2026].</ref>
	* [[State v Sandoval\|State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aarons — AI-assisted briefing sanctions]]		* [[State v Sandoval\|State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aarons — AI-assisted briefing sanctions]]
	* [[Chicken Soup for the Soul LLC v Meta Platforms Inc#September 10, 2026 discovery ruling\|September 10, 2026 nonparty-discovery ruling in the Meta copyright cases]]		* [[Chicken Soup for the Soul LLC v Meta Platforms Inc#September 10, 2026 discovery ruling\|September 10, 2026 nonparty-discovery ruling in the Meta copyright cases]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Connect verified September 9 case developments across directory, coverage and latest-case feed

2026-09-13T12:35:15Z

Connect verified September 9 case developments across directory, coverage and latest-case feed

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 13 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==
			* [[State v Sandoval\|State v. Sandoval / In re Stephen D. Aarons — AI-assisted briefing sanctions]]
	* [[Chicken Soup for the Soul LLC v Meta Platforms Inc#September 10, 2026 discovery ruling\|September 10, 2026 nonparty-discovery ruling in the Meta copyright cases]]		* [[Chicken Soup for the Soul LLC v Meta Platforms Inc#September 10, 2026 discovery ruling\|September 10, 2026 nonparty-discovery ruling in the Meta copyright cases]]
	* [[OpenAI]]		* [[OpenAI]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Add verified September 10 Meta discovery coverage and related case links

2026-09-12T23:51:17Z

Add verified September 10 Meta discovery coverage and related case links

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 12 September 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== Related articles ==		== Related articles ==
			* [[Chicken Soup for the Soul LLC v Meta Platforms Inc#September 10, 2026 discovery ruling\|September 10, 2026 nonparty-discovery ruling in the Meta copyright cases]]
	* [[OpenAI]]		* [[OpenAI]]
	* [[Policy]]		* [[Policy]]

AILawWikiAdmin: Remove redundant top-of-page navigation row at Craig’s request

2026-09-12T21:31:34Z

Remove redundant top-of-page navigation row at Craig’s request

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 12 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<div class="ailaw-systems-nav" style="font-size:0.92em;margin-bottom:1em;">[[Main Page\|Home]] · [[AI Systems]]</div>~~

	'''ChatGPT''' is a conversational AI service developed and operated by [[OpenAI]]. Its processing of personal data became the subject of a temporary restriction and investigation by Italy's data-protection authority in March 2023.<ref name="system-italy">[https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9870847 Garante, Artificial intelligence: stop to ChatGPT by the Italian SA, March 31, 2023]. Accessed September 12, 2026.</ref>		'''ChatGPT''' is a conversational AI service developed and operated by [[OpenAI]]. Its processing of personal data became the subject of a temporary restriction and investigation by Italy's data-protection authority in March 2023.<ref name="system-italy">[https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9870847 Garante, Artificial intelligence: stop to ChatGPT by the Italian SA, March 31, 2023]. Accessed September 12, 2026.</ref>

AILawWikiAdmin: Create AI Systems coverage and connect the new section

2026-09-12T21:19:29Z

Create AI Systems coverage and connect the new section

New page

<div class="ailaw-systems-nav" style="font-size:0.92em;margin-bottom:1em;">[[Main Page|Home]] · [[AI Systems]]</div>

'''ChatGPT''' is a conversational AI service developed and operated by [[OpenAI]]. Its processing of personal data became the subject of a temporary restriction and investigation by Italy's data-protection authority in March 2023.<ref name="system-italy">[https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9870847 Garante, Artificial intelligence: stop to ChatGPT by the Italian SA, March 31, 2023]. Accessed September 12, 2026.</ref>

== Data-protection intervention in Italy ==
On March 31, 2023, the Garante announced an immediate temporary limitation on OpenAI's processing of Italian users' data. The authority identified concerns about notice, the legal basis for training-data processing, inaccurate personal information and age verification. These were the authority's stated grounds for intervention, not a description of an AI system independently making policy.<ref name="system-italy" />

On April 28, 2023, the authority reported that OpenAI had restored access in Italy after introducing changes. These included information notices, ways to object to training uses of personal data, and age-related registration measures. The Garante said its investigation would continue and identified further requested work. Reopening access did not amount to a comprehensive finding of compliance.<ref name="system-reopen">[https://www.garanteprivacy.it/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9881490 Garante, OpenAI reinstates service in Italy, April 28, 2023]. Accessed September 12, 2026.</ref>

== General-purpose AI governance ==
The May 2024 ''International scientific report on the safety of advanced AI: interim report'' identified applications such as ChatGPT as a route through which general-purpose AI became familiar to the public. It described unusually strong public and policymaker interest and considered the opportunities and risks of systems capable of many tasks.<ref name="system-report">[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-scientific-report-on-the-safety-of-advanced-ai/international-scientific-report-on-the-safety-of-advanced-ai-interim-report International scientific report on the safety of advanced AI: interim report, May 2024, executive summary and introduction]. Accessed September 12, 2026.</ref>

That report supplies a documented policy connection, but not proof that ChatGPT alone caused any particular law to be adopted. This profile covers the system and selected regulatory history; [[OpenAI]] covers the organization's own policy proposals and institutional role.<ref name="system-report" />

== Related articles ==
* [[OpenAI]]
* [[Policy]]
* [[United States policy on catastrophic AI risk]]
* [[European Union policy on catastrophic AI risk]]

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:AI Systems]]