View source for SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen

'''''SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v. Narayen''''' is a shareholder derivative action filed on '''April 24, 2026''' in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Adobe Inc. CEO '''Shantanu Narayen''' and other Adobe officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties by adopting and implementing an unlawful business strategy of training Adobe's artificial intelligence services on copyrighted works without authorization.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld">[https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/2026/04/24/consolidated-copyright-complaint-v-adobe-in-lyon-lawsuit-filed-as-adobe-executives-hit-with-breach-of-fiduciary-lawsuit-by-shareholder-seiu-pension-plan-master-trust-based-on-adobes-ai-training-wit/ ChatGPT is Eating the World, April 24, 2026]</ref>

== Case Details ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Field
! Detail
|-
| '''Case Name''' || SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v. Narayen et al.
|-
| '''Court''' || U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
|-
| '''Filed''' || April 24, 2026
|-
| '''Plaintiff''' || SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust (on behalf of Adobe Inc.)
|-
| '''Defendants''' || Shantanu Narayen and other Adobe officers and directors
|-
| '''Claims''' || Breach of fiduciary duty (derivative action on behalf of Adobe Inc.)
|}

== Allegations ==

The complaint alleges that Adobe executives breached their fiduciary duties by adopting and implementing an "unlawful business strategy" whereby Adobe used copyrighted material to develop its AI services, exposing the company to substantial copyright infringement liability.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld" />

The derivative action is brought by the SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust, a shareholder of Adobe, on behalf of Adobe itself against its own officers and directors. Under Delaware corporate law (Adobe is incorporated in Delaware), shareholders may bring derivative suits when they allege that corporate management has harmed the corporation through breaches of fiduciary duty.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld" />

== Significance ==

This is the '''first shareholder derivative action''' against a public company based on its activity in training AI models using copyrighted works. It represents a novel legal theory that AI training on copyrighted material may constitute a breach of fiduciary duty by corporate officers, creating personal liability exposure for directors and executives beyond the company's direct copyright infringement risk.<ref name="chatgptiseatingtheworld" />

The case potentially opens a new category of AI-related litigation alongside direct copyright infringement suits, and may influence corporate governance practices around AI training data acquisition.

== See Also ==

* [[News Adobe-Shareholder-Derivative-Suit-2026|April 24, 2026 — SEIU Shareholder Derivative Suit v. Adobe Executives]]
* [[Kleiner v Adobe Inc]] — Direct copyright infringement suit against Adobe
* [[Cases]] — Active AI litigation tracker

== References ==

<references />

[[Category:Corporate Governance]]
[[Category:Copyright Litigation]]
[[Category:Publishing Industry]]