Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
News-July-22-2026
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
'''July 22, 2026''' — Anthropic announced an additional $20 million contribution to Public First Action, bringing the AI company's total support for the organization to $40 million as it advocates for stronger artificial-intelligence safeguards ahead of the U.S. midterm elections.<ref name="reuters-pfa">[https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/anthropic-donate-20-million-us-political-group-that-supports-ai-regulation-2026-07-22/ Reuters, "Anthropic to donate $20 million to US political group that supports AI regulation" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="thehill-pfa">[https://thehill.com/homenews/5982007-anthropic-pours-millions-midterms/ The Hill, "Anthropic pours another $20 million into AI safety group" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> Bloomsbury Publishing separately confirmed that 14,087 of its titles are covered by the court-approved $1.5 billion ''Bartz v. Anthropic'' copyright settlement.<ref name="bloomsbury">[https://www.bloomsbury-ir.co.uk/media/press_releases/2026/220726.asp Bloomsbury Publishing, "$1.5bn Anthropic Settlement Approved" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="tnw">[https://thenextweb.com/news/bloomsbury-anthropic-copyright-settlement The Next Web, "Bloomsbury among publishers in line for payout from Anthropic’s $1.5bn copyright settlement" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> White House technology official Michael Kratsios also alleged that China's Moonshot AI used model distillation from Anthropic's Fable to develop Kimi K3.<ref name="kratsios">[https://x.com/mkratsios47/status/2079933645888880708 Michael Kratsios, statement on X (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="trt-moonshot">[https://www.trtworld.com/article/257a475238b0 TRT World, "US alleges Chinese AI firm Moonshot stole from Anthropic's Fable for latest Kimi K3 model" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce published a legal statement concluding that English common law can address non-deliberate harms caused by AI systems without a new AI-specific liability regime.<ref name="ukjt">[https://lawtechuk.io/ukjt/liability-for-ai-harms-under-the-private-law-of-england-and-wales/ UK Jurisdiction Taskforce, "Liability for AI Harms under the private law of England and Wales" (2026)]</ref><ref name="aos">[https://www.aoshearman.com/en/insights/ao-shearman-on-tech/ai-liability-no-regulation-no-caselaw-no-problem-for-english-law-says-the-ukjt A&O Shearman, "AI liability: No regulation, no caselaw? No problem for English law says the UKJT" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> ChatGPT medical-advice litigation also expanded when Florida pastor Scott Winters sued OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleging ChatGPT-4o discouraged timely care for a pulmonary embolism.<ref name="cn-winters">[https://www.courthousenews.com/man-sues-openai-over-dangerous-medical-advice-from-chatgpt/ Courthouse News Service, "Man sues OpenAI over ‘dangerous’ medical advice from ChatGPT" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="eng-winters">[https://www.engadget.com/2221044/openai-sued-over-chatgpt-health-advice-that-almost-killed-a-pastor/ Engadget, "OpenAI sued over ChatGPT health advice that almost killed a pastor" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> News Corp also filed copyright counterclaims against Brave Software, alleging that Brave covertly scraped and resold versions of Wall Street Journal and New York Post articles to AI companies.<ref name="srn-brave">[https://srnnews.com/news-corp-countersues-brave-for-allegedly-scraping-articles-for-ai/ SRN News/Reuters, "News Corp countersues Brave for allegedly ‘scraping’ articles for AI" (July 22, 2026)]</ref><ref name="cb-brave">[https://cryptobriefing.com/news-corp-countersues-brave-ai-scraping/ Crypto Briefing, "News Corp countersues Brave for allegedly scraping articles to feed AI models" (July 22, 2026)]</ref> == Contents == # [[#Anthropic doubles support for pro-regulation AI advocacy group|Anthropic doubles support for pro-regulation AI advocacy group]] # [[#Bloomsbury identifies 14,087 titles covered by Anthropic settlement|Bloomsbury identifies 14,087 titles covered by Anthropic settlement]] # [[#White House official accuses Moonshot of distilling Anthropic model|White House official accuses Moonshot of distilling Anthropic model]] # [[#UK taskforce issues legal statement on liability for AI harms|UK taskforce issues legal statement on liability for AI harms]] # [[#Florida pastor sues OpenAI over ChatGPT medical advice|Florida pastor sues OpenAI over ChatGPT medical advice]] # [[#News Corp countersues Brave over AI article scraping|News Corp countersues Brave over AI article scraping]] ---- == Anthropic doubles support for pro-regulation AI advocacy group == Anthropic said it would contribute another $20 million to Public First Action after an earlier $20 million commitment, doubling the company's total support for the organization to $40 million.<ref name="reuters-pfa" /><ref name="thehill-pfa" /> Public First Action advocates for safeguards on artificial intelligence and is seeking to influence the November 2026 midterm elections as technology companies and political groups compete over the direction of U.S. AI policy.<ref name="reuters-pfa" /><ref name="thehill-pfa" /> ---- == Bloomsbury identifies 14,087 titles covered by Anthropic settlement == Bloomsbury Publishing said the U.S. District Court's final approval of the $1.5 billion ''Bartz v. Anthropic'' settlement makes the company one of the settlement's beneficiaries.<ref name="bloomsbury" /><ref name="tnw" /> The court's list includes 14,087 Bloomsbury titles, with approximately $3,000 allocated per covered work before fees and expenses and divided equally between the author and publisher.<ref name="bloomsbury" /><ref name="tnw" /> Bloomsbury said it expects to receive its share in several payments beginning in the second half of its financial year.<ref name="bloomsbury" /> ''See case page: [[Bartz v Anthropic PBC]].'' ---- == White House official accuses Moonshot of distilling Anthropic model == Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said the U.S. government had information that Moonshot AI distilled Anthropic's Fable model to develop Kimi K3.<ref name="kratsios" /><ref name="trt-moonshot" /> He characterized large-scale covert distillation intended to obtain proprietary U.S. technology as unacceptable; the statement was an allegation by the official, not a publicly adjudicated finding.<ref name="kratsios" /><ref name="trt-moonshot" /> TRT World reported that model distillation trains a smaller model using outputs from a larger model, and that the State Department had previously directed diplomats to highlight alleged Chinese attempts to obtain intellectual property from U.S. AI laboratories.<ref name="trt-moonshot" /> ---- == UK taskforce issues legal statement on liability for AI harms == The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce, a Ministry of Justice-backed initiative, published a legal statement on liability under the private law of England and Wales for non-deliberate harms caused by AI systems.<ref name="ukjt" /><ref name="aos" /> The taskforce concluded that English common law is sufficiently flexible to address AI-related harms by applying existing doctrines incrementally, with contracts likely to allocate risk across the AI supply chain and negligence providing the principal framework where contracts do not govern.<ref name="ukjt" /><ref name="aos" /> The statement also identifies causation and evidence as central issues in AI disputes and says liability for negligent or fraudulent chatbot misstatements may arise when a legal person makes or adopts the statements.<ref name="ukjt" /><ref name="aos" /> ---- == Florida pastor sues OpenAI over ChatGPT medical advice == Scott Winters filed suit in San Francisco Superior Court on July 22 against OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleging ChatGPT-4o downplayed recurrent dizziness and discouraged him from seeking medical care before he was hospitalized with a pulmonary embolism.<ref name="cn-winters" /><ref name="eng-winters" /> The complaint asserts strict-liability, negligence, unfair-competition, invasion-of-privacy, and negligent-undertaking claims.<ref name="cn-winters" /> Winters seeks damages and safeguards including stronger medical warnings and a pause in ChatGPT Health until independent reviewers determine it is safe.<ref name="cn-winters" /><ref name="eng-winters" /> ''See case page: [[Winters v OpenAI LLC]].'' ---- == News Corp countersues Brave over AI article scraping == News Corp filed counterclaims on July 21 in Brave Software’s federal declaratory-judgment action in the Northern District of California, alleging that Brave covertly scraped copyrighted articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Post and distributed or sold versions of them to AI companies.<ref name="srn-brave" /><ref name="cb-brave" /> Brave had filed the original action in March 2025 after receiving a cease-and-desist letter, seeking a declaration that its practices were lawful.<ref name="srn-brave" /><ref name="cb-brave" /> News Corp seeks an injunction, unspecified monetary relief, and statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement.<ref name="srn-brave" /><ref name="cb-brave" /> ''See case page: [[Brave Software Inc v News Corp]].'' == References == <references /> [[Category:Federal Regulation]] [[Category:Congress]] [[Category:Copyright Litigation]] [[Category:Publishing Industry]] [[Category:Settlements]] [[Category:Cases Against Anthropic]] [[Category:Executive Branch]] [[Category:China]] [[Category:International]] [[Category:United Kingdom]] [[Category:Product Liability]] [[Category:Healthcare AI]] [[Category:Consumer Protection]] [[Category:Cases Against OpenAI]] [[Category:California]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
News-July-22-2026
Add topic