Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;" |- ! Case Name | Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. |- ! Docket | 3:23-cv-03417-VC |- ! Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |- ! Judge | Hon. Vince Chhabria |- ! Filed | July 7, 2023 |- ! Plaintiffs | Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, and other authors |- ! Defendant | Meta Platforms, Inc. |- ! Claims | Copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, DMCA violations |- ! Status | Active β Fourth Amended Complaint allowed April 2026 |} '''Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc.''' is a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a group of authors against Meta Platforms, alleging that Meta used pirated copies of their books from shadow libraries to train its LLaMA AI models. == Allegations == The plaintiffs allege that Meta copied their copyrighted books without authorization and used them as training data for its LLaMA large language models. The case was filed alongside similar lawsuits against OpenAI and other AI companies in the Northern District of California. In April 2026, Judge Vince Chhabria reluctantly granted the plaintiffs' motion to file a Fourth Amended Complaint, adding a contributory copyright infringement claim related to Meta's alleged torrenting of copyrighted books from shadow libraries. The court expressed concern about the expanding scope of the litigation but allowed the amendment to proceed. == Procedural History == * '''July 7, 2023''' β Initial complaint filed * '''November 2023''' β First Amended Complaint filed * '''February 2024''' β Second Amended Complaint filed * '''2025''' β Third Amended Complaint * '''April 2026''' β Fourth Amended Complaint allowed, adding contributory infringement claim == Significance == Kadrey v. Meta is one of the lead cases in the wave of AI copyright litigation. It addresses novel questions about whether training AI models on copyrighted works constitutes fair use, and whether the use of torrented/pirated training data creates additional liability beyond direct infringement. == See Also == * [[News Kadrey v Meta Fourth Amended Complaint April 2026|April 6, 2026 β Fourth Amended Complaint Allowed]] * [[Carreyrou v Anthropic PBC]] * [[Businessing LLC v Runway AI Inc]] * [[Beaulier v NVIDIA et al]] == References == <references /> [[Category:Copyright Litigation]] [[Category:Cases Against Meta]] [[Category:Northern District of California]] [[Category:Publishing Industry]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc
Add topic