Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
BMG Rights Management v Anthropic PBC
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
'''BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Anthropic PBC''' is a copyright infringement lawsuit filed on March 17, 2026, in which music publisher BMG alleges Anthropic used 493 copyrighted musical compositions to train its Claude AI models without authorization.<ref name="justia">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/5:2026cv02334/466061 Justia Docket: BMG Rights Management v. Anthropic PBC, No. 5:26-cv-02334 (N.D. Cal.)]</ref> == Background == On March 17, 2026, BMG Rights Management (US) LLC filed suit against Anthropic PBC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose division), case number 5:26-cv-02334.<ref name="musicbiz">[https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/bmg-sues-anthropic-alleging-ai-giants-380b-valuation-was-built-on-stolen-copyrighted-works/ Music Business Worldwide: BMG Sues Anthropic, Alleging AI Giant's "$380B Valuation Was Built On Stolen Copyrighted Works"]</ref> The complaint alleges that Anthropic copied lyrics from 493 BMG-owned compositions β including works by Bruno Mars, The Rolling Stones, Louis Armstrong, and others β via web scraping and torrenting pirated books from shadow libraries like Library Genesis.<ref name="changeflow">[https://changeflow.com/govping/courts-legal/bmg-rights-management-sues-anthropic-pbc-over-copyright-2026-03-18 Changeflow: BMG Rights Management Sues Anthropic PBC Over Copyright]</ref> == Claims == BMG's 47-page complaint asserts five causes of action:<ref name="musicbiz" /> # '''Direct copyright infringement''' through training AI models and generating outputs reproducing BMG lyrics # '''Direct copyright infringement''' via torrenting pirated materials containing BMG works # '''Contributory infringement''', for enabling user or third-party infringement # '''Vicarious infringement''', for profiting from and controlling infringing activities # '''Removal or alteration of Copyright Management Information (CMI)''' under DMCA Β§1202, alleging Anthropic used tools to strip copyright notices from works The complaint alleges Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei authorized torrenting to bypass licensing requirements and that Anthropic ignored a December 2025 cease-and-desist letter from BMG.<ref name="changeflow" /> == Relief Sought == BMG demands a jury trial and seeks:<ref name="dailyrecord">[https://thedailyrecord.com/2026/03/20/bmg-sues-anthropic-for-using-bruno-mars-rolling-stones-lyrics-in-ai-training/ The Daily Record: BMG Sues Anthropic for Using Bruno Mars, Rolling Stones Lyrics in AI Training]</ref> * Statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringed work (potentially billions for 493 works) * Actual damages and profits disgorgement * Injunctive relief to halt use of BMG works * Costs and attorneys' fees BMG has requested assignment to the judge handling related Universal Music Publishing Group, Concord, and ABKCO cases against Anthropic.<ref name="musicbiz" /> == Significance == The BMG lawsuit is the latest in a series of copyright actions against Anthropic by music industry plaintiffs and follows the [[News Anthropic-1.5B-Settlement-2026|proposed $1.5 billion settlement]] with authors and publishers in the parallel [[Bartz v Anthropic PBC]] class action. Unlike the authors' settlement, BMG proceeds independently as a music publisher rather than joining the existing class action framework. The case is also notable for its CMI removal claims under DMCA Β§1202, which extend beyond the standard copyright infringement claims in other AI training data cases and could establish new precedent if successful. == Related Cases == * [[Bartz v Anthropic PBC]] β Authors' class action settled for $1.5 billion (fairness hearing May 14, 2026) * [[Kadrey v Meta Platforms Inc]] β Authors allege Meta trained LLaMA on pirated books * [[UMG Recordings Inc v Suno Inc]] β Major labels sue AI music generator * [[UMG Recordings Inc v Uncharted Labs Inc]] β Record labels sue Udio AI music platform == References == <references /> [[Category:Copyright Litigation]] [[Category:Cases Against Anthropic]] [[Category:Music Industry]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
BMG Rights Management v Anthropic PBC
Add topic