Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
News-June-15-2026
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Meta must face adult-film copyright suit over alleged AI-training downloads == TorrentFreak reported on June 15, 2026, that a California federal judge denied Meta's motion to dismiss a copyright suit by adult-content producers Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media over alleged BitTorrent downloads of adult films.<ref name="tfmeta" /> The report said the complaint accused Meta of using adult films to assist AI model training, but the court held that the plaintiffs did not need to prove AI-training use at the motion-to-dismiss stage because the alleged torrenting itself stated an infringement theory.<ref name="tfmeta" /> TorrentFreak reported that Meta had argued any downloads were for personal use rather than AI training, and that the court did not accept dismissal on that basis at this stage.<ref name="tfmeta" /> The court order made available by TorrentFreak denied Meta's motion to dismiss and allowed the copyright claims to proceed.<ref name="order">[https://torrentfreak.com/images/meta-strike-mtd.pdf U.S. District Court order denying Meta's motion to dismiss, as posted by TorrentFreak (June 2026).]</ref> The development is significant for AI law because it permits a copyright-infringement case tied to alleged AI-training data acquisition to proceed even without requiring the plaintiffs to prove the downstream training use in their pleadings.<ref name="tfmeta" /><ref name="order" /> ----
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
News-June-15-2026
(section)
Add topic