Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chmura v Snap Inc
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Allegations == Plaintiff Nicole Chmura alleges that Snap Inc. circumvented YouTube's technological access controls to scrape, bulk-download, and extract YouTube-hosted audiovisual works at the file level for training Snapchat's AI systems.<ref name="copyright-feb"/> Specific claims include: * Snap used circumvention tools and services to defeat YouTube's streaming-only restrictions at scale * The company instructed employees to evade detection and scrape repeatedly for video clips * Snapchat's AI systems were trained on unlawfully accessed copyrighted content without creator permission or licenses * The circumvention was conducted deliberately and systematically to obtain commercial AI training data<ref name="copyright-feb"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Chmura v Snap Inc
(section)
Add topic
