Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
AI Law Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
ANI Media Pvt Ltd v OpenAI Inc
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Interim ruling == On July 24, 2026, Justice Amit Bansal refused ANI's request for an interim injunction after finding that ANI had not established a prima facie case for relief.<ref name="medianama" /> The court found at the interim stage that storing ANI's works for model training fell within Section 52(1)(a) of India's Copyright Act and that the cited ChatGPT outputs were not substantially similar to ANI's reports.<ref name="medianama" /> The court also found that ANI had not shown memorization or regurgitation of its works in ChatGPT responses.<ref name="medianama" /> The ruling did not end the main suit, which continues.<ref name="medianama" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to AI Law Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
AI Law Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
ANI Media Pvt Ltd v OpenAI Inc
(section)
Add topic