AI Law Wiki - Recent changes [en]

Category:Washington

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:30 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Washington

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of Washington.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Tennessee

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:29 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Tennessee

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of Tennessee.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Supreme Court

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:28 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Supreme Court

New page

AI-related cases and developments before the Supreme Court of the United States.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:State Legislation

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:27 GMT

Create category description page for Category:State Legislation

New page

AI-related bills and laws enacted at the U.S. state level.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Southern District of New York

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:26 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Southern District of New York

New page

AI-related cases filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:New York

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMT

Create category description page for Category:New York

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of New York.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Northern District of California

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Northern District of California

New page

AI-related cases filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Missouri

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:24 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Missouri

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of Missouri.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Florida

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:22 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Florida

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of Florida.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Federal Regulation

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:21 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Federal Regulation

New page

United States federal agency actions concerning AI (FTC, Commerce, DOJ, White House).

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Federal Legislation

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:20 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Federal Legislation

New page

AI-related bills and laws in the United States Congress.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:European Union

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:19 GMT

Create category description page for Category:European Union

New page

AI law and regulation developments within the European Union.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:EU AI Act

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:16 GMT

Create category description page for Category:EU AI Act

New page

The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act — implementation, enforcement, and related developments.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Deepfakes

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:14 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Deepfakes

New page

Regulation and litigation concerning synthetic media and deepfake technology.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:DMCA

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:11 GMT

Create category description page for Category:DMCA

New page

Legal cases and regulation involving the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the context of AI.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Copyright Litigation

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:08 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Copyright Litigation

New page

Lawsuits alleging copyright infringement by AI companies.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Colorado

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:06 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Colorado

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of Colorado.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Child Safety

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:05 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Child Safety

New page

AI-related regulations and litigation concerning the protection of minors.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Chatbot Regulation

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:03 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Chatbot Regulation

New page

Laws and regulations governing conversational AI services and chatbot platforms.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against Suno

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:02 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Cases Against Suno

New page

Legal cases in which Suno, Inc. is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against OpenAI

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:55:01 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Cases Against OpenAI

New page

Legal cases in which OpenAI, Inc. is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against Meta

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:54:58 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Cases Against Meta

New page

Legal cases in which Meta Platforms, Inc. is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against Google

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:54:56 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Cases Against Google

New page

Legal cases in which Google LLC (or Alphabet Inc.) is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against Anthropic

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:54:54 GMT

Create category description page for Category:Cases Against Anthropic

New page

Legal cases in which Anthropic PBC is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:California

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:54:52 GMT

Create category description page for Category:California

New page

AI-related legislation and regulation in the state of California.

[[Category:Categories]]

Cases

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:45:05 GMT

Update Musk v Altman trial status to reflect Day 2 testimony

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 29 April 2026
Line 30:		Line 30:

	=== Corporate Governance Cases ===		=== Corporate Governance Cases ===
	* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Elon Musk sues OpenAI cofounders for breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment (fraud claims dropped April 25, 2026); bench trial with advisory jury ~~begins~~ April 27, 2026		* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Elon Musk sues OpenAI cofounders for breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment (fraud claims dropped April 25, 2026); bench trial with advisory jury began April 27, 2026; [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|Musk testified April 28]]
	* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit against AI company executives for AI training on copyrighted works (filed April 24, 2026)		* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit against AI company executives for AI training on copyrighted works (filed April 24, 2026)

Musk v Altman et al

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:43:55 GMT

Update with Day 2 trial developments: Musk testimony, YGR admonishments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 29 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Musk v. Altman et al.''' (Case No. 4:24-cv-04722-YGR) is a landmark lawsuit in which '''Elon Musk''' alleges that '''OpenAI''' cofounders '''Sam Altman''' and '''Greg Brockman''' breached a charitable trust and were unjustly enriched by Musk's donations, after promising that OpenAI would remain a nonprofit. Originally filed as a 26-claim complaint including fraud and constructive fraud, the case was narrowed to two claims on April 24–25, 2026, when Musk voluntarily dismissed his fraud claims ahead of trial. ~~Jury selection begins~~ April 27, 2026, before Judge '''Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers''' in the ~~United States~~ District Court for the Northern District of California (Oakland).<ref name="justia">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/4:2024cv04722/433688 Justia: Musk v. Altman et al Docket]</ref><ref name="businessinsider">[https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-vs-openai-sam-altman-legal-battle-stakes-microsoft-2026-4 Business Insider, "Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman: The stakes for OpenAI and Microsoft," April 2026]</ref><ref name="musk-drops-fraud">[https://fortune.com/2026/04/25/elon-musk-fraud-claims-openai-sam-altman-trial/ Fortune, "Elon Musk drops fraud claims against OpenAI ahead of trial," April 25, 2026]</ref><ref name="cybernews-drops">[https://cybernews.com/ai-news/musk-drops-fraud-claims-in-openai-lawsuit-two-claims-head-to-trial/ Cybernews, "Musk drops fraud claims in OpenAI lawsuit, two claims head to trial," April 25, 2026]</ref><ref name="justia">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/4:2024cv04722/433688 Justia: Musk v. Altman et al Docket]</ref><ref name="businessinsider">[https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-vs-openai-sam-altman-legal-battle-stakes-microsoft-2026-4 Business Insider, "Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman: The stakes for OpenAI and Microsoft," April 2026]</ref>		'''Musk v. Altman et al.''' (Case No. 4:24-cv-04722-YGR) is a landmark lawsuit in which '''Elon Musk''' alleges that '''OpenAI''' cofounders '''Sam Altman''' and '''Greg Brockman''' breached a charitable trust and were unjustly enriched by Musk's donations, after promising that OpenAI would remain a nonprofit. Originally filed as a 26-claim complaint including fraud and constructive fraud, the case was narrowed to two claims on April 24–25, 2026, when Musk voluntarily dismissed his fraud claims ahead of trial. A '''bench trial with advisory jury''' began April 27, 2026 before Judge '''Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers''' in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Oakland). On '''April 28, 2026''', Musk took the stand, testifying that Altman and Brockman illegally "looted" OpenAI's charitable assets after he invested $38 million under the condition it remain a nonprofit. Judge Gonzalez Rogers admonished both sides to refrain from using social media to inflame the dispute and warned OpenAI not to take inconsistent positions in her courtroom.<ref name="law360-trial">[https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/musk-testifies-looting-openai Law360, "Musk Testifies Altman 'Looting' OpenAI Charity For Own Gain," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="bloomberg-ygr">[https://www.bloomberg.com/ Bloomberg, "Musk v. Altman: judge asks executives to control social media," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="verge-day2">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "Elon Musk appeared more petty than prepared," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="justia">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/4:2024cv04722/433688 Justia: Musk v. Altman et al Docket]</ref><ref name="businessinsider">[https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-vs-openai-sam-altman-legal-battle-stakes-microsoft-2026-4 Business Insider, "Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman: The stakes for OpenAI and Microsoft," April 2026]</ref><ref name="musk-drops-fraud">[https://fortune.com/2026/04/25/elon-musk-fraud-claims-openai-sam-altman-trial/ Fortune, "Elon Musk drops fraud claims against OpenAI ahead of trial," April 25, 2026]</ref><ref name="cybernews-drops">[https://cybernews.com/ai-news/musk-drops-fraud-claims-in-openai-lawsuit-two-claims-head-to-trial/ Cybernews, "Musk drops fraud claims in OpenAI lawsuit, two claims head to trial," April 25, 2026]</ref><ref name="justia">[https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/candce/4:2024cv04722/433688 Justia: Musk v. Altman et al Docket]</ref><ref name="businessinsider">[https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-vs-openai-sam-altman-legal-battle-stakes-microsoft-2026-4 Business Insider, "Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman: The stakes for OpenAI and Microsoft," April 2026]</ref>

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 118:		Line 118:

	== See Also ==		== See Also ==
			* [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|Musk v. Altman Trial Begins (April 27, 2026)]]
	* [[News Musk-v~~-OpenAI-~~Trial-April-2026\|~~April 26, 2026 —~~ Musk v. ~~OpenAI~~ Trial Begins ~~With Jury Selection~~ April 27]]		* [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|Musk v. Altman Trial Day 2: Musk Testifies (April 28, 2026)]]
	* [[~~Nippon Life~~ v ~~OpenAI Foundation~~]] ~~— OpenAI sued for unlicensed practice of law~~		* [[News Musk v OpenAI Trial April 2026\|Musk v. OpenAI Trial Overview (April 2026)]]
	* [[~~Doe~~ v X.~~AI Corp]] — xAI~~ (~~Musk's company~~) ~~sued for CSAM deepfakes~~		* [[Musk v Altman et al]] (this page)
	* [[Cases]] ~~— Active AI litigation tracker~~		]

	~~== References ==~~

	~~<references />~~

	[[~~Category:Cases Against OpenAI~~]]
	~~[[Category:Corporate Governance]~~]

Main Page

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:43:29 GMT

Add April 29, 2026 daily digest; update Musk v Altman trial status

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 29 April 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Consolidated daily articles with all news from each day:		Consolidated daily articles with all news from each day:

			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]] — Musk testifies Altman 'looting' OpenAI; OpenAI-AWS partnership; China freezes robotaxi licenses; Meta violates EU child safety law; Pentagon AI chief confirms Google work
	* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's $2B Manus AI acquisition; OpenAI caps Microsoft revenue share; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant challenge; Musk v. Altman jury seated; DOJ joins xAI Colorado challenge		* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's $2B Manus AI acquisition; OpenAI caps Microsoft revenue share; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant challenge; Musk v. Altman jury seated; DOJ joins xAI Colorado challenge
	* [[News April 26 2026\|April 26, 2026 — SEIU shareholder derivative suit, Getty v Stability AI ruling, Britannica/Gracenote stays, Adobe consolidated complaint]]		* [[News April 26 2026\|April 26, 2026 — SEIU shareholder derivative suit, Getty v Stability AI ruling, Britannica/Gracenote stays, Adobe consolidated complaint]]
Line 47:		Line 48:
	* [[Doe v X.AI Corp\|Doe v. xAI]] — Minors allege Grok generated CSAM deepfakes		* [[Doe v X.AI Corp\|Doe v. xAI]] — Minors allege Grok generated CSAM deepfakes
	* [[XAI Corp v Weiser\|xAI v. Weiser]] — xAI challenges Colorado AI Act on constitutional grounds; DOJ intervenes on xAI side		* [[XAI Corp v Weiser\|xAI v. Weiser]] — xAI challenges Colorado AI Act on constitutional grounds; DOJ intervenes on xAI side
	* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Charitable trust dispute over OpenAI governance; [[News Musk v ~~OpenAI~~ Trial April 2026\|bench trial ~~begins~~ April 27 ~~with fraud claims dropped~~		* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Charitable trust dispute over OpenAI governance; [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|bench trial began April 27]]; [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|Musk testified April 28, accusing Altman of 'looting' charity]]

	* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen\|SEIU v. Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit over AI training on copyrighted works (Adobe)		* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen\|SEIU v. Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit over AI training on copyrighted works (Adobe)

News

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:39:51 GMT

Add April 29, 2026 digest entries

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 29 April 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The following daily digest articles consolidate multiple news stories from each day:		The following daily digest articles consolidate multiple news stories from each day:

			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]]
	* [[News April 24 2026\|April 24, 2026]]		* [[News April 24 2026\|April 24, 2026]]
	* [[News April 22 2026\|April 22, 2026]]		* [[News April 22 2026\|April 22, 2026]]
Line 27:		Line 28:

	== April 2026 ==		== April 2026 ==
			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]] — Musk testifies Altman 'looting' OpenAI; OpenAI-AWS partnership launched; China freezes robotaxi licenses; Meta violates EU child safety law; Pentagon AI chief confirms Google work
			* [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Trial Day 2: Musk Testifies, Judge Admonishes Both Sides]]
			* [[News-OpenAI-AWS-Partnership-2026\|April 28, 2026 — OpenAI-AWS Partnership Announced After Microsoft Exclusivity Ends]]
			* [[News-China-Freezes-Robotaxi-Licenses-2026\|April 29, 2026 — China Freezes New Robotaxi Licenses After Baidu Chaos]]
			* [[News-Meta-EU-Child-Safety-Violation-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Meta Found to Violate EU Child Safety Law]]
			* [[News-Pentagon-AI-Chief-Google-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Pentagon AI Chief Confirms Google Work, Cautions Overreliance]]
	* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's Manus acquisition; OpenAI restructures Microsoft partnership; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant case		* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's Manus acquisition; OpenAI restructures Microsoft partnership; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant case
	* [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|April 27, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Bench Trial Begins With Advisory Jury Selection]]		* [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|April 27, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Bench Trial Begins With Advisory Jury Selection]]

News-April-29-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:35:39 GMT

Create daily digest for April 29, 2026

New page

'''April 29, 2026''' — Daily digest of AI law and policy developments.

This digest consolidates 5 stories from April 28–29, 2026.

== Contents ==
1. [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026|Musk v. Altman Trial: Day 2 — Musk Testifies]]
2. [[News-OpenAI-AWS-Partnership-2026|OpenAI-AWS Partnership Announced After Microsoft Exclusivity Ends]]
3. [[News-China-Freezes-Robotaxi-Licenses-2026|China Freezes New Robotaxi Licenses After Baidu Chaos]]
4. [[News-Meta-EU-Child-Safety-Violation-2026|Meta Found to Violate EU Child Safety Law]]
5. [[News-Pentagon-AI-Chief-Google-2026|Pentagon AI Chief Confirms Google Work, Cautions Overreliance]]

----
== Musk v. Altman Trial: Day 2 — Musk Testifies ==
Elon Musk testified on April 28, 2026, accusing Sam Altman and Greg Brockman of "looting" OpenAI's charitable assets after he invested $38 million under the condition the company remain a nonprofit. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers admonished both sides to stop using social media to exacerbate the conflict and scolded OpenAI for taking inconsistent positions on the origin of its name.<ref name="law360">[https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/musk-testifies-looting-openai Law360, "Musk Testifies Altman 'Looting' OpenAI Charity For Own Gain," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="bloomberg">[https://www.bloomberg.com/ Bloomberg, "Musk v. Altman: judge asks executives to control social media," April 28, 2026]</ref>

''See full article: [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026|April 28, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Trial Day 2: Musk Testifies, Judge Admonishes Both Sides]]''

----
== OpenAI-AWS Partnership Announced After Microsoft Exclusivity Ends ==
OpenAI announced an expanded partnership with AWS on April 28, 2026, bringing its latest AI models, Codex, and developer tools to Amazon's cloud platform. The deal comes one day after restructuring Microsoft exclusivity terms and appears designed to address antitrust concerns about Big Tech–AI startup relationships.<ref name="verge">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "OpenAI-AWS partnership," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "OpenAI brings its models to Amazon's cloud," April 28, 2026]</ref>

''See full article: [[News-OpenAI-AWS-Partnership-2026|April 28, 2026 — OpenAI-AWS Partnership]]''

----
== China Freezes New Robotaxi Licenses After Baidu Chaos ==
China's regulators froze all new robotaxi operating licenses after dozens of Baidu Apollo Go vehicles simultaneously froze in Wuhan traffic last month, causing widespread disruption. The freeze is the most significant regulatory intervention in China's autonomous vehicle sector and may delay expansion plans for Baidu, Pony.ai, and competitors.<ref name="bloomberg-china">[https://www.bloomberg.com/ Bloomberg, "China freezes new robotaxi licenses after Baidu chaos," April 29, 2026]</ref>

''See full article: [[News-China-Freezes-Robotaxi-Licenses-2026|April 29, 2026 — China Freezes Robotaxi Licenses]]''

----
== Meta Found to Violate EU Child Safety Law ==
EU regulators found that Meta violated the Digital Services Act by failing to adequately prevent children from accessing its platforms. The finding could lead to fines of up to 6% of global revenue and signals aggressive enforcement of the DSA's child safety provisions.<ref name="cnbc-meta">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "Meta found to have violated EU law by failing to keep children off its platform," April 28, 2026]</ref>

''See full article: [[News-Meta-EU-Child-Safety-Violation-2026|April 28, 2026 — Meta EU Child Safety Violation]]''

----
== Pentagon AI Chief Confirms Google Work, Cautions Overreliance ==
The Pentagon's chief AI officer confirmed the DoD is actively working with Google on AI initiatives while cautioning that overreliance on any single provider is "never a good thing." The comment supports arguments for multi-vendor architectures in government AI procurement.<ref name="cnbc-pentagon">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "Pentagon AI chief confirms work with Google," April 28, 2026]</ref>

''See full article: [[News-Pentagon-AI-Chief-Google-2026|April 28, 2026 — Pentagon AI Chief Confirms Google Work]]''

----
== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Federal Regulation]]
[[Category:Corporate Governance]]
[[Category:International]]
[[Category:China]]
[[Category:European Union]]
[[Category:Child Safety]]

News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:11 GMT

Create article: Musk v Altman trial Day 2 testimony

New page

= Musk v. Altman Trial: Day 2 — Musk Testifies, Judge Admonishes Both Sides =

'''Elon Musk''' took the stand on '''April 28, 2026''' for the second day of the ''Musk v. Altman'' bench trial in Oakland federal court, testifying that OpenAI co-founders '''Sam Altman''' and '''Greg Brockman''' illegally converted the company into a for-profit enterprise after he invested $38 million under the express condition that it remain a nonprofit.<ref name="law360">[https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/musk-testifies-looting-openai Law360, "Musk Testifies Altman 'Looting' OpenAI Charity For Own Gain," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="verge-day2">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "Elon Musk appeared more petty than prepared," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="bloomberg">[https://www.bloomberg.com/ Bloomberg and Madlin Mekelburg, "Musk v. Altman: judge asks executives to control social media," April 28, 2026]</ref>

== Musk's Testimony ==
Musk accused Altman and Brockman of "looting" OpenAI's charitable assets for personal and commercial gain, warning that if their actions were allowed to stand, it would create a precedent for "looting in every charity in America." He characterized the for-profit conversion as a betrayal of the nonprofit mission he claims induced his original donations.<ref name="law360" /> The testimony was described by courtroom observers as unfocused at times, with Musk appearing "more petty than prepared" in his opening statements.<ref name="verge-day2" />

== Judge's Admonishment ==
Presiding Judge '''Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers''' (YGR) issued a sharp rebuke to both sides, asking Musk and Altman to "control your propensity to use social media to make things worse outside this courtroom."<ref name="bloomberg" /> She also scolded OpenAI's legal team for taking "inconsistent positions on the origin of its name," noting that arguments made in this case appeared to conflict with positions taken in other litigation. "Do not take inconsistent positions in front of me," she warned.<ref name="verge-ygr">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "YGR scolds OpenAI for taking inconsistent positions on the origin of its name," April 28, 2026]</ref>

== Trial Status ==
The trial continues with Musk's remaining two claims: '''breach of charitable trust''' and '''unjust enrichment'''. The case is being heard as a '''bench trial with an advisory jury''' before Judge Gonzalez Rogers. Day 2 marked the first full day of testimony following jury selection on April 27.<ref name="law360" />

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Corporate Governance]]
[[Category:Northern District of California]]

News-Meta-EU-Child-Safety-Violation-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:10 GMT

Create article: Meta EU child safety violation

New page

European Union regulators found that '''Meta Platforms violated EU law''' by failing to adequately prevent children from accessing and using its platforms, according to reports on '''April 28, 2026'''. The finding represents a significant enforcement action under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), which imposes strict obligations on very large online platforms to protect minors.<ref name="cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "Meta found to have violated EU law by failing to keep children off its platform," April 28, 2026]</ref>

The violation finding could lead to substantial fines under the DSA, which permits penalties of up to 6% of a company's global annual turnover. Meta had previously faced scrutiny over its age verification practices, and this determination confirms that its existing measures were deemed legally insufficient by EU authorities.<ref name="cnbc" />

== Broader Context ==
The decision is part of a broader EU regulatory crackdown on platform responsibilities toward minors. Alongside the DSA, the EU AI Act's provisions on high-risk AI systems that interact with children also impose obligations on platforms deploying AI-powered recommendation and content moderation systems that affect minors.<ref name="cnbc" />

== Significance ==
The ruling adds to Meta's growing regulatory headwinds in Europe, following fines under the GDPR and ongoing investigations under the Digital Markets Act. It also signals that the DSA's child safety provisions will be aggressively enforced, which may accelerate AI companies' compliance investments in age assurance technologies.

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:International]]
[[Category:European Union]]
[[Category:Child Safety]]
[[Category:EU AI Act]]

News-Pentagon-AI-Chief-Google-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:10 GMT

Create article: Pentagon AI chief confirms Google work

New page

The '''Pentagon's chief AI officer''' confirmed on '''April 28, 2026''' that the Department of Defense is actively working with Google on AI initiatives, while simultaneously cautioning that overreliance on any single technology provider is "never a good thing."<ref name="cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "Pentagon AI chief confirms work with Google, says overreliance is 'never a good thing'," April 28, 2026]</ref>

The acknowledgment of the Google relationship comes amid intensifying debate over the role of major technology companies in national security AI applications. The Pentagon has historically relied on multiple cloud and AI providers, including Microsoft, Amazon, and Palantir, to avoid vendor lock-in and ensure resilience.<ref name="cnbc" />

== Background ==
Google's relationship with the Pentagon had been controversial within the company; in 2018, Google declined to renew its Project Maven contract with the DoD after employee protests. The new confirmation suggests the company has since deepened its defense work, reflecting broader industry trends as AI becomes central to military planning and operations.<ref name="cnbc" />

== Significance ==
The Pentagon AI chief's emphasis on avoiding single-provider dependence echoes broader concerns in AI governance about concentration risk. It supports arguments for interoperability standards and multi-vendor architectures in government AI procurement, which may influence future defense authorization language and acquisition rules.

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Federal Regulation]]
[[Category:Executive Branch]]
[[Category:Sector-Specific Regulation]]

News-OpenAI-AWS-Partnership-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:09 GMT

Create article: OpenAI-AWS partnership announced

New page

OpenAI announced an expanded partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS) on '''April 28, 2026''', bringing its latest AI models, Codex, and other developer tools to AWS's cloud platform. The deal was announced one day after OpenAI restructured its landmark exclusivity arrangement with Microsoft, freeing the company to partner more broadly with competing cloud providers.<ref name="verge">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "OpenAI-AWS partnership announced after Microsoft exclusivity ends," April 28, 2026]</ref><ref name="cnbc">[https://www.cnbc.com/technology/ CNBC, "OpenAI brings its models to Amazon's cloud after ending exclusivity with Microsoft," April 28, 2026]</ref>

Under the new agreement, OpenAI's models will be available through Amazon Bedrock, AWS's managed service for foundation models. AWS CEO Matt Garman and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman described the partnership as focused on enterprise-grade AI deployments, with particular emphasis on Amazon Bedrock Managed Agents.<ref name="amazon">[https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/aws-openai-partnership Amazon News, "AWS and OpenAI announce expanded partnership," April 28, 2026]</ref>

== Significance ==
The dual restructuring — first with Microsoft, then with AWS — appears designed to address antitrust concerns from the Federal Trade Commission and European Commission about the tightness of Big Tech–AI startup relationships. By broadening its cloud partnerships, OpenAI reduces the appearance of being a captive asset of any single cloud provider.<ref name="verge" />

The move positions AWS to compete more directly with Microsoft Azure for AI workloads and signals a maturation of OpenAI's infrastructure strategy beyond its founding relationship with Microsoft.

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Federal Regulation]]
[[Category:Consumer Protection]]

News-China-Freezes-Robotaxi-Licenses-2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:09 GMT

Create article: China robotaxi license freeze

New page

China's national regulators '''froze all new robotaxi operating licenses''' across the country on approximately '''April 29, 2026''', following a high-profile incident in which dozens of Baidu's Apollo Go robotaxis simultaneously froze in traffic in Wuhan last month, causing widespread disruption and public alarm.<ref name="bloomberg">[https://www.bloomberg.com/ Bloomberg, "China freezes new robotaxi licenses after Baidu chaos," April 29, 2026]</ref><ref name="verge">[https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence The Verge, "China freezes new robotaxi licenses after Baidu chaos," April 29, 2026]</ref>

The freeze represents Beijing's most significant regulatory intervention in the autonomous vehicle sector to date. China has been one of the world's most aggressive markets for robotaxi deployment, with Baidu's Apollo Go service operating in over 10 cities. The move signals that even China's permissive regulatory environment has limits when public safety concerns arise.<ref name="bloomberg" />

== Background ==
Baidu's Apollo Go had grown rapidly, with Wuhan becoming its largest operational hub. The fleet freeze incident, which occurred in approximately March 2026, involved dozens of vehicles becoming immobilized simultaneously due to a software malfunction, paralyzing sections of Wuhan's road network for hours.<ref name="bloomberg" />

== Significance ==
The freeze is likely to delay expansion plans for Baidu and competitors including Pony.ai, AutoX, and WeRide. It also creates an opening for U.S. and European regulators to point to China's caution as precedent for their own autonomous vehicle safety frameworks.<ref name="verge" />

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:International]]
[[Category:China]]
[[Category:Sector-Specific Regulation]]

News

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:41 GMT

Remove non-standard Category:Main Navigation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 29 April 2026
Line 126:		Line 126:
	* [[News Chmura v Snap AI DMCA 2026\|February 18, 2026 — YouTuber Sues Snap Inc for DMCA Violations Over AI Video Training]]		* [[News Chmura v Snap AI DMCA 2026\|February 18, 2026 — YouTuber Sues Snap Inc for DMCA Violations Over AI Video Training]]
	* [[News Kleiner v Adobe AI Copyright 2026\|February 9, 2026 — Author Sues Adobe for Training SlimLM on Pirated Books3 Dataset]]		* [[News Kleiner v Adobe AI Copyright 2026\|February 9, 2026 — Author Sues Adobe for Training SlimLM on Pirated Books3 Dataset]]


	== International ==		== International ==
Line 133:		Line 132:
	* [[News UK AI Regulation Developments 2026\|UK Continues Sector-Specific AI Regulation With DUAA, FCA Mills Review, and Regulatory Sandbox Expansion]]		* [[News UK AI Regulation Developments 2026\|UK Continues Sector-Specific AI Regulation With DUAA, FCA Mills Review, and Regulatory Sandbox Expansion]]
	* [[News Asia Pacific AI Law Developments 2026\|Asia-Pacific: South Korea Basic AI Act, China Cybersecurity Law Amendments, Japan APPI Draft, Vietnam Digital Technology Law]]		* [[News Asia Pacific AI Law Developments 2026\|Asia-Pacific: South Korea Basic AI Act, China Cybersecurity Law Amendments, Japan APPI Draft, Vietnam Digital Technology Law]]


	~~[[Category:Main Navigation]]~~

Main Page

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:39 GMT

Remove non-standard Category:Main Page

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 29 April 2026
Line 84:		Line 84:

	Content is updated regularly. All entries include inline citations and primary sources where available.		Content is updated regularly. All entries include inline citations and primary sources where available.

	~~[[Category:Main Page]]~~

News Utah Governor Signs Nine AI Bills April 2026

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:37 GMT

Remove duplicate Category:State Legislation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 29 April 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:
	<references />		<references />

	~~[[Category:State Legislation]]~~
	[[Category:State Legislation]]		[[Category:State Legislation]]
	[[Category:Transparency]]		[[Category:Transparency]]

Category:District of Colorado

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:36 GMT

Create category page for Category:District of Colorado

New page

AI-related cases filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Daily News

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:34 GMT

Create category page for Category:Daily News

New page

Daily digest articles consolidating multiple AI law news stories by date.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against MiniMax

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:32 GMT

Create category page for Category:Cases Against MiniMax

New page

Legal cases in which MiniMax (a Chinese AI company) is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

Category:Cases Against Adobe

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:25:30 GMT

Create category page for Category:Cases Against Adobe

New page

Legal cases in which Adobe Inc. is named as a defendant in AI-related litigation.

[[Category:Categories]]

File:UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc. - Complaint.pdf

Maintenance script — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:30:27 GMT

Maintenance script uploaded File:UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Suno, Inc. - Complaint.pdf == Summary == Importing file

New page

== Summary ==
Importing file

File:UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Uncharted Labs, Inc. - Complaint.pdf

Maintenance script — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:30:27 GMT

Maintenance script uploaded File:UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Uncharted Labs, Inc. - Complaint.pdf == Summary == Importing file

New page

== Summary ==
Importing file

File:Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Complaint.pdf

Maintenance script — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:30:27 GMT

Maintenance script uploaded File:Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Complaint.pdf == Summary == Importing file

New page

== Summary ==
Importing file

File:Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022).pdf

Maintenance script — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:30:27 GMT

Maintenance script uploaded File:Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022).pdf == Summary == Importing file

New page

== Summary ==
Importing file

Main Page

AILawWikiAdmin — Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:22:36 GMT

Restore original Main Page from SiteGround export

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<strong>MediaWiki has been installed.</strong>
+Welcome to AI Law Wiki, a resource tracking legal developments in artificial intelligence.
-Consult the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents User's Guide] for information on using the wiki software.
+== Browse by Section ==
-== Getting started ==
+{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;"
-* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Configuration_settings Configuration settings list]
+|-
-* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:FAQ MediaWiki FAQ]
+! Section !! Description !! Quick Links
-* [https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/mediawiki-announce.lists.wikimedia.org/ MediaWiki release mailing list]
+|-
-* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Localisation#Translation_resources Localise MediaWiki for your language]
+| '''[[News]]''' || Chronological updates on AI law developments || [[News|All News]] • [[News#Daily Consolidated Articles|Daily Digests]]
-* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Combating_spam Learn how to combat spam on your wiki]
+|-

Main Page

MediaWiki default — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 03:37:54 GMT

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Welcome to AI Law Wiki, a resource tracking legal developments in artificial intelligence.
+<strong>MediaWiki has been installed.</strong>
-== Browse by Section ==
+Consult the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents User's Guide] for information on using the wiki software.
-{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;"
+== Getting started ==
-|-
+* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Configuration_settings Configuration settings list]
-! Section !! Description !! Quick Links
+* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:FAQ MediaWiki FAQ]
-|-
+* [https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/mediawiki-announce.lists.wikimedia.org/ MediaWiki release mailing list]
-| '''[[News]]''' || Chronological updates on AI law developments || [[News|All News]] • [[News#Daily Consolidated Articles|Daily Digests]]
+* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Localisation#Translation_resources Localise MediaWiki for your language]
-|-
+* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Combating_spam Learn how to combat spam on your wiki]

Anthropic PBC v U.S. Department of War

AILawWikiAdmin — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:34:16 GMT

Migration export

New page

'''Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War''' (Case No. 3:26-cv-01996-RFL) is a federal lawsuit in which AI company '''Anthropic PBC''' challenges the Trump administration's designation of the company as a supply-chain risk to national security, alleging that the designation was retaliatory punishment for Anthropic's refusal to remove AI safety restrictions from its Claude model. On '''March 26, 2026''', U.S. District Judge '''Rita F. Lin''' granted Anthropic a '''preliminary injunction''' blocking the government-wide ban on Anthropic's technology, finding the company likely to succeed on First Amendment retaliation and Fifth Amendment due process claims.<ref name="clearinghouse">[https://clearinghouse.net/case/47876/ Clearinghouse, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War]</ref><ref name="bloomberg-order">[https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rYKRX7EU4j5U/v0 Bloomberg Law, Preliminary Injunction Order, March 26, 2026]</ref><ref name="cand-docket">[https://cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cases/326-cv-01996/ U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Case 3:26-cv-01996]</ref>

== Case Background ==

On March 9, 2026, Anthropic filed suit against the U.S. Department of War, Secretary Pete Hegseth, and 17 federal agencies in the '''U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California''', challenging a presidential directive and the Department's designation of Anthropic as a supply-chain risk under '''41 U.S.C. § 4713''' and '''10 U.S.C. § 3252'''. The designation would have barred Anthropic and its affiliates from supplying products or services to the Department of War and, under a government-wide directive, effectively prevented any federal agency from using Anthropic's technology.<ref name="clearinghouse" /><ref name="cand-docket" />

Anthropic alleged the designation was issued after the company publicly refused to remove two usage restrictions from its Claude AI system: prohibitions on '''lethal autonomous warfare''' and '''mass surveillance of Americans'''. The company argued the government's actions constituted impermissible retaliation against Anthropic for exercising its First Amendment rights to speak out on matters of public concern and to set terms for the use of its own products.<ref name="bloomberg-order" /><ref name="catiobrief">[https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2026-03/(27-1)%20Brief.pdf Cato Institute, Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic, March 2026]</ref>

== Claims ==

Anthropic's complaint asserted five counts:<ref name="clearinghouse" />

# '''Administrative Procedure Act violations''' — The supply-chain risk designation was arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with law
# '''First Amendment retaliation''' — The government punished Anthropic for protected speech (refusing to remove AI safety restrictions)
# '''Ultra vires executive action''' — The President exceeded statutory authority in directing a government-wide ban
# '''Fifth Amendment due process''' — Anthropic was deprived of liberty and property interests without due process
# '''APA sanction violations''' — The designation constituted an unlawful sanction under APA

== Preliminary Injunction (March 26, 2026) ==

On '''March 26, 2026''', Judge Rita F. Lin granted Anthropic's motion for a preliminary injunction, issuing the following key findings:<ref name="bloomberg-order" />

* Anthropic demonstrated a '''high likelihood of success''' on its First Amendment retaliation claim, having made a ''prima facie'' case that the government's actions were motivated by Anthropic's protected speech
* Anthropic was '''likely to succeed''' on its Fifth Amendment due process claim
* The government '''failed to prove''' that Anthropic's conduct qualifies as a supply-chain risk under the relevant statutes
* The court found evidence that the designation appeared '''pretextual''' — designed to punish Anthropic for criticizing the DOD's contracting position rather than addressing genuine national security concerns

Judge Lin granted the government a '''seven-day administrative stay''' to seek an emergency, expedited stay from the Court of Appeals. The GSA restored Anthropic's status by early April 2026, and a government status report was filed on April 6, 2026 (Dkt. No. 146).<ref name="gsa">[https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/newsroom/news-releases/gsa-issues-statement-on-anthropic-preliminary-injunction-04032026 GSA Statement on Anthropic Preliminary Injunction, April 3, 2026]</ref>

A separate D.C. Circuit case challenging the 41 U.S.C. § 4713 designation remains undecided.<ref name="clearinghouse" />

== Amicus Briefs ==

The case attracted significant amicus support. Multiple organizations filed briefs supporting Anthropic, including:<ref name="catiobrief" /><ref name="sfrl-brief">[https://societyfortheruleoflaw.org/amicus-brief-anthropic-dow/ Society for the Rule of Law, Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic]</ref><ref name="yale-brief">[https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Admin/Documents/News/anthropic-rolc-amicus-brief-filed.pdf Yale Law School, Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic]</ref>

* '''Cato Institute''' — Argued the government's retaliation violates core First Amendment principles
* '''Society for the Rule of Law''' — Former national security officials warned the designation undermines national security by politicizing procurement
* '''Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)''' — Emphasized the chilling effect on AI safety research
* '''Industry trade associations''' (ITI and others) — Warned of broad harmful impact on the technology sector
* '''Yale Law School Rule of Law Clinic''' — Argued the executive action exceeds statutory authority

== Significance ==

The case is one of the first major legal confrontations between an AI company and the U.S. government over AI safety restrictions and government retaliation. Its implications include:

* '''AI safety vs. government mandates''': Tests whether the government can punish AI companies for maintaining safety guardrails that conflict with government preferences
* '''First Amendment protections for AI companies''': Establishes that AI companies have constitutional protections when setting terms for the use of their products
* '''Supply-chain risk designation limits''': Clarifies that government procurement restrictions must be based on genuine security concerns, not retaliation
* '''Chilling effect on AI safety''': A ruling against Anthropic could discourage AI companies from implementing safety restrictions that displease government agencies

== Current Status ==

The case is '''ongoing'''. The preliminary injunction remains in effect, and the litigation on the merits continues. The D.C. Circuit case on the 41 U.S.C. § 4713 designation is also pending.<ref name="clearinghouse" /> As of April 26, 2026, no trial date has been set.

== See Also ==

* [[Bartz v Anthropic PBC]] — Copyright litigation involving Anthropic
* [[Carreyrou v Anthropic PBC]] — Opt-out copyright lawsuit
* [[BMG Rights Management v Anthropic PBC]] — Music lyrics copyright case

== References ==

<references />

[[Category:Federal Regulation]]
[[Category:Executive Branch]]

BMG Rights Management v Anthropic PBC

AILawWikiAdmin — Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:34:16 GMT

Migration export

← Older revision

Revision as of 02:34, 28 April 2026

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 29 April 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Consolidated daily articles with all news from each day:		Consolidated daily articles with all news from each day:

			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]] — Musk testifies Altman 'looting' OpenAI; OpenAI-AWS partnership; China freezes robotaxi licenses; Meta violates EU child safety law; Pentagon AI chief confirms Google work
	* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's $2B Manus AI acquisition; OpenAI caps Microsoft revenue share; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant challenge; Musk v. Altman jury seated; DOJ joins xAI Colorado challenge		* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's $2B Manus AI acquisition; OpenAI caps Microsoft revenue share; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant challenge; Musk v. Altman jury seated; DOJ joins xAI Colorado challenge
	* [[News April 26 2026\|April 26, 2026 — SEIU shareholder derivative suit, Getty v Stability AI ruling, Britannica/Gracenote stays, Adobe consolidated complaint]]		* [[News April 26 2026\|April 26, 2026 — SEIU shareholder derivative suit, Getty v Stability AI ruling, Britannica/Gracenote stays, Adobe consolidated complaint]]
Line 47:		Line 48:
	* [[Doe v X.AI Corp\|Doe v. xAI]] — Minors allege Grok generated CSAM deepfakes		* [[Doe v X.AI Corp\|Doe v. xAI]] — Minors allege Grok generated CSAM deepfakes
	* [[XAI Corp v Weiser\|xAI v. Weiser]] — xAI challenges Colorado AI Act on constitutional grounds; DOJ intervenes on xAI side		* [[XAI Corp v Weiser\|xAI v. Weiser]] — xAI challenges Colorado AI Act on constitutional grounds; DOJ intervenes on xAI side
	* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Charitable trust dispute over OpenAI governance; [[News Musk v ~~OpenAI~~ Trial April 2026\|bench trial ~~begins~~ April 27 ~~with fraud claims dropped~~		* [[Musk v Altman et al]] — Charitable trust dispute over OpenAI governance; [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|bench trial began April 27]]; [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|Musk testified April 28, accusing Altman of 'looting' charity]]

	* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen\|SEIU v. Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit over AI training on copyrighted works (Adobe)		* [[SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v Narayen\|SEIU v. Narayen]] — First shareholder derivative suit over AI training on copyrighted works (Adobe)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 29 April 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	The following daily digest articles consolidate multiple news stories from each day:		The following daily digest articles consolidate multiple news stories from each day:

			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]]
	* [[News April 24 2026\|April 24, 2026]]		* [[News April 24 2026\|April 24, 2026]]
	* [[News April 22 2026\|April 22, 2026]]		* [[News April 22 2026\|April 22, 2026]]
Line 27:		Line 28:

	== April 2026 ==		== April 2026 ==
			* [[News-April-29-2026\|April 29, 2026]] — Musk testifies Altman 'looting' OpenAI; OpenAI-AWS partnership launched; China freezes robotaxi licenses; Meta violates EU child safety law; Pentagon AI chief confirms Google work
			* [[News-Musk-v-Altman-Trial-Day-2-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Trial Day 2: Musk Testifies, Judge Admonishes Both Sides]]
			* [[News-OpenAI-AWS-Partnership-2026\|April 28, 2026 — OpenAI-AWS Partnership Announced After Microsoft Exclusivity Ends]]
			* [[News-China-Freezes-Robotaxi-Licenses-2026\|April 29, 2026 — China Freezes New Robotaxi Licenses After Baidu Chaos]]
			* [[News-Meta-EU-Child-Safety-Violation-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Meta Found to Violate EU Child Safety Law]]
			* [[News-Pentagon-AI-Chief-Google-2026\|April 28, 2026 — Pentagon AI Chief Confirms Google Work, Cautions Overreliance]]
	* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's Manus acquisition; OpenAI restructures Microsoft partnership; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant case		* [[News-April-27-2026\|April 27, 2026]] — China blocks Meta's Manus acquisition; OpenAI restructures Microsoft partnership; Supreme Court hears geofence warrant case
	* [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|April 27, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Bench Trial Begins With Advisory Jury Selection]]		* [[News Musk v Altman Trial Begins April 27 2026\|April 27, 2026 — Musk v. Altman Bench Trial Begins With Advisory Jury Selection]]