News-July-14-2026

July 14, 2026 — Major publishers and author Scott Turow sued Google in a new Southern District of New York copyright case over alleged use of books and articles to train Gemini AI models, and current and former Meta employees sued over alleged AI-assisted layoff decisions.

Contents

1. Publishers and Scott Turow sue Google over Gemini AI training
2. White House launches Gold Eagle AI cyberthreat clearinghouse
3. Meta employees sue over AI-assisted layoffs

---

Publishers and Scott Turow sue Google over Gemini AI training

Hachette Book Group, Elsevier, Cengage Learning, S.C.R.I.B.E., and author Scott Turow filed Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Google LLC against Google in the Southern District of New York on July 10, 2026. The docket lists the case as copyright infringement, identifies Google LLC as the defendant, and gives docket number 1:26-cv-05870. TheWrap reported on July 14, 2026, that the publishers allege Google used millions of copyrighted books and articles without permission to build Gemini AI models.

See case page: Hachette Book Group Inc v Google LLC

---

White House launches Gold Eagle AI cyberthreat clearinghouse

The White House launched the Gold Eagle initiative on July 14, 2026, describing it as a cybersecurity vulnerability coordination effort for sharing information about AI-related cyber threats between the federal government and private-sector partners. CyberScoop reported that the clearinghouse had already begun receiving intelligence on vulnerabilities and compromises tied to artificial intelligence systems. The White House release said the initiative is intended to coordinate reporting, analysis, and response around cyber vulnerabilities involving AI infrastructure and AI-enabled attacks.

---

Meta employees sue over AI-assisted layoffs

Twenty-six current and former Meta employees filed a federal lawsuit in the Northern District of California alleging that Meta used internal AI systems to score, rank, and select employees for a May 2026 workforce reduction. Ars Technica reported that the complaint alleges the AI-assisted process targeted workers with disabilities and workers who took protected medical or family leave. Courthouse News Service reported that the plaintiffs assert claims under state protected-leave laws, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

See case page: Doe Employees v Meta Platforms Inc